On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed. Our only difference of opinion is whether or not a concerned
user should take a bit of responsibility himself.
Yes, but saying We could offer you the option, but simply won't, so instead
you have to pull the
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 7:35 AM, nergar ner...@gmail.com wrote:
Tim Hawkins wrote:
Connecting and transferring data online during an offline media install
is not an expected activity,
No? why not? Its just getting updates!
It doesn't really matter what it *is* just doing, what (only)
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 8:43 AM, nergar ner...@gmail.com wrote:
YES, we should disable OS updates by default for n00bs just because a
paranoid user made a comment. Very intelligent.
Now you're being paranoid.
No one said something about disabling it by default, it's merely about
bringing it
Looks to me like a matter of upstream, since Python3k is not compatible with
previous versions of Python 2.x.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since Python 3 was released, how is Ubuntu going to transition it's PyGTK
apps to 3.0?
Most GNOME (and Ubuntu-centric)
Thanks Colin.
Regards,
M.
2008/9/23 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 06:35:29PM +0200, Milosz Derezynski wrote:
Thanks for the replies, i actually wasn't aware there is a separate list
for
development; now I understand what ubuntu-devel-DISCUSS means.
Here's
Hello,
I wanted to bring the GtkAdjustment regression bug to the attention of
Ubuntu developers.
The problem is described very well by the commenters in this bug:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=551740
Please take the time to read all of the bug comments, this is important.
In short:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 17:42 +0200, Milosz Derezynski wrote:
I've attached a patch against Gtk+ 2.14.1 which reverts the
GtkAdjustment behaviour to how it has been in Gtk+ 2.12 and prior.
Check the changelog for libgtk+2 It's been reverted already.
--
Mackenzie Morgan
Even if it not neccessarily useless, cases are certainly imaginable where
this logging is not desired from a privacy point of view.
((R)om, sorry for the double-post)
2008/9/13 (R)om [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Every action taken is logged in ~/.recently-used and ~/.recently-used.xbel.
It should be
I also don't understand the reasoning behind this. If anything then it feels
like adding another layer of obscurity.
Binaries HAVE names. There's just no way around it. The fact that MOST of
the time, a user doesn't need it (the menu item) shouldn't be used as
justification that for the few cases
Specify both packages at the command line at the same time, e.g. with apt:
apt-get install libstdc++6-4.2-dev g++-4.2.deb
2008/6/21 Nguyễn Hồng Quân [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In order to install g++-4.2.deb, I have to have already had
libstdc++6-4.2-dev. But to install libstdc++6-4.2-dev.deb, the
.
2008/6/10 Christopher James Halse Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 19:54 +0200, Milosz Derezynski wrote:
Sorry for dropping in.
Has there been any mention of Microsoft that they will never, ever sue
anyone who uses Mono nor the Mono developers themselves, or is this
all
Sorry for dropping in.
Has there been any mention of Microsoft that they will never, ever sue
anyone who uses Mono nor the Mono developers themselves, or is this all
under the Novell/Microsoft convenant? If they never made such a statement,
on what else than pure hope that they will never
But clearly this issue can be seen as a limitation of the FAT filesystem,
just not yet imposed at the highest level of the filesystem driver (kernel
or userland)?
Surely ext3 *would* allow a slash in a filename (i guess?), if the userland
tools would just let the filesystem driver ever receive
is
an evident sign of a problem, then being able to skip this item within
update-manager or synaptic would be great I think.
2008/5/6 Andrew Sayers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Milosz Derezynski wrote:
It could work if after the package is skipped apt recreates the
dependency list; this might be bad to oversee
It could work if after the package is skipped apt recreates the dependency
list; this might be bad to oversee though (especially without a GUI),
however adding a printout a la These packages were originally meant to be
installed: $PACKAGES Since package $PACKAGE was removed after the update
began,
OK i was able to fix it; the fix is that i've deinstall samba and
libpam-smbpass altogether, now adding a printer and printing works again.
However i was already compiling samba from source to give it a try with gdb,
i think i'll just continue and see what this will come up with.
2008/4/30
OK great seems it's a heisenbug or the samba source for Ubuntu/Debian is
different from the vanilla samba source; using samba installed from source
with identical configure options (version 3.0.28a) doesn't crash cupsd.
2008/4/30 Milosz Derezynski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OK i was able to fix
Yes same for me, on the Live CD the printer was basically immediately
usable.
I've been running this system as Gutsy before, and updated to Hardy in a
very early phase (4 Months before the release i think), could some gradual
updates caused a misconfiguration of the system? If yes, what in
I agree, but it should be no big problem to write a new one. It should be
pretty cleat to see looking from the outside that a small window sliding the
windows through with at best 3 of them visible at a given time is not a very
usable window switcher when you have more than 2 or 3 windows opened
I can confirm this problem, morphology is identical to your problem's, the
printer is a HP LaserJet 2100 (if matters).
2008/4/26 Thomas Novin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello
I have a problem with printing in Hardy. My bug has not been processed
yet but I reported it two weeks ago.
Now i've removed the printer and trying to reinstall it causes cupsd to
crash everytime, i can't print at all which is a medium-sized problem atm..
is there anything we can do?
2008/4/27 Milosz Derezynski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I can confirm this problem, morphology is identical to your problem's
OK ISO download is underway
2008/4/27 Conrad Knauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Milosz Derezynski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can confirm this problem, morphology is identical to your problem's,
the
printer is a HP LaserJet 2100 (if matters).
FWIW, I just tested
I second that, it's quite non-intrusive and can be seen (or rather is)
a one-time installation option per new user.
On 9/27/07, Dominik Wagenfuehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
most users welcome the decision to activate Compiz by default. But
others are a little bit unhappy with it [1][2].
23 matches
Mail list logo
