Wei Keting wrote:
terminal for gedit don't cd to right directory ,I try to fix it !
--- terminal.py2009-07-09 09:20:21.0 +0800
+++ terminal.py2009-07-09 09:41:29.0 +0800
@@ -263,7 +263,9 @@
if uri is not None and gedit.utils.uri_has_file_scheme(uri):
Emmet Hikory wrote:
I do think the Key Teams policy applies, so that interested
parties are nominated, and if not rejected within the review
timeframe, are accepted.
I'm happy with that, but then the wiki should be updated to cover that team, as
right now it says:
key MOTU teams
Brian Murray wrote:
I've recently been looking at bugs with patches and ran across
http://launchpad.net/bugs/333835 which seemed easy enough to incorporate
and a worthwhile fix for Jaunty. However, I ran into a problem trying
to get the existing patches in mc to apply and adding that
Martin Olsson wrote:
If you really want the new version anyway, you can always install it
manually or try to see if someone packaged it at getdeb or similar.
No. You can always request it to be backported (and even help with backports),
although...
Hopefully someone will package v13 before
Original Message
Subject: [ubuntu/jaunty] gnome-format 0.1.1-0ubuntu1 (New)
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 15:15:13 -
From: Ubuntu Installer arch...@ubuntu.com
Reply-To: Ubuntu Installer arch...@ubuntu.com
To: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@ubuntu.com, MOTU
universe-b
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@ubuntu.com writes:
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
Your concern is completely legitimate.
I'm with Scott here. There should have been a call for volunteers as
in the past.
Do you volunteer for this job? Please join #lp-liason in that case.
I
Hello,
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
Your concern is completely legitimate.
I'm with Scott here. There should have been a call for volunteers as in the
past.
However, it was short notice,
When did Reinhard step down?
and wgrant and myself decided that we
would try to represent the interest
Jonathan Marsden wrote:
Adam B wrote:
How can I track down the current maintainer of the Blender package for
intrepid?
This page (http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/blender) merely says
the maintainer is Ubuntu MOTU Developers.
apt-get source blender
and then read the
Paul van S wrote:
The package hamster-applet in universe is updated from version 2.24.1 to
2.24.3.
You can find the source at:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/hamster-applet/2.24/
Can you please update the package in the repos because I cannot compile from
source, I am new to linux.
Jose Luis Blanco wrote:
Dear MOTUs,
I wonder if it'd be possible to allow the newer version of the package
mrpt 0.6.5svn706-1 [1] to enter Jaunty from Debian. That would fix the
build errors [2] in the current Jaunty's version for big-endian
architectures.
Sure, we are not freezed yet, so
Hi all,
Siegfried-Angel wrote:
to don't waste time reviewing the packages of those people who we have
already lost and who may not come back again, but instead to focus on
I agree with this: we don't want unmaintained packages in Ubuntu. Most of the
packages have a maintainer in Debian (and
Luca Falavigna wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
I agree with this: we don't want unmaintained packages in Ubuntu. Most of the
packages have a maintainer in Debian (and there may or may not be people in
Ubuntu caring for them). But getting new packages directly into Ubuntu means
we
Hi all,
Luca Falavigna wrote:
as of today, motu-sru [1] needs more volunteers to reach five team
members. Current members are Cody Somerville, John Dong and myself, so
we should nominate at least two new members to be ready to process SRU
requests for {uni,multi}verse at the time Intrepid
Hi Sarah,
Sarah Hobbs wrote:
Good afternoon developers, on this fine and sunny afternoon!
Recently, my attention was pointed to bug #273015 [1], about a
metapackage being uninstallable. On closer inspection, this turned out
to be a merge request, actioned 9 days ago.
As the sponsor of the
Frederique W. Piccart wrote:
Dear,
Please update this plugin to the latest version. The most recent versions
have an issue fixed where you get spammed with a MSN Error: Friendly name
changes too rapidly when using it with the MSN protocol in Pidgin.
The latest version would be
Hi all,
Scott Kitterman wrote:
It has seemed to me for some time that making decisions about process and
policy changes at MOTU meetings based on votes of those present is not
serving us particularly well. The major problems with the current system, as
I see it are:
1. Not very many
Michael Casadevall wrote:
As no one has voiced any concerns aside form a slight ambiguity that
has been cleared up, I'm declaring that we have reached a consensus on
the key team policy, and now can declare it an official MOTU policy.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Teams/KeyTeamPolicy#preview
Michael Casadevall wrote:
The floor is open for the next 72 hours for comments and concerns
regarding the new policy. If there are none posted after this period
has passed, this policy will be considered official and accepted.
Is this based on any (Scott Kitterman's proposal?) policy? If so I
Hi!
