On 16/04/2019 16.14, Robie Basak wrote:
> You could be fine declaring that a team exists but deferring the
> creation of anything representing that in Launchpad until later when
> it's actually needed if you prefer. Or you can create it in Launchpad
> now if you want to give it some firm basis.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 03:59:41PM +0200, Etienne Dysli Metref wrote:
> What's the best way to represent this in Launchpad?
> - Shall I create a new team on LP or rather claim the team
> https://launchpad.net/~pkg-shibboleth-devel ("Is this a team you run?")?
I asked, and was told "those are
On 16/04/2019 14.06, Robie Basak wrote:
> Note that Ubuntu developers may upload (to Ubuntu) without updating the
> VCS first. This is rather like an NMU in Debian, but more common. For
> example, in Ubuntu uploads needed for library transitions are generally
> driven from the library provider
[moving this thread over to ubuntu-motu@ from
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1822069]
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:28:58AM -, Etienne Dysli Metref wrote:
> IMHO, ideally, the Shibboleth packaging repositories over on salsa.d.o
> [1] should be the reference also for Ubuntu packaging. I can create an
0.86-2 fixes a bug making it a
candiate for SRU, dynamips does not and simply imports the new
It isn't a candidate for SRU since 13.10 shipped with 0.8.3, so 0.8.6
is a new upstream release.
upstream version, which would be a backport.
What would be the preferred method to handle
I took took over maintenance of the GNS3 package, I had to bump
the dependency on dynamips to version 0.8.4.
So I believe both packages would need to be updated to prevent the
dependency breaking.
The problem arises that whilst GNS3 0.86-2 fixes a bug making it a
candiate for SRU, dynamips does
Hello,
I'm pretty new to all of this (packaging for Ubuntu/Debian), but I
created a debdiff for a bug I encountered when installing Jaunty for my
girlfriend. I've build the package locally and in my PPA. SRU has been
subscribed to the bug, but so far I haven't received any updates (x-mas
and new
, which depends on
${apache:Depends}, and it needs a rebuild when a security/SRU upload of
apache2 is made.
With my experience in motu-sru, I remember requests were mainly for
packages in NBS list not managed in time for the release.
Hi,
Well i opened the bug for the recent apache2-mpm-itk
Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
I'd like to discuss possibly modifying the MOTU SRU process to allow a
wider group of individuals the ability to approve MOTU SRU requests that are
simply no change rebuilds. From my experience on the motu-sru team, I've
made a few observations: ~99.99% of rebuild
}, and it needs a rebuild when a security/SRU upload of
apache2 is made.
With my experience in motu-sru, I remember requests were mainly for
packages in NBS list not managed in time for the release.
--
. ''`. Luca Falavigna
: :' : Ubuntu MOTU Developer
`. `'` Debian Maintainer
Hello Folks,
I'd like to discuss possibly modifying the MOTU SRU process to allow a
wider group of individuals the ability to approve MOTU SRU requests that are
simply no change rebuilds. From my experience on the motu-sru team, I've
made a few observations: ~99.99% of rebuild requests pose
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Cody A.W.
Somervillecody-somervi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
So in the spirit of making life easier for everyone, I'd like to propose
allowing all MOTUs the ability to approve SRU requests that are no change
rebuilds. Optionally, we could also require that the MOTU
Steve Stalcup wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Cody A.W.
Somervillecody-somervi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
So in the spirit of making life easier for everyone, I'd like to propose
allowing all MOTUs the ability to approve SRU requests that are no change
rebuilds. Optionally, we could
://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fluid-soundfont/+bug/355864
(config file doesn't work)
I believe that this bug, due to its functionally inhibiting property
and its minor correction, to be worthy of SRU. However, I am not sure
of the procedure, having not worked directly in Ubuntu universe
Hi folks,
I need to end my short ride in the MOTU-SRU team, i apply with
the hope that i will have more time now since i wouldn't be at the
university anymore, but that didn't happen, i still doesn't have enough
time for that, work, the projects i have, the things i want to do
Hello,
after serving for two release cycles as a motu-sru team member, I
decided to leave this position open for another developer interested in
post-release activities.
