On Thu, 6 May 2010 00:58:36 -0400, Ryan Oram wrote:
>
> I apologize if I was frank, but problem with PulseAudio is that it
> does not always work with existing code.
>
Yes, this is true. But again, the problem is with the existing code, not
PulseAudio. If we are going to simply give up whenever
On Wed, 5 May 2010 21:52:25 -0400, Ryan Oram wrote:
> Emulators are a subset of games. They use the same libraries and
> frameworks. If they do not work, games will not likely not work.
>
If they do not work, it is more likely that the game is broken in its
usage of the underlying hardware than P
On Wed, 5 May 2010 18:44:02 -0400, Ryan Oram wrote:
> Ubuntu needs a change in direction.
Is that so? Now back up your claim with something substantial and maybe,
just maybe, someone might buy your argument. I will say, however, that
you have an up-hill battle.
If you are going to propose sweepi
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:57:10 -0300, Flávio Etrusco
wrote:
> IIRC Fedora lowered the number of login terminals for reasons other
> than process/memory overhead - though I can't remember what reasons
> were from the top of my head ;-)
> BTW, does a terminal allocate any video memory when using KMS
Excerpts from Patrick Goetz's message of Fri Mar 05 13:27:52 -0500 2010:
> So of course it only took a little digging to discover that smbd and
> nmbd are now services started separately, and that (bizarrely) there is
> now a winbind daemon which is still started from /etc/init.d, but
> neverthe
Excerpts from Brett Mahar's message of Thu Feb 04 20:00:19 -0500 2010:
>
> Is it still necessary to even have releases every 6 months? How many
> more new features/changes need to be made to the OS? It seems pretty
> well developed as-is.
>
You are kidding, right? It amazes me that someone would
Excerpts from Amahdy's message of Wed Jan 27 21:19:30 -0500 2010:
> If other developers put sometime to make life easier (and faster) for us.
> There is a user interface, a browser, an email client ..etc, then only
> because I like the keyboard I'll use terminal?? I do like terminal and I use
> it
Excerpts from Amahdy's message of Wed Jan 27 21:40:21 -0500 2010:
> >* >Mailing lists are the lifeblood of most open source projects.
> > *>*
> > *>* Always wondering why!! why not move on to a *group*
> > *>*
> > *A better question would be why _should we_ move on to a "group." I see
> > no clear
Excerpts from Amahdy's message of Wed Jan 27 21:19:30 -0500 2010:
> If other developers put sometime to make life easier (and faster) for us.
> There is a user interface, a browser, an email client ..etc, then only
> because I like the keyboard I'll use terminal?? I do like terminal and I use
> it
Excerpts from Ben Gamari's message of Wed Jan 27 20:59:36 -0500 2010:
Excerpts from Amahdy's message of Wed Jan 27 20:01:09 -0500 2010:
> >Because what we have works very well and doesn't rely on an external entity.
>
> We all know that there is "no bug free software", so if mailman is very good,
Excerpts from Amahdy's message of Wed Jan 27 13:47:52 -0500 2010:
> Many Open-Source communities use this kind of mailman mailing-lists
> I feel missing something here but really wondering why? even for new
> projects like Ubuntu (founded 2004 which is new to know other alternative
> technologies)
It seems that as of gcc-4 (or on the Ubuntu timeline, Intrepid), g77 has
been superseded by gfortran. Unfortunately, it seems that the gfortran
packaging was not updated to account for this fact: gfortran does not
provide an alternative for f77. I believe this should not be the case,
as according t
12 matches
Mail list logo
