On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Denis Washington wrote:
Greetings Dennis,
Given that this Ubuntu cycle is all about precision with little
Who do you think? (Is that something to file a bug about?)
I think it's an excellent idea to streamline the Grub menu. Could you
perhaps try to mock up before/after
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 03:15:42PM -0500, Jeff Lane wrote:
One question would be whether Twitter would be happy with us or not
for adding who knows how many new clients at once (thinking of
number of installs done within the first 2 weeks of a release)
that's a huge hit to Twitter's service
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 08:32:35AM +, Paul Sladen wrote:
I think it's an excellent idea to streamline the Grub menu. Could you
perhaps try to mock up before/after screenshots, so that it's clear
each change that you'd like to make?
As the Ubuntu GRUB maintainer I'd prefer text. Since we
Am 18.01.2012 12:43, schrieb Colin Watson:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 08:32:35AM +, Paul Sladen wrote:
I think it's an excellent idea to streamline the Grub menu. Could you
perhaps try to mock up before/after screenshots, so that it's clear
each change that you'd like to make?
As the Ubuntu
Denis Washington writes:
- The Ubuntu entries as the kernel version (Ubuntu, with kernel
3.2.0-9...) that do not relate to anything that we usually present
the user. It would be much nicer if we had the actual Ubuntu version
stand there instead, so that the entry just becomes Ubuntu 12.04.
Also, on my system (as well as many others), I end up with 2 lines for
Windows 7 (or Vista, when I was using that)--only one of which boots. One
is the system partition; one is the main partition. Fixing this by hand
wouldn't be such a big deal if one didn't have to write part of a shell
script
I share this concern; our sysadmins had some visualisations of 11.10
installs hitting the Ubuntu geoip service around release time, and
although I forget the numbers the spike was pretty huge.
Given our scale, I'd say that the neighbourly thing to do is for Ubuntu
installs to only touch
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:37:20PM -0800, Dane Mutters wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
Given our scale, I'd say that the neighbourly thing to do is for Ubuntu
installs to only touch Ubuntu network resources. However, that isn't to
say that an Ubuntu service couldn't deal with fetching a set of
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 13:37 -0800, Dane Mutters wrote:
and have it propagate wherever it's needed
without bombarding Twitter with installer traffic.
One marketing idea was to put gwibber dbus bindings into ubiquity so
people could post to twitter that they were installing Ubuntu.
A sort of
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 08:16:32PM -0500, Martin Owens wrote:
One marketing idea was to put gwibber dbus bindings into ubiquity so
people could post to twitter that they were installing Ubuntu.
A sort of Hey tell you friends type idea. It didn't happen I thinkf or
technical reasons.
I'd
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 01:28 +, Colin Watson wrote:
Fetching something from the network and rendering it as part of the
slideshow is much easier
Yes, technical problems. Pulling in the gwibber stack itself isn't
really required, it's a matter of loading the service (dbus) and then
hijacking
11 matches
Mail list logo
