Andrew Sayers ha scritto:
What I'd like to raise - how does one write such a database, when there
is no clear-cut answer on whether this card, with this driver, works?
Since we're talking about regressions here, one solution would be to
make downgrading as easy as upgrading, and to request
Scott Kitterman ha scritto:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:14:31 -0500 Mackenzie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I haven't bothered trying to use the GUI with my iwl4965 and WEP. I
just expect NM to not work when it comes to WEP.
I have 4965 and it worked fine for me with KNetworkManager and
Moins,
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 02:27 +, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
On 11/11/2008 Scott Kitterman wrote:
I would encourage you (and others, you certainly aren't the only one)
to hold
your temper and if you can't say something helpful, just take your
hands off
the keyboard. Being
If a distributor adds more goodies to the kernel, then be happy, but
that doesn't mean, that it really works...even when the distributor puts
the hardware on the list of supported hardware.
I hope this is not really the idea of the ubuntu developers on this
topic, because if so, then I can
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 09:00 +, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
If a distributor adds more goodies to the kernel, then be happy, but
that doesn't mean, that it really works...even when the distributor puts
the hardware on the list of supported hardware.
I hope this is not really the
Sarah - this should make sense on its own, but it builds on an idea I
suggested in
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2008-November/006250.html
which you might provide a little background to this post.
3) There are plenty of other hardware regressions by which I am affected
Canonical does provide Support for Ubuntu for You, when you want to
pay
it. If not, fix it yourself, or help us fixing it e.g. join the irc
and
point people to it. If people can't help you directly, because of not
having the broken hardware, you can try to provide this hardware to
the
Am 13.11.2008 um 10:32 schrieb Stephan Hermann:
But reality told me different.
Stephan, your points about the unfortunate truth are valid.
Nevertheless, software quality is one of the keys to success.
I've just filed the second bug where one of the Gnome applets
segfaults in a standard
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:00:36 + Vincenzo Ciancia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If a distributor adds more goodies to the kernel, then be happy, but
that doesn't mean, that it really works...even when the distributor puts
the hardware on the list of supported hardware.
I hope this is not
Stephan Hermann wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 11:56 +0100, Markus Hitter wrote:
- Allow downgrades. This should help narrowing potential causes of
the trouble.
This is something I don't understand.
When I upgrade to a new release, I always think (or is it knowing): Ok,
for the next 4
2008/11/13 Andrew Sayers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stephan Hermann wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 11:56 +0100, Markus Hitter wrote:
- Allow downgrades. This should help narrowing potential causes of
the trouble.
This is something I don't understand.
When I upgrade to a new release, I
On Thursday 13 November 2008 05:13, Andrew Sayers wrote:
Sarah - this should make sense on its own, but it builds on an idea I
suggested in
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2008-November/006250
.html
which you might provide a little background to this post.
3) There
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 20:36 +1100, Sarah Hobbs wrote:
Take the intel 3945 card, for example. Vincenzo says it doesn't work
for him, under various modes. Various users on the forums have also
mentioned that their systems don't work with these cards.
However, other users on the forums,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Mackenzie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 20:36 +1100, Sarah Hobbs wrote:
Take the intel 3945 card, for example. Vincenzo says it doesn't work
for him, under various modes. Various users on the forums have also
mentioned that their
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 21:58 +0100, Nicolas Deschildre wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Mackenzie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 20:36 +1100, Sarah Hobbs wrote:
Take the intel 3945 card, for example. Vincenzo says it doesn't work
for him, under various modes.
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 21:58 +0100, Nicolas Deschildre wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Mackenzie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 20:36 +1100, Sarah Hobbs wrote:
Take the intel 3945 card, for example. Vincenzo says it doesn't work
for him, under various modes.
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:14:31 -0500 Mackenzie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I haven't bothered trying to use the GUI with my iwl4965 and WEP. I
just expect NM to not work when it comes to WEP.
I have 4965 and it worked fine for me with KNetworkManager and WEP in
Hardy. I have't had a need
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 21:12 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:14:31 -0500 Mackenzie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I haven't bothered trying to use the GUI with my iwl4965 and WEP. I
just expect NM to not work when it comes to WEP.
I have 4965 and it worked fine for
On 11/11/2008 Scott Kitterman wrote:
I would encourage you (and others, you certainly aren't the only one)
to hold
your temper and if you can't say something helpful, just take your
hands off
the keyboard. Being angry, contemptuous, and disrespectful won't get
your
bugs fixed
On 11/11/2008 Andrew Sayers wrote:
I'd like to hear Vincenzo's take on this, but it sounds to me like the
bugs here are:
If you ask for it, I reply but try to be concise. It is much simpler
than that:
1) One bug is there since more than one year (VGA out) and it is
affecting many people that
I feel your pain, a colleague of mine who was an administrator in my
erst-while company. We had 100 desktops and we had close to 100 odd
developer desktops switched to ubuntu. We had also made an apt-mirror
to get updates but most of the time the updates were not used.
Reason :- The admin had to
On 11/11/2008 Felipe Figueiredo wrote:
The kind of rant that started this thread
is not only uncalled for, but in fact counterproductive. Not to
mention
these particular ones are unfair, incorrect and (as noted by several
others) exaggerated. He was not asking if he was the one of many, he
On Tuesday 11 November 2008 10:47, Luke L wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Martin Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This list was created to give users a way to discuss Ubuntu development
with developers. Comments like I was just joking about you having to
know anything make the
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 09:47 -0600, Luke L wrote:
On a practical note, it isn't as if this ML is getting flooded with
hundreds of messages of traffic a day. For those who could benefit
from the technical discussions and user input, I don't see why someone
would disconnect themselves from that
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Martin Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This list was created to give users a way to discuss Ubuntu development with
developers. Comments like I was just joking about you having to know
anything make the decision to unsubscribe easy. I'm seriously considering
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:03 AM, Martin Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This list was created to give users a way to discuss Ubuntu development with
developers. Comments like I was just joking about you having to know
anything make the decision to unsubscribe easy. I'm seriously considering
On Monday 10 November 2008 18:14, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
On 10/11/2008 Bryce Harrington wrote:
You should know them very well :) In fact you were assigned to
the
case some point in time between winter and spring, or at least
these
were the words of somebody on the
This list was created to give users a way to discuss Ubuntu development with
developers. Comments like I was just joking about you having to know
anything make the decision to unsubscribe easy. I'm seriously considering
it myself.
It should remain, developers should remain. Developers
28 matches
Mail list logo
