Re: Problem with the field "Description" of a package

2006-10-11 Thread Ming Hua
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 09:44:32AM +0200, Loïc Martin wrote: > Sorry, here it is. The debian/control file looks fine to me, and it's valid UTF-8. I didn't do any test building so can't say more. > On another note, I don't know how to recognize non-UTF8 characters :) The iconv tool should do tha

Problem with the field "Description" of a package

2006-10-11 Thread Loïc Martin
Sorry, here it is. On another note, I don't know how to recognize non-UTF8 characters :)On 10/11/06, Ming Hua < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 06:08:07PM +0200, Loïc Martin wrote: > I've managed to go through all the steps to create a signed ubuntu package,> but one : the field d

Re: Problem with the field "Description" of a package

2006-10-10 Thread Ming Hua
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 06:08:07PM +0200, Loïc Martin wrote: > I've managed to go through all the steps to create a signed ubuntu package, > but one : the field description of the resulting binary package doesn't > reflect the description in the file /debian/control. > My control file looks the sam

Problem with the field "Description" of a package

2006-10-10 Thread Loïc Martin
I've managed to go through all the steps to create a signed ubuntu package, but one : the field description of the resulting binary package doesn't reflect the description in the file /debian/control.My control file looks the same as the one in the previous package already in Dapper, and also has a