Work pressure increased a lot lately and I was not able to process SRU
and MOTU activities as I did in recent past. motu-sru
On 2008-10-16 09:06:29 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Dear MOTU Council,
please consider appoint Devid Antonio Filoni (d.filoni on LP) and
Nicolas Valcarcel (nvalcarcel on LP) as new motu-sru members.
Devid's application and advocates:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/2008
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nicolas Valcárcel ha scritto:
I would like to apply for SRU team aswell, my daily work involves
working with the current stable release, so i think i can do o a good
job on it. I'm also interested in QA and security, which are some
things
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
Any progress on this? There are two applications open for the free positions.
A quick recap:
APPLICATIONS
As of today, there are two volunteers who applied to join motu-sru,
Devid Antonio Filoni (devfil) [1
As per the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Teams/KeyTeamPolicy wiki page
I advocate Nicolas's application as I think he will be an excellent
member of motu-sru team and I also know his work as I've looked at
some upload signed by him.
Devid Antonio Filoni
2008/10/2 Nicolas Valcárcel [EMAIL
Hi all,
Luca Falavigna wrote:
as of today, motu-sru [1] needs more volunteers to reach five team
members. Current members are Cody Somerville, John Dong and myself, so
we should nominate at least two new members to be ready to process SRU
requests for {uni,multi}verse at the time Intrepid
MOins,
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 13:33 -0500, Nicolas Valcárcel wrote:
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 20:11 +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
Ah, that's interesting. I of course assumed that it would be clear
that I'd
give it a suitable version number. Why must a package in -updates have
a
different
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 10:34 +0200, Stephan Hermann wrote:
from ubuntu4 - -updates - ubuntu4.1 ?
I mean this one ubuntu4 + 0.1 - ubuntu4.1
Please clarify.
BTW, what are you doing with -updates which needs to go to several
releases, where the source has the same version+revision?
For that i
2008/10/3 Stefan Potyra [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Hi Stefan
On Thursday 02 October 2008 22:25:16 Nicolas Valcárcel wrote:
I would like to apply for SRU team aswell, my daily work involves
working with the current stable release, so i think i can do o a good
job on it. I'm also interested in QA
2008/10/3 Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Friday 03 October 2008 08:01, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote:
2008/10/3 Stefan Potyra [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Hi Stefan
On Thursday 02 October 2008 22:25:16 Nicolas Valcárcel wrote:
I would like to apply for SRU team aswell, my daily work
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 19:23 +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
ok, what possible problems would both of you see with getting the
current
version into -updates?
Also, would you think that there are possible advantages of doing so?
An advantage would be that -updates is activated on most systems
Hi again,
On Friday 03 October 2008 19:47:24 Nicolas Valcárcel wrote:
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 19:23 +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
ok, what possible problems would both of you see with getting the
current
version into -updates?
Also, would you think that there are possible advantages of doing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Devid Antonio Filoni ha scritto:
I propose myself as motu-sru member.
I sponsored some SRU requests proposed by Devid and I didn't see issues
with them, so I second his candidature.
Regards,
- --
. ''`. Luca Falavigna
: :' : Ubuntu MOTU
I would like to apply for SRU team aswell, my daily work involves
working with the current stable release, so i think i can do o a good
job on it. I'm also interested in QA and security, which are some
things that will help me on this, so please consider this as my
application for the motu-sru
Hi,
On Thursday 02 October 2008 22:25:16 Nicolas Valcárcel wrote:
I would like to apply for SRU team aswell, my daily work involves
working with the current stable release, so i think i can do o a good
job on it. I'm also interested in QA and security, which are some
things that will help me
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 01:42 +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
speaking of it, I'm interested where you'd draw the border between
what should
go into -security and -updates.
For -security i will said updates that close CVE's, specially if that
involves medium to critical security fixes, the rest to
Hi Cody,
2008/9/28 Cody A.W. Somerville [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Devid,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Devid Antonio Filoni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I propose myself as motu-sru member. I have free time to also do
moru-sru works and I think I will do a good job. I've worked at some
Hi,
I propose myself as motu-sru member. I have free time to also do
moru-sru works and I think I will do a good job. I've worked at some
SRU, so I know the procedure and in some bug I've suggested if a bug
is a SRU or not (I'm unable to find links right now), etc...
