This needs some style changes for sure ;-) ... which I'm tackling.
As was said at the meeting on Sunday, the new style will more closely
resemble that of ubuntu.com, and with it will come some needed changes
in layout - including the individual entries on the "Get" page.
~Dan
On 4/2/07, Martin A
As promised, I started loading all the content to the DIY website.
I've already gone through the "Get" section, but for some reason, it
doesn't seem to look to organized.
http://diy.devubuntu.com/get.php
Thoughts?
Martin
--
ubuntu-marketing mailing list
ubuntu-marketing@lists.ubuntu.com
Modif
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Buch wrote:
>> I've uploaded all the structural changes to diy.devubuntu.com.
>> It seems some changed were made to the images that differ from the
>> version I had, so I'm leaving the "index.php" for Dan to fix ;D
>> I'll be working on the bac
> I've uploaded all the structural changes to diy.devubuntu.com.
> It seems some changed were made to the images that differ from the
> version I had, so I'm leaving the "index.php" for Dan to fix ;D
> I'll be working on the backend to get the howto's working dynamically.
Thanks, Martin! I know
I've uploaded all the structural changes to diy.devubuntu.com.
It seems some changed were made to the images that differ from the
version I had, so I'm leaving the "index.php" for Dan to fix ;D
I'll be working on the backend to get the howto's working dynamically.
Happy new years to all.
Martin
On 12/11/06, Daniel Buch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, not to confuse things any further, but I just bzr pushed a new
> revision :-) Some of the things you've changed with styles to the
> main page were nearly identical to what I just worked on, with some
> small differences (figures :-P )
Well, not to confuse things any further, but I just bzr pushed a new
revision :-) Some of the things you've changed with styles to the
main page were nearly identical to what I just worked on, with some
small differences (figures :-P ) ...
Either way, if you're willing to keep a copy of the site
> I liked the title bigger, and perhaps the 4 icons a bit bigger too...
> BUT, I really like the :: layout, as oposed to the vertical one.
Well, I've never used gimp in my life, so I spent half the time trying
to figure out how gimp does things differently then Photoshop.
Maybe this is better?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for the feedback everyone :)
Dan, could you please change:
"Documentation of other projects to show how profitable/risky/easy this is."
to
"Guidance in producing material en masse for resale to the community."
"Database of people offering mat
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 08:02:18 -0500
"Daniel Buch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The diy website is ready for another round of criticism:
> http://diy.devubuntu.com
>
Things go quite badly wrong in firefox with a narrow window (or low
res screen): things disappear further left than y
I like it a lot too! :)
- Cody A.W. Somerville
On 12/9/06, Richard Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 08 December 2006 07:02, Daniel Buch wrote:
| Hello all,
|
| The diy website is ready for another round of criticism:
| http://diy.devubuntu.com
|
| Cheers,
| Dan
Dan,
Wow! I really
On Friday 08 December 2006 07:02, Daniel Buch wrote:
| Hello all,
|
| The diy website is ready for another round of criticism:
| http://diy.devubuntu.com
|
| Cheers,
| Dan
Dan,
Wow! I really like the layout and the look. It is clean and fun. Keep up the
good work!
--
.:Richard Johnson
.:[EMAIL
> Swag is good; the icons & colour scheme are great - obviously related to the
> main Ubuntu sites, but a bit friendlier and less formal.
I used Tango SVG to make the icons - anybody able to quickly tell me
about if/how an attribution should be included?
> One minor typographical nitpick - in the
> I love it! I still have my qualm about the brown boxes on the right
> splitting the headers into two, however; but I think it's great progress
> anyway.
:-) boxes will be changed back to include un-severed headers.
Thanks for the feedback! Dan ...want ...more ...feedback
--
ubuntu-mark
On 12/8/06, Toby Smithe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ooh ooh! Forgot to mention, I love the use of the term "swag".
Swag is good; the icons & colour scheme are great - obviously related to the
main Ubuntu sites, but a bit friendlier and less formal.
One minor typographical nitpick - in the "a
Ooh ooh! Forgot to mention, I love the use of the term "swag".
Fantastic.
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 23:43 +, Toby Smithe wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 13:57 -0500, Daniel Buch wrote:
> > Thanks again, and keep the criticism coming!
>
> Will do!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [sp
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 13:57 -0500, Daniel Buch wrote:
> Thanks again, and keep the criticism coming!
Will do!
[space for suspense]
I love it! I still have my qualm about the brown boxes on the right
splitting the headers into two, however; but I think it's great progress
a
Thanks for the feedback Martin!
You practically read my mind with the layout of the 4 big links. This
will be included in the next revision.
As far as the Safari/Konquerer rendering is concerned, I'm fairly
certain I know what's causing that - the positioning right now is
really just a hacked tog
Hello all,
The diy website is ready for another round of criticism:
http://diy.devubuntu.com
Cheers,
Dan
--
ubuntu-marketing mailing list
ubuntu-marketing@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-marketing
19 matches
Mail list logo
