Good Morning,
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 18:36:29 -0400
Mark Fink mpf...@gmail.com wrote:
[...removed totally annoying article...]
As I'm not a MONO Fanboy myself...and sometimes boycott novell does
write good articles...but please...
Mono gives us a good way into the MS front...this could also be a
as benfrank said yesterday on boycottnovell:
The solution seems obvious and easy: don’t make Mono or Mono apps
part of the default install. Leave them in the repos for the users who
want them. Easy as falling over. Not wanting to even discuss such a
simple solution makes it credible that Ubuntu
you sound like a typical M$ appologist. do you sleep well at night?
hope they are paying you well.
Clearly Mark doesn't understand the meaning of the phrase personal attack...
Physician, heal thyself.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings
This guy is trolling you hard. REALLY hard.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Remcoremc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Mackenzie Morganmaco...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 08 June 2009 7:49:32 am Mark Fink wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Stephan
On Monday 08 June 2009 9:39:31 am Mark Fink wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Mackenzie Morganmaco...@gmail.com wrote:
Instead of whinging, why don't you write BETTER replacements for those
applications in C, if it bothers you so much? Whinging is simply not
constructive.
people
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Remcoremc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Luke Llukehasnon...@gmail.com wrote:
This guy is trolling you hard. REALLY hard.
Who is trolling me? I think Mark Fink can use some communication
skills, but he has a certain point somewhere deep
On Monday 08 June 2009 10:00:27 am Mark Fink wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Remcoremc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Luke Llukehasnon...@gmail.com wrote:
This guy is trolling you hard. REALLY hard.
Who is trolling me? I think Mark Fink can use some
Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
Jo is a nice fellow, met him at UDS. Didn't seem very much to be
infiltrating...more like sitting around being cheerful and chatting with
whatever folks sat down.
Oh sure. That's what he _wants_ you to think
--
derek
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Mackenzie Morganmaco...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps I misunderstand why the term application framework is any better
than a pile of libraries and languages that work together, but I think it'd be
extremely difficult for Microsoft to try to argue that .NET is older
On Monday 08 June 2009 10:55:32 am Remco wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Mackenzie Morganmaco...@gmail.com wrote:
And in using Flash, we're Adobe technology users (even if, like I do, you
use
swfdec instead of Adobe's plugin). Sometimes pragmatism is needed to gain
enough users for
This is clearly a not invented here syndrome. please read wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_invented_here
I'm a software engineer, I personally tried both java and .net (I
don't like python very much because it's easy to get things out of
control)
I don't care where a technology is
Hi Scott:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:07, Scott James Remnant sc...@canonical.comwrote:
[0] sharp-eyed readers will know this has just been end-of-lifed; we
have yet to decide whether to change the platform as a result - a
possibility is to use the Dell Mini 10v which should give
hi,
I would like to see a recent maxima/wxmaxima version to be added to a (still
open) repo
the latest maxima version is 5.17: http://maxima.sourceforge.net/
the latest in ANY of the repos is 5.13
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=maxima
the Debian package of 5.17 installs and runs
On Monday 08 June 2009 11:35:15 am Remco wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Mackenzie Morganmaco...@gmail.com wrote:
IIRC, video is:
1) only in HTML5, not XHTML
Which is irrelevant. Nobody uses XHTML. The kind of fake XHTML that
some web designers use can use video without problem.
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:17 AM, Vincenzo Cianciacian...@di.unipi.it wrote:
That was awesome. Why haven't I seen the functionality used before?
Install directions with repositories involved look completely hostile
right now, but this resolves the issue perfectly.
The functionality of saving
Remco wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Mackenzie Morganmaco...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps I misunderstand why the term application framework is any
better than a pile of libraries and languages that work together, but I
think it'd be extremely difficult for Microsoft to try to argue that
Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
This is clearly a not invented here syndrome. please read wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_invented_here
I'm a software engineer, I personally tried both java and .net (I
don't like python very much because it's easy to get things out of
control)
I don't
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Derek Broughtonde...@pointerstop.ca wrote:
Remco wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Mackenzie Morganmaco...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps I misunderstand why the term application framework is any
better than a pile of libraries and languages that work together,
Someone from Access chimed in on this one, glad he's getting paid to dick
around like this.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Remco remc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Derek Broughtonde...@pointerstop.ca
wrote:
Remco wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Mackenzie
well _sir_, I just cant help _but_ notice _that_ you are all_acting
douchebags--_and_ I thought _I_ might _make_ that obser_vation_.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:22 PM, David Schlesinger
david.schlesin...@access-company.com wrote:
Someone from Access chimed in on this one, glad he's getting paid
Remco wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Derek Broughtonde...@pointerstop.ca
wrote:
Remco wrote:
We're still being a Microsoft technology user, which is what Mark
Shuttleworth didn't want, and is the reason why Wine is not included
in Ubuntu.
It's not? When did that happen?
$
Remco wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:52 PM, David
Schlesingerdavid.schlesin...@access-company.com wrote:
As Derek pointed out, Wine is indeed in the universal repository. You
were completely mistaken about it, rendering your argument meaningless.
The appropriate response at that point is
Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
sorry stephan for getting this twice, didn't hit reply-to-mailinglist
Oh well...in the 80ties/90ties when Java was invented and was used by
more people then Turbo Pascal in no time, I said the same...It was
closed source, and had too much of Sun in it..
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:17 AM, David
Schlesingerdavid.schlesin...@access-company.com wrote:
Basically, it just needs the same love as Mono.
One thing I think I can state with certainty about free and open source
software development is that demanding that a bunch of other folks drop what
Remco wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Derek Broughtonde...@pointerstop.ca
wrote:
Remco wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:52 PM, David
Schlesingerdavid.schlesin...@access-company.com wrote:
As Derek pointed out, Wine is indeed in the universal repository. You
were completely mistaken
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Derek Broughtonde...@pointerstop.ca wrote:
Remco wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Derek Broughtonde...@pointerstop.ca
wrote:
Remco wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:52 PM, David
Schlesingerdavid.schlesin...@access-company.com wrote:
As Derek pointed
I sorry, just wanted to be a part of the lols
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Remco remc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Derek Broughtonde...@pointerstop.ca
wrote:
Remco wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Derek Broughtonde...@pointerstop.ca
wrote:
Remco wrote:
As a reader of this list I have to confess that the tone of the emails
being sent appear to have degenerated into name calling and I have to
confess that I'm not particularly interested to spend my voluntary spare
time reading messages between people abusing one another.
Perhaps I'm naive in
2009/6/9 Derek Broughton de...@pointerstop.ca
Sorry, but no. You are pretending to have a rational discussion, while
dismissing perfectly valid arguments.
The codecs are
not-in-Ubuntu the same way as Wine, because they are not installed,
No, they are not. The codecs are NOT in Ubuntu
Perhaps I'm naive in thinking that a technical argument can be had in a
civilised tone.
Ah, but you see...these are NOT technical arguments.
These are about 'standards'. Can there really be a technical argument
between using say the metric system versus the foot/yard or the
30 matches
Mail list logo