My launchpad profile: https
Hi Devid,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Devid Antonio Filoni [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi,
I propose myself as motu-sru member. I have free time to also do
moru-sru works and I think I will do a good job. I've worked at some
SRU, so I know the procedure and in some bug I've suggested
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
as of today, motu-sru [1] needs more volunteers to reach five team
members. Current members are Cody Somerville, John Dong and myself, so
we should nominate at least two new members to be ready to process SRU
requests for {uni,multi}verse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luke Yelavich ha scritto:
I'm writing to announce that I have decided to step down from MOTU SRU.
Luke, thank you very much for your help so far!
Recently, Scott [1] and Stephan [2] left the team, a big thanks for your
contributions in the team
Luca Falavigna wrote:
Martin answered (I forgot to add him to CC, so I paste his reply here):
In fact we do update translations for main regularly post-release,
through the language packs. If those are standard .po updates and have
been tested, I'm ok with updating translations in universe
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 11:51:08 Luca Falavigna wrote:
motu-sru limits to Cody and me, actually.
Even if SRU work is smaller now if compared to the days following Hardy
release, there are some requests which need to be reviewed.
If there is a dare need for help, count me in.
Cesare
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 05:51, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Luke Yelavich ha scritto:
I'm writing to announce that I have decided to step down from MOTU SRU.
Luke, thank you very much for your help so far!
Recently, Scott [1] and Stephan [2] left the team, a big thanks for your
contributions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Kitterman ha scritto:
I'd also suggest we consider process changes to make it less overwhelming.
Right now it seems like motu-sru is expected to look at any bug that anyone
wants fixed in a stable release. I think it'd be better if motu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin answered (I forgot to add him to CC, so I paste his reply here):
In fact we do update translations for main regularly post-release,
through the language packs. If those are standard .po updates and have
been tested, I'm ok with updating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
I'm writing to announce that I have decided to step down from MOTU SRU. Due to
other areas of Ubuntu keeping my attention for a while, I am not helping out as
much as I'd like with MOTU, and feel that I'm letting the SRU process down, as
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Haas ha scritto:
This is the first time I'm filing an SRU request which closes multiple
bugs. The wiki page doesn't give clear instructions so I hope what I did
was OK :)
Having a SRU fixing multiple bugs is OK, given that you provide
Hello,
if someone from motu-sru has some spare time, it'd be nice if they could
take a look at bug 241402[1]. This SRU fixes a few bug in
mythbuntu-control-centre.
This is the first time I'm filing an SRU request which closes multiple
bugs. The wiki page doesn't give clear instructions so I hope
Hello MOTU, Contributors, and fellow MOTU-SRU members,
I quickly put together a wiki page for the MOTU SRU team to allow for us to
easily schedule meetings and keep track of issues we face along with the
resolutions we've arrived at. You can visit it and help make it more awesome
by directing
Cody A.W. Somerville ha scritto:
I quickly put together a wiki page for the MOTU SRU team
Great! Thanks Cody ;)
Along with getting this team page setup in the wiki, I'd like to see
about organizing a MOTU SRU meeting so that we can all touch base. How
does August 7th @ 1600 UTC sound
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:00:31PM EST, Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
Along with getting this team page setup in the wiki, I'd like to see about
organizing a MOTU SRU meeting so that we can all touch base. How does August
7th @ 1600 UTC sound
Moins,
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:37:43 +1000
Luke Yelavich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:32:50PM EST, Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
How about June 16th? (June 17th for Luke)
Sounds good to me.
So it's setteled...
16th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 10:03:10PM EST, Luca Falavigna wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cody A.W. Somerville ha scritto:
As for a meeting, I'd love to get one done ASAP (I'm sure the rest of
the team is ready to rock and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:41:21PM EST, Stephan Hermann wrote:
E.g. if we choose 20 or 21 UTC, there could be room to attend
everybody (it will be early in Australia, though).
