Hi,
I have a sound system from Teufel (Concept C 200) which has a built in
USB sound card and an analogue aux input. When I connect the USB cable
to my computer and the aux cable to my radio, then the sound of the
radio does not play. When I unplug the USB cable the sound from the
radio
.
Regards
Lanoxx
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Lanoxx
On 01/02/13 12:58, Frank Mertens wrote:
Hi, Linoxx!
I was also fighting with the brother drivers some days ago (but on 13.04,
MFC295CN).
Nearly started disassembling their packages. Found in the end (and I remembered
doing same mistake before), that I forgot to install dependencies
On 27/01/13 17:33, Lanoxx wrote:
When I tried to install it on my local system just now I was told this:
dpkg: error processing libglib2.0-0:amd64 (--install):
package libglib2.0-0:amd64 2.34.1-1ubuntu2 cannot be configured
because libglib2.0-0:i386 is at a different version (2.34.1-1ubuntu1
that no .deb package was generated, right? Do I need to do
something to set up the chroots?
Regerds
Lanoxx
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
On 27/01/13 17:21, Emmet Hikory wrote:
Lanoxx wrote:
thanks a lot for this explanation. I tried it and everything works
until the last step. When I run sbuild, then it get a warning like
this:
W: No chroots are defined in ‘/etc/schroot/schroot.conf’ or
‘/etc/schroot/chroot.d’
And the build
Hi,
I have a question regarding the options that are used to build the
source code of a package, there are often some options that can be
passed to either ./autogen.sh or ./configure which influence what module
are build or how a libarary or program is build. How can I find out
which options
On 18/01/13 14:57, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 02:05:47PM +0100, Lanoxx wrote:
On 17/01/13 13:40, Oliver Grawert wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 17.01.2013, 13:11 +0100 schrieb Lanoxx:
it seems that for solaris there exists a man page for types.h [1] but I
could not find such a man
Hi,
it seems that for solaris there exists a man page for types.h [1] but I
could not find such a man page on ubuntu. Could someone give me a hint,
why it does not exist or is the man page name just different on ubuntu?
Regards
Lanoxx
[1] http://www.unix.com/man-page/opensolaris/3head
On 17/01/13 13:40, Oliver Grawert wrote:
hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 17.01.2013, 13:11 +0100 schrieb Lanoxx:
Hi,
it seems that for solaris there exists a man page for types.h [1] but I
could not find such a man page on ubuntu. Could someone give me a hint,
why it does not exist or is the man page
-find-scanner, scanimage, xsane,
simple-scan, brsaneconfig2, to no avail. I have a DCP-560CN which is
using the generation 2 drivers.
Kind Regards
Lanoxx
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman
?
Regards
Lanoxx
On 17/12/12 07:53, Robie Basak wrote:
This should auto sync. In fact, it already has:
libicu-dev | 4.8.1.1-3 | precise | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, powerpc
libicu-dev | 4.8.1.1-8 | quantal | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, powerpc
libicu-dev | 4.8.1.1-10 |raring
:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687339
Kind Regards
Lanoxx
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
/gtk+/commit/?h=gtk-3-6id=4c67e71c63aca1770a6a486c30653f831a0191bd
So either I did a mistake and looked at the wrong source in Ubuntu [1]
or for some reason this commit was not synced properly from upstream.
Could anyone clarify this please?
Kind Regards
Lanoxx
[1]
https://code.launchpad.net
Hi Stefano,
On 11/09/12 22:17, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Hi Lanoxx (2012.09.11_21:34:23_+0200)
The other question is: What would be required to get this into Ubuntu?
You'd release it, and then, ideally, you would encourage one the Debian
tilda maintainers to upload it. (Presumably to experimental
it.
I have two questions now. First, is there anyone who likes tilda and
wants to test it a bit? You can find the source at
https://github.com/lanoxx/tilda in the master branch. I would be happy
to receive some feedback.
The other question is: What would be required to get this into Ubuntu?
Ubuntu
getting too high, so there is not
actually a new architecture or a any huge changes in 3.0. Because of
this I dont think there are any books explicitly written for 3.x.
Regards
Lanoxx
On 08/09/12 11:48, Navdeep Singh Sidhu wrote:
Hello,
i want to know that is there any e book avail
be great if you could merge them too. Im looking forward to
finally see a new tilda release in Quantal.
