Hello,
David MENTRE writes:
>> Do following operations in 6 rounds. Start round /n/ once round /n+1/
>> is finished. In the following:
>> * synchronize: synchronize source package from Debian unstable to
>> Ubuntu karmic;
>> * recompile: recompile the source package in Karmic;
>> * manual_che
Hello,
I'm trying to sign the Code of Conduct[1] (in order to use PPA). I have
downloaded UbuntuCodeofConduct-1.0.1.txt and signed it.
$ gpg --clearsign UbuntuCodeofConduct-1.0.1.txt
The signature seems correct:
$ LANG=C gpg --verify UbuntuCodeofConduct-1.0.1.txt.asc
gpg: Signature made Mon
Hi Matthew,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> I know that this is a very pedantic point, but when distributing kernel
> builds (or, indeed, any other GPLed code) it's helpful to include the
> source (or a pointer to the source) alongside it
Right, an obvious oversight on
Hey Monty, etc.,
$ wget
http://launchpad.net/drizzle/trunk/aloha/+download/drizzle-2009.07.1098.tar.gz
&& \
tar xfvz drizzle-2009.07.1098.tar.gz && \
cd drizzle-2009.07.1098 && \
sudo apt-get build-dep libdrizzle0 && \
sudo apt-get install gperf libprotobuf-dev protobuf-compiler uuid-dev
Il 27/07/2009 17:42, Vincenzo Ciancia ha scritto:
> the forms submitted to
> ubuntu.com
The forms are not submitted to ubuntu.com so that is a non-issue.
Changed the bug accordingly.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
h
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 01:56:46PM -0400, Daniel Chen wrote:
> [0]
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2009-May/008239.html
> [1] http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~dtchen/test-kernels/powerdown/
I know that this is a very pedantic point, but when distributing kernel
builds (or, ind
[Please notice the cross-post and use the reply button accordingly]
As there were many bugs related to the subject in launchpad, I did not
consider the possibility that a separate bug on the "phylosophical"
issue could be filed. I was convinced to do that on IRC. Communication
is good.
Here I
> I understand that you're annoyed because you feel an issue that's
> important to you has been ignored for a long time, but venting your
> feelings to the list is never productive. You are more likely to get
> useful responses if you focus on constructive areas of debate, and
> ignore irrelevant
Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> The fact that there is nobody willing to reply (I posted a similar
> message one year ago, so this is certainly not a matter of time) can
> mean only two things:
>
> 1) on this list, nobody knows the answer. I think this is likely. Then,
> the custom search should be r
> Are you not part of this community?
>
No, I am not a developer. I am part of the broader community of ubuntu
users (I do lots of bug reporting). If I write to ubuntu-devel-discuss
maybe there is some developer on it, and maybe they can even communicate
between each other. But let us stop que
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> That's the most "universal" place that I know where users and developers
> may meet. Certainly ubuntu-devel is not the right place (maybe it's even
> moderated?). How can you be sure ubuntu-mozilla developers and maybe
> M.S. are not readin
Il 27/07/2009 12:26, Sebastien Bacher ha scritto:
> (could you stop private copying me and reply on the list?)
>
> On lun., 2009-07-27 at 12:16 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
>> Sebastian: did you notice another message that has been there for one
>> year?
>
> How does that change the fact that the
(could you stop private copying me and reply on the list?)
On lun., 2009-07-27 at 12:16 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> Sebastian: did you notice another message that has been there for one
> year?
How does that change the fact that the people you want to reach might
not be reading the list yo
Il 27/07/2009 10:46, Sebastien Bacher ha scritto:
> On sam., 2009-07-25 at 16:45 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
>> 1) on this list, nobody knows the answer. I think this is likely.
>> Then,
>> the custom search should be removed from firefox. Nobody knows why it
>> is
>> there.
>
> You seem to jump
Il 27/07/2009 10:52, Alan Pope ha scritto:
>
> ..or read his blog post about it:)
>
> http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/162-What-is-this-Multisearch-thing-in-my-Firefox-about.html
>
> (which I can see Vincenzo already has, and has indeed commented on it
> [assuming that's Vincenzo]).
When som
2009/7/27 Sebastien Bacher :
> Wouldn't it make sense to rather try contacting the maintainer or the
> ubuntu mozilla team about the issue or to open a bug on launchpad so you
> can get a reply from the people doing the changes?
>
..or read his blog post about it :)
http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/a
On sam., 2009-07-25 at 16:45 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> 1) on this list, nobody knows the answer. I think this is likely.
> Then,
> the custom search should be removed from firefox. Nobody knows why it
> is
> there.
You seem to jump to a weird conclusion, because busy maintainers don't
re
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Kai-Cheung
Leung wrote:
> Debian is still supporting MIPS64, which the Chinese Loongson chips
> are compartible with. And Ubuntu codes are lifted from Debian.
>
> I would like to have an unofficial repository for MIPS64/Loongson, at
> least in main, and if this wor
18 matches
Mail list logo