When I know beforehand..the timeframe between 20 - 22 UTC during
On Tuesday 10 June 2008 18:50, Luke Yelavich wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 10:03:10PM EST, Luca Falavigna wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cody A.W. Somerville ha scritto:
As for a meeting, I'd love to get one done ASAP (I'm sure the rest of
the team is ready to
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tuesday 10 June 2008 18:50, Luke Yelavich wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 10:03:10PM EST, Luca Falavigna wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cody A.W. Somerville ha scritto:
As for a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:32:50PM EST, Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
How about June 16th? (June 17th for Luke)
Sounds good to me.
Luke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Moins,
On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:03:10 +0200
Luca Falavigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cody A.W. Somerville ha scritto:
As for a meeting, I'd love to get one done ASAP (I'm sure the rest
of the team is ready to rock and roll too). I'm unfamiliar
On Monday 09 June 2008 02:41, Stephan Hermann wrote:
Moins,
On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:03:10 +0200
Luca Falavigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cody A.W. Somerville ha scritto:
As for a meeting, I'd love to get one done ASAP (I'm sure the rest
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Luca Falavigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I have added Cody Somerville, Scott Kitterman, and Stephan Hermann
as new members of MOTU SRU. Please welcome them to the team.
Welcome aboard! Can we schedule a short meeting to discuss what we can
do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cody A.W. Somerville ha scritto:
As for a meeting, I'd love to get one done ASAP (I'm sure the rest of
the team is ready to rock and roll too). I'm unfamiliar with your guy's
schedule but mine is very flexible. Please feel free to pick a tentative
I wrote:
I've been advised that the above represents a statement by
MOTU-SRU asking for inclusion as an alternative to the requested poll
Given that this is different to how team members have been
chosen in the past, I'd like to ask that anyone who objects to this
solution reply
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emmet Hikory ha scritto:
I have deactvated the memberships of Brandon Holtsclaw and Jordan
Mantha. Much appreciation is due them both for their help with MOTU
SRU in the past, and they deserve all our best wishes with their
current activities
Emmet Hikory wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Emmet Hikory wrote:
I'd like to ask that anyone who objects to this
solution reply in the next couple days (48 hours or so).
As a general policy or just for this case?
Just in this case(1),
No objection then
although it may lend
Emmet Hikory wrote:
I'd like to ask that anyone who objects to this
solution reply in the next couple days (48 hours or so).
As a general policy or just for this case?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Emmet Hikory wrote:
I'd like to ask that anyone who objects to this
solution reply in the next couple days (48 hours or so).
As a general policy or just for this case?
Just in this case(1), although it may lend itself as possible
precedent as part of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cesare Tirabassi ha scritto:
| Can I propose to extend the numbers of members in the motu-sru team to 6?
| Unless somebody objects we can have a full team up and running again
in no
| time, with plenty of enthusiasts ready to process all our SRU
Luca Falavigna wrote:
Cesare Tirabassi ha scritto:
| Can I propose to extend the numbers of members in the motu-sru team to 6?
| Unless somebody objects we can have a full team up and running again
in no
| time, with plenty of enthusiasts ready to process all our SRU to
everybody's
Dear MC,
please set up polls for extending motu-sru/replacing retired members [1].
Daniel, maybe you'd also like to transfer team ownership to MC (see [2]).
Candidates:
Stephan Hermann [3]
Scott Kitterman [4]
Cody A.W. Somerville [5]
looks, like we need two members (follow-ups to [1
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Cesare Tirabassi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear MC,
please set up polls for extending motu-sru/replacing retired members [1].
Daniel, maybe you'd also like to transfer team ownership to MC (see [2]).
Candidates:
Stephan Hermann [3]
Scott Kitterman [4
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Cesare Tirabassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear MC,
please set up polls for extending motu-sru/replacing retired members [1].
Daniel, maybe you'd also like to transfer team ownership to MC (see [2]).
Candidates:
Stephan Hermann [3]
Scott Kitterman [4]
Cody A.W
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Chuck Short [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip
Hi,
I would just like to make a suggestion if you wish to expand the team
then it should cover different timezones since the motu-sru might not
always be available.