Best Regards and Thanks alot
Lanoxx
On 27/08/12 12:27, Tristan Sloughter
wrote:
Hey, I will take a look at this and get a release out.
On Thu
Test, my mail client should send this as plain text now.
Timothy, can you confirm please?
On 24/08/12 09:59, Lanoxx wrote:
Timothy,
I have never had this issue before. Are you sure this is not a problem
of your email client?
Regards
Lanoxx
On 24/08/12 07:57, Timothy Arceri wrote:
Can
I see,
I would say that is a bug in the mailing list software then. ^^
On 25/08/12 14:31, Timothy Arceri wrote:
Hi Lanoxx,
That is much better :) No its not my email client I
have signed up to the list to get emails in Digest format rather than
getting each email
Timothy,
I have never had this issue before. Are you sure this is not a
problem of your email client?
Regards
Lanoxx
On 24/08/12 07:57, Timothy Arceri
wrote:
Can you please stop sending html
based emails
). The last update
in trunk contains a merge from github which happenend in April. So
my question is, could someone please
update the tilda version for quantal so that it contains the
latest version?
Best Regards
Lanoxx
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu
it is ready to be used. I have been
using this very code since a few years now on my laptop. If you look
closely the changes on github from lanoxx have been merged five month
ago, but are infact much older. So the best thing would be to just
package it and deliver it, despide the fact that its not tagged
1. Print Dialog / Improving "Print to file" option
(Lanoxx)
2. Re: Print Dialog / Improving "Print to file" option
(Lanoxx)
3. Re: Print Dialog / Improving "
to the code for the Print to File Options. Maybe I could
even fix this myself.
Kind Regards
Lanoxx
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
On 15/08/12 20:27, Javier Jardón wrote:
On 15 August 2012 23:08, Lanoxx lan...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
Then the filename says output.pdf which any sane person will probably want
to change. So I have to type the file name and then also add .pdf again and
finally I can click Print.
FYI
configuration tool is
still available as system-config-printer (if i remember correctly)
there is not even a way to configure the default page size.
Cheers
Lanoxx
On 07/04/2012 13:52, Dane Mutters wrote:
I'm not keen on getting involved in a debate, but since this issue
affects my ability
On 03/04/12 10:26, Vernon Cole wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Rodney Dawes rodney.da...@ubuntu.com
mailto:rodney.da...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Ditën e Mon, 02/04/2012 më 13.57 -0600, Vernon Cole ka shkruar:
So there it is. All we want is all the new stuff -- along with
at: http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/kile this
bug should also be present on precise.
Best Regards
Lanoxx
[1] http://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=20t=91951
[2]
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/43779/kile-will-not-work-on-ubuntu-utf8x-def/48272#48272
Hi Martin,
thanks for the reply I have contacted the original developer on
sourceforge and asked him to merge the patches. If he declines or does
not answer, then I will propose to make lp:tilda the new upstream branch.
Regards
Lanoxx
On 29/02/12 00:34, Martin Pool wrote:
On 29 February
disappointing they are just lying around for such a long time already.
So is there any chance they can be merged? And if not could some one at
least leave about what needs to be changed so the branch can get merged?
Best Regards
Lanoxx
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss
When using the gnome fallback mode there is no more System menu as is
used to be with Gnome 2. Some of the items that used to be in System-
(Preferences | Administration) are now in the Gnome System Settings but
the remaining ones are now in the application menu under a section
called Other. This
freeze of Ubuntu? Or is the only way to get this
into Ubuntu by first getting it into Debian?
Feedback is appreciated.
Thanks,
Lanoxx
[1] https://github.com/lanoxx/window-picker-applet
[2]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/window-picker-applet/+bug/356980
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing
working on getting rid of the remaining deprecated functions
but if any one wants to take a look you can just clone the git
repository on Github. I included a readme file so it should not be
difficult to compile and install it:
https://github.com/lanoxx/window-picker-applet
Let me know you someone
Hi,
The discussion of /usr vs. / has also been in debian and the general
consens seemed to be that fedoras use case is not applicable to debian
because it would break compatibility with systems that dont have an
initramfs. It would also be neccessary to move tools such as fsck and
others into
35 matches
Mail list logo
