Launchpad username change for me

Hi, My username on Launchpad is now 'lucas', not 'nussbaum'. Many thanks to Lucas Vieites (lucasvieites on launchpad for letting me use 'lucas'). /me feels like himself gain :-) Lucas -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

Re: debsecan in Ubuntu

Am Dienstag, den 17.01.2006, 20:05 +0100 schrieb Florian Weimer: > I see you've somehow included the debsecan package in Ubuntu: > > > > In order to work properly, debsecan needs detailed vulnerability > information--which is currently not

early UVF exception request: childsplay/childsplay-plugins

Hi, I'd like to request an exception for UVF for childsplay/childsplay-plugins. Rationale: The latest upstream release(s) not yet in ubuntu have been two bugfix releases, one made just today. That means, that the debian package won't be available before UVF. I don't want to diverge from debian

Re: debsecan in Ubuntu

Hey, On Wednesday 18 January 2006 13:43, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 17.01.2006, 20:05 +0100 schrieb Florian Weimer: > > I see you've somehow included the debsecan package in Ubuntu: > > > > > > > > In order to work properly

Re: debsecan in Ubuntu

On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 13:43 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 17.01.2006, 20:05 +0100 schrieb Florian Weimer: > > I see you've somehow included the debsecan package in Ubuntu: > > > > > > > > In order to work properly, debs

Re: debsecan in Ubuntu

* Stephan Hermann: > Well, if someone can give me a hint, why it shouldn't work on > ubuntu? There is no database which maps CVE names to the Ubuntu package version where the bug has been fixed (or, if it hasn't been fixed, the affected Ubuntu package). Of course, you could blindly use the datab

Re: debsecan in Ubuntu

* Jamie Jones: > Florian, would you happen to have instructions on how to generate this > data ? The data is maintained by Debian's testing security team. The Python application which generates the input data for debsecan is available from the secure-testing Subversion repository. By design, it

Re: debsecan in Ubuntu

Hi! Jamie Jones [2006-01-19 1:36 +1100]: > Martin, assuming we can generate a data feed, what do you think ? Would > you use it ? I already have a per-release data feed at [1] (source code is linked at the bottom of the page), so this might be suitable as input for that package. For my current s

Packaging of new upstream versions in Ubuntu

Hi, I noticed that some MOTUs package new upstream releases without notifying the Debian maintainer. Just to help understand the problem, an example of suchregularly package is gparted, whose debian version is 0.0.9-1, while the current universe version is 0.1-0ubuntu1. Such work is nice, but pl

Re: Packaging of new upstream versions in Ubuntu

Hi Lucas, please check which repository this is in. Main packages are handled a bit differently. All main developers can and have to package actual and more stable software in a shorter ammount of time. They can't wait for Debian most of the time. But, please think, that most main devs are Debi

Re: Packaging of new upstream versions in Ubuntu

On 18/01/06 at 18:53 +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > please check which repository this is in. > > Main packages are handled a bit differently. > All main developers can and have to package actual and more stable software > in > a shorter ammount of time. They can't wait for Debia

Re: Packaging of new upstream versions in Ubuntu

Hello, Am Mittwoch, den 18.01.2006, 18:53 +0100 schrieb Stephan Hermann: > please check which repository this is in. as discussed in #ubuntu-motu - it was *my* call to refer to it, because it's 'my' package and was my 'fault'. :-) Have a nice day, Daniel signature.asc Description: Dies ist e

XUL Motu team?

Hi, I've been playing around with the mozilla-provided binaries of a number of apps not in the Ubuntu repositories: seamonkey, sunbird and xulrunner. There's also a couple of third-party xul apps I've been trying: flock[0] and etna[1]; and I guess many will have heard about the as-yet unreleas

Re: Packaging of new upstream versions in Ubuntu

> On Wednesday 18 January 2006 18:41, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > Such work is nice, but please notify the Debian maintainer that you > > packaged the new upstream release: > > > > * duplication of work in the free software world is useless, we have > > enough to do. > > * this will make later me

Re: Packaging of new upstream versions in Ubuntu

On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 09:00:07PM -0600, Ming Hua wrote: > > I hope you only mean main packages here. For universe packages I > completely agree with Lucas, we should submit/follow-up "new upstream > version available" wishlist bug in Debian if we package -0ubuntuX > versions. After discussion