Why is that nessary? When is a member of the SRU
Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
Chuck Short wrote:
I would just like to make a suggestion if you wish to expand the team
then it should cover different timezones since the motu-sru might not
always be available.
Why is that nessary? When is a member of the SRU team ever needed
*immediately
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Cody A.W. Somerville
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Chuck Short [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip
Hi,
I would just like to make a suggestion if you wish to expand the team
then it should cover different timezones since the motu-sru
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 4:16 AM, Michael Bienia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 2008-06-01 04:44:55 +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
looks, like we need two members (follow-ups to [1]), but that might be
subject
to discussion.
As I had to go out and look after one ~motu-sru member to get my SRUs
On 2008-06-01 04:44:55 +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
looks, like we need two members (follow-ups to [1]), but that might be
subject
to discussion.
As I had to go out and look after one ~motu-sru member to get my SRUs
ACKed, I'd like to hear from the remaining ~motu-sru members how many
new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Potyra ha scritto:
I'd say, we extent the deadline until tomorrow (31.05.08), 20.00 UTC. If
there
should be more than two volunteers (it looks like we need to replace two
members right now), I'd call for a vote then. Otherwise, let's
Dear MC,
please set up polls for extending motu-sru/replacing retired members [1].
Daniel, maybe you'd also like to transfer team ownership to MC (see [2]).
Candidates:
Stephan Hermann [3]
Scott Kitterman [4]
Cody A.W. Somerville [5]
looks, like we need two members (follow-ups to [1
have much choices.
If you however still want a vote, or believe, that we should follow a
different procedure *for this particular case* please reply until Monday
evening. Otherwise I'd ask that Stephan gets added to motu-sru on Tuesday.
Cheers,
Stefan.
signature.asc
Description
so it's Friday now, and Stephan is the only candidate so far (thanks again for
volunteering, Stephan!).
Oh, I thought there would be more interest on this. Come on people!! :P
I'd step out but I don't think that I'm ready for it (I've only done
two SRUs until now) :(.
Regards,
--
On Fri, 30 May 2008 23:08:05 +0200 Siegfried-Angel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so it's Friday now, and Stephan is the only candidate so far (thanks
again for
volunteering, Stephan!).
Oh, I thought there would be more interest on this. Come on people!! :P
I'd step out but I don't think that I'm
Hi again,
thanks for more volunteers.
Siegfried: Having no big track of sru history doesn't imho warrant that you
couldn't be a member of motu-sru. Do you also volunteer?
So, how do we proceed now?
I'd say, we extent the deadline until tomorrow (31.05.08), 20.00 UTC. If there
should be more
I'd be interested in volunteering if more volunteers are required.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Stefan Potyra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again,
thanks for more volunteers.
Siegfried: Having no big track of sru history doesn't imho warrant that you
couldn't be a member of motu-sru. Do
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
What is the benefit of 2) ? Can't the MOTU team do the selection in the
voting?
If there's some people motu-sru would remove, I would hope for the MOTU
team to
remove them too
Hi,
I'd like to call for volunteers to supplement the motu-sru team (see [1]).
Requirements:
* have a good understanding of the SRU process
* being able to work together with current team members
* ability to read and judge patches
If you're up for it, please reply to this thread.
@motu-sru
Stefan Potyra wrote:
@motu-sru: Once we have a number of applicants, can you select whom you'd
like
to see in your team?
Shouldn't that be voted by the entire MOTU team? We need a clear process about
this... (/me goes and adds it to the motu-processes Gobby document)
Cheers,
Emilio
Well,
On Fri, 23 May 2008 15:20:05 +0200
Stefan Potyra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to call for volunteers to supplement the motu-sru team (see
[1]).
Requirements:
* have a good understanding of the SRU process
* being able to work together with current team members
* ability
Stefan Potyra wrote:
@motu-sru: Once we have a number of applicants, can you select whom
you'd like
to see in your team?
