ti, 2009-01-06 kello 00:10 +0100, Khashayar Naderehvandi kirjoitti:
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/SupplementaryFiles#Man%20Pages
Thanks, that's exactly what I needed!
I'm gonna start off with some really basic man page then, just to get
it to the next step.
Excellent! The
Hi,
I'm looking for the NX server component. Does ubuntu 8.10 have a version?
Seems Nomachine has been down since the New Year, and I have a bad feeling they
went out of business or something.
Bryan.
_
Windows LiveTM: Keep your
Nomachine's website is up, and has been up. They are in business and
my company has frequent correspondence. I would check your ISP or
DNS.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Bryan Tanoue btan...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for the NX server component. Does ubuntu 8.10 have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everybody,
some of you will have noticed that the application processes of the MOTU
Council have been taking several weeks, even months in extreme cases and
we have been very unhappy with this status quo.
We identified a number of reasons for
Em 07-01-2009 16:07, Dustin Kirkland escreveu:
But, please, please, please let's add some minority element of
objectivity to the processes.
+1
That was my first complain when I first tried be a Motu (which I failed)
and never bothered to try again because of that and different sponsors
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Daniel Holbach
daniel.holb...@ubuntu.com wrote:
We feel that these changes are going to be a notable improvement and we
would like to hear your thoughts on them, so we can move to the new
format real soon now.
Hi Daniel (and MOTU Council)-
Thank you very much
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dustin Kirkland schrieb:
I really believe the MOTU and Core-Dev application processes would
greatly benefit from some minimal, objective criteria. It should be
perfectly clear that meeting these objective criteria will not be
sufficient, alone,
All,
I'm pleased to announce that after far too long a wait, Thierry
Carrez (Koon) is now a MOTU. Thierry has been working with the Server
and Java teams, and describes his goals as I am interested in making
Ubuntu Server a market-leader solution for servers in large companies,
by supporting
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 13:22, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Dustin Kirkland schrieb:
I really believe the MOTU and Core-Dev application processes would
greatly benefit from some minimal, objective criteria. It should be
perfectly clear that meeting these objective criteria will not be
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 12:14, Daniel Holbach wrote:
3) Use the wiki
Applications and endorsements shall be drafted on wiki pages, and
presented for review when complete. This will give you the chance to use
a template for the application, where we can make sure that most areas
for the
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 02:18:09PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 13:22, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Dustin Kirkland schrieb:
I really believe the MOTU and Core-Dev application processes would
greatly benefit from some minimal, objective criteria. It should be
Could an update to Gnomesword be included in the repositories?
Gnomesword on their website is up to version 2.4.1 and includes many
features not included in the version 2.2.3.
Note that an update to Biblememorizer will also be needed as
Biblememorizer version 0.5.2 seems to have some errors with
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 14:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
People like quantitative criteria because they can be applied without
judgement and with no perception of bias. Everyone has to wait 6
months, so
it's not unfair we say you need to wait too. I really think that
our
process is
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 13:46 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
For improving the process just for the skill-level consideration, what
I
would like to see is sort of a self-directed exercise workbook, with
sets of packaging, bug triage, testing, documentation, etc. tasks.
For
sponsorees with
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 07:44:16PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 19:24, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 13:46 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
For improving the process just for the skill-level consideration, what
I
would like to see is sort of a
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 13:22, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Dustin Kirkland schrieb:
I really believe the MOTU and Core-Dev application processes would
greatly benefit from some minimal, objective criteria. It should be
perfectly clear that meeting these objective
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 08:59:24PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 20:46, Bryce Harrington wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 07:44:16PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 19:24, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 13:46 -0800, Bryce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Kitterman schrieb:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 20:46, Bryce Harrington wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 07:44:16PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Here's a good list of questions for the workbook:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Ellery schrieb:
On the four points made by Daniel, I can agree with all but the fourth
being beneficial. The reason that different Membership Boards were
created was to allow those that are unable to attend CC meetings to
still apply for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Kitterman schrieb:
I would prefer that sponsors still send in their comments via mail. I think
that makes it clearer where the application stops and the sponsors words
start. Emails can (and should) be signed too.
We can make it clear in
20 matches
Mail list logo
