On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 09:07:55PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
I hope I'm not late to give my own feedback ;)
It's too late for last week's meeting wink but I've passed it on to
Julian and Bjorn to check where we stand; they may contact you for
further details. We will publish our
Hi!
I hope I'm not late to give my own feedback ;)
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I had an very interesting telephone conference yesterday with the
launchpad guys. They are currently considering what features launchpad
3.0 will have. They did send me a list of things they have on the
schedule and
Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
In reality [performance] was an overall goal, and one which we did
pursue with a
vengeance. The number of timeouts dropped to under 10 a day (!!) for the
whole site over the 3.0 release, and dozens of pages which issues O(n)
queries were fixed.
Cool! Sincere
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:45:51 -0300 Christian Robottom Reis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:38:02PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
The list Reinhard discussed with you was related to Bugs. I've taken
your second bits of feedback into account for our global priorities, but
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:03:24 +0200 Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The list Reinhard discussed with you was related to Bugs. I've taken
your second bits of feedback into account for our global priorities, but
signed PPAs were also his #1 pick
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:43:24 +0200 Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Christian Robottom Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A final note to MOTU specifically following upon the varied feedback
point I made above. We really do want your feedback. However, it makes
/my/ work much less
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:38:02PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
The list Reinhard discussed with you was related to Bugs. I've taken
your second bits of feedback into account for our global priorities, but
signed PPAs were also his #1 pick for the Soyuz list, so you're well
covered.
Was
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 02:41:22AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I idled in #Launchpad for quite somee time after the latest U/I shuffle. I
saw a lot of people show up to complain. I only saw two people (not
involved in Launchpad development) speak in favor of it. I've heard a lot
of
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 02:22:55PM -0700, Jonathan Marsden wrote:
I'm just a newcomer to the world of Ubuntu development and Launchpad,
but I agree 100%. When 'ordinary' pages in LP say things like:
at least 77 queries issued in 7.48 seconds
(that was for
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:28:02 -0300 Christian Robottom Reis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 02:41:22AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I idled in #Launchpad for quite somee time after the latest U/I shuffle.
I
saw a lot of people show up to complain. I only saw two people (not
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:11:01 -0300 Christian Robottom Reis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 06:04:21PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Personally, I think the user feedback that I'm seeing is very clear.
Unfortunately it doesn't seem to match up with what is already decided
so
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:23:06 -0300 Christian Robottom Reis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the other hand, the feedback I get,
despite me asking otherwise, doesn't really give me much to work on --
there is too much talking down our process, where what I am looking for
is more encouraging feedback.
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:23:06 -0300 Christian Robottom Reis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the other hand, the feedback I get,
despite me asking otherwise, doesn't really give me much to work on --
there is too much talking down our process, where what I am looking for
is
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 06:04:21PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Personally, I think the user feedback that I'm seeing is very clear.
Unfortunately it doesn't seem to match up with what is already decided so
it will likely be discounted and ignored.
Nothing is decided. We're only now
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 05:15:21PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
My current impression is that the list of specs is too long.
Thanks for following up and providing us with input. The point you make
above is dear to me -- we do really have lots of work to do. This ties
into another point you
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:11:25 -0300 Christian Robottom Reis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:03:29AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I understand that this was a very difficult task and as far as it goes,
I
like generally the list. I find it unfortunate that you limited your
Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The list Reinhard discussed with you was related to Bugs. I've taken
your second bits of feedback into account for our global priorities, but
signed PPAs were also his #1 pick for the Soyuz list, so you're well
covered.
Was there a request for input on
Christian Robottom Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've struggled with this over the past two years, and in less than a
year we will be open sourced. I understand that existing end-users are
very much affected by changes, but on the other hand, we need to change
Launchpad in order to make it
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Christian Robottom Reis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 05:15:21PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
My current impression is that the list of specs is too long.
Thanks for following up and providing us with input. The point you make
above is
Jordan Mantha wrote:
For us Launchpad is a *critical* tool
to our work, so in a lot of respects we're more interesting with
existing feature working well than adding new features. I'm personally
be more interested in getting Launchpad to do the basics/fundamentals
(uploading, bugs, speed)
Hello Kiko, hi fellow MOTUs,
This has taken significantly longer than I had expected, but find below
the prioritized select of the list the Launchpad developers gave me. I
tried to incorporate all comments from all submissions I got. Please
don't be too surprised to hear that I got rather few
I understand that this was a very difficult task and as far as it goes, I
like generally the list. I find it unfortunate that you limited your
response to prioritizing the list you were given as the Launchpad
developer's list does not include what I consider the most important issues
that
Hello kiko, hello fellow MOTUs
I did receive some answers, thanks to everyone who has contributed so
far, all your comments will get considered and used to compile a big
picture!
However, I'm sorry to say that I didn't manage to compile prioritised
list that the launchpad crew asked us to do,
Hello from the lp liaison,
(you are receiving this mail because you are either a member of the
motu-sru or motu-release team. A copy is also sent to
ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com)
I had an very interesting telephone conference yesterday with the
launchpad guys. They are currently considering
On Friday 01 August 2008 09:28:49 you wrote:
The most important from me is not on the list, and that would be to have the
source package information back on the bug page (as it was before).
Its pretty annoying having to change to other pages just to see if that
package is in universe or not,
Cesare Tirabassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 01 August 2008 09:28:49 you wrote:
The most important from me is not on the list, and that would be to have the
source package information back on the bug page (as it was before).
Its pretty annoying having to change to other pages just
On Friday 01 August 2008 12:50:29 you wrote:
Cesare Tirabassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This sounds rather like a bug than a spec to me. Is there already a
bugnumber for it? If not, can you please file a bug and tell me the number?
I have no idea if there is a bug already filed for this.
On Friday 01 August 2008 06:04, Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
On Friday 01 August 2008 09:28:49 you wrote:
The most important from me is not on the list...
All the others I don't really care about; they are mostly annoying things
lost in a sea of annoying things (which to me is a clear sign that
Hi,
I'm not a motu but I want to give my opinion on this. I tried several times
the revu
process but without success. This was because the review took so long (a
month)
that I always give up. I've uploaded azureus, synce (others related),
omnibook
(driver for my notebook), and the last were
Recent work on REVU already exists into linking it against the PPA (it's
almost at a working prototype stage, but I'm suffering a case of coders
block). We're already done work to link REVU, and Launchpad's logins, as
well as somewhat streamline the entire process.
Michael
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at
30 matches
Mail list logo