Shouldn't that be voted by the entire MOTU team? We need a clear process
about
this... (/me goes and adds it to the motu-processes Gobby document)
I agree. That's how
Stefan Potyra wrote:
How about the following:
1) applicants reply in this thread
2) motu-sru does a preselection
3) we'll vote on the result
What is the benefit of 2) ? Can't the MOTU team do the selection in the voting?
If there's some people motu-sru would remove, I would hope for the MOTU
Hi,
Am Freitag 23 Mai 2008 16:11:30 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
Stefan Potyra wrote:
@motu-sru: Once we have a number of applicants, can you select whom
you'd like
to see in your team?
Shouldn't that be voted by the entire MOTU team? We need a clear process
about
this... (/me goes
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
What is the benefit of 2) ? Can't the MOTU team do the selection in the
voting?
If there's some people motu-sru would remove, I would hope for the MOTU team
to
remove them too in the voting.
The large benefit of allowing the existing members of motu-sru
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
What is the benefit of 2) ? Can't the MOTU team do the selection in the
voting?
If there's some people motu-sru would remove, I would hope for the MOTU
team to
remove them too in the voting.
The large benefit of allowing the existing members of motu-sru
Hi,
Am Freitag 23 Mai 2008 18:53:25 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
What is the benefit of 2) ? Can't the MOTU team do the selection in the
voting?
If there's some people motu-sru would remove, I would hope for the MOTU
team to
remove them too in the voting
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Luca Falavigna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Potyra ha scritto:
| with the sad news, that Jordan needs to focus his work on his PhD
thesis (good
| luck, Jordan!), I'm curious if motu-sru could benefit from
Hi folks,
with the sad news, that Jordan needs to focus his work on his PhD thesis (good
luck, Jordan!), I'm curious if motu-sru could benefit from additional
member(s)?
motu-sru, what do you think?
Cheers,
Stefan.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 05:17:43PM CEST, Stefan Potyra wrote:
Hi folks,
with the sad news, that Jordan needs to focus his work on his PhD thesis
(good
luck, Jordan!), I'm curious if motu-sru could benefit from additional
member(s)?
motu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Potyra ha scritto:
| with the sad news, that Jordan needs to focus his work on his PhD
thesis (good
| luck, Jordan!), I'm curious if motu-sru could benefit from additional
| member(s)?
|
| motu-sru, what do you think?
Recently, motu-sru queue
main/restricted and
universe/multiverse bugs apart, we should adjust links accordingly using
the Component switches on the advanced bug pages
In particular, I've ran across https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127325 - where
I've forgotten to send an SRU-email to this list then, and while looking
On Saturday 29 December 2007 05:45:08 Luca Falavigna wrote:
Hello Daniel,
dAniel hAhler ha scritto:
Shouldn't then all existing verification-motu-needed tags[1] get
renamed to verification-needed (and the same for
verification-motu-done[2])?
There has not been any discussion on that,
/2007/12/15/%23ubuntu-meeting.txt
There's a good rationale behind this choice. We want to keep main and
universe procedures as close as possible, these are the deltas so far:
1) motu-sru is responsible to approve a SRU candidate for
universe/multiverse components (instead of ubuntu-sru)
2) SRU
Hello,
according to the latest changes in http://wiki.ubuntu.com/SRU the
verification-motu-needed tag is obsolete and only verification-needed should
get used.
Shouldn't then all existing verification-motu-needed tags[1] get renamed to
verification-needed (and the same for verification-motu
Hello Scott,
On Mo, 2007-12-10 at 12:45 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I would have preferred (and did expect) someone from the MC to write the list
and say something along the lines of:
Here are the people who've volunteered...
We'll be taking a decision on date X. Please let us know on
Hello everybody,
as decided in one of the last MOTU meetings, we re-introduced the
~motu-sru team. The MC voted the following people into the team:
* Brandon Holtsclaw
* Jordan Mantha
* Luke Yelavich
* Luca Falavigna
* John Dong
Thanks for stepping up and working
://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#head-663887d94f6e6b300ffc75ce0
8b102e83a861cdd
Please either follow up on this thread or let me know.
Any news on motu-sru?
In case there is some need for backup, I'd volunteer as well, but really only
as a backup member. But seeing from the responses so
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