I hope I'm not late to give my own feedback ;)
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I had an very interesting telephone conference yesterday with the
launchpad guys. They are currently considering what features launchpad
3.0 will have. They did send me a list of things they have on the
schedule and
Daniel Holbach wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm very pleased to announce that Devid Antonio Filoni just joined the
MOTU team. After months of hard work and good feedback from his peers,
we're glad he now is part of the team.
Give him a pat on the back a nice welcome to the team!
Congrats
Helge Stenström wrote:
Is this the right place for a bug report on the xmonad package? This
is the maintainer mail address according to Synaptic.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xmonad would be the right place.
Cheers,
Emilio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Hi,
Stefan Potyra wrote:
The following flavors have been agreed on to be handled by the following
delegates:
- Ubuntu Mobile: Oliver Gravert (ogra)
- Ubuntu MID: Loic Minier (lool)
Isn't Mobile and MID the same? Or did you meant Education instead of Mobile?
Cheers,
Emilio
Emmet Hikory wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Stefan Potyra wrote:
The following flavors have been agreed on to be handled by the following
delegates:
- Ubuntu Mobile: Oliver Gravert (ogra)
- Ubuntu MID: Loic Minier (lool)
Isn't Mobile and MID the same? Or did you meant Education
Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
Thanks for getting the ball rolling again. I've been doing some thinking
about this and so I'm going to jot down some ideas to share :)
Thanks a lot to you too for this! I like many of your comments and ideas. I
don't have the time right now to answer to this in
Hi folks,
Just a quick notice to let you know I'll be away until last week of August or
first week of September. I'll probably be able to read mail from time to time,
but not a lot.
See you!
Emilio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Stefan Potyra wrote:
Hence I'd like to propose that everyone works towards getting merges done,
regardless who did the last merge/upload.
+1 from me, although I won't be able to do many merges (if any) anytime soon.
Cheers,
Emilio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I didn't mean that there should be one wiki page per package. Only that
there should be one wiki page (or one section on the same wiki page) for
each class of change. In the case of libext-dev, there was probably at
least 20 packages affected by that change, where the
Emmet Hikory wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Emmet Hikory wrote:
I'd like to ask that anyone who objects to this
solution reply in the next couple days (48 hours or so).
As a general policy or just for this case?
Just in this case(1),
No objection then
although it may lend
Emmet Hikory wrote:
I'd like to ask that anyone who objects to this
solution reply in the next couple days (48 hours or so).
As a general policy or just for this case?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify
arthur clement wrote:
I submit my problem which probably comes from the package (I guess..)
Please report a bug at
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpdscribble/+filebug
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
First draft for a policy for motu-{sru,release} membership:
0/ The term of service for the motu-sru and motu-release teams is of one release
cycle (six months).
1/ When the nominating time starts, people may nominate themselves (with a mail
to ubuntu-motu@). There's no restriction as to how many
Stefan Potyra wrote:
@motu-sru: Once we have a number of applicants, can you select whom you'd
like
to see in your team?
Shouldn't that be voted by the entire MOTU team? We need a clear process about
this... (/me goes and adds it to the motu-processes Gobby document)
Cheers,
Emilio
Stefan Potyra wrote:
How about the following:
1) applicants reply in this thread
2) motu-sru does a preselection
3) we'll vote on the result
What is the benefit of 2) ? Can't the MOTU team do the selection in the voting?
If there's some people motu-sru would remove, I would hope for the MOTU
Hi,
Kai-Cheung Leung wrote:
mono is already 1.9.1, which is updated in Debian Lenny
http://packages.debian.org/source/lenny/mono
However in Ubuntu it is still only 1.2.6, but it seems to be lack of
people to update mono and the original maintainer seems to be busy.
what is the proper
Heiko Hermann wrote:
Hello,
Stellarium 0.9.1-2 from Hardy Heron only runs when setting LANG=C
before running. Could you please watch for an update?
Thanks for your work for the community,
Heiko
Works fine for me with 'LANG=es_ES.utf8 stellarium'. Please file a bug report
and
Scott Kitterman wrote:
My suggestion is to ask for a technical review from debian-python first.
Maybe they would be interested in having a copy on debian.org too.
That sounds like a good idea, I'll do that once I get the time to review it
myself.
Thanks
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Sebastian Marketsmueller wrote:
So my questions are:
- any good ideas on how we can best achieve that? (we could always just put
up a link on our download page: click here for ubuntu)
You could put a link as apt://flashplugin-nonfree. That will install the
package if it isn't installed yet
Charliej wrote:
1. If dash is implemented in lenny how will this affect future releases of
Ubuntu?
dash has been the default in Ubuntu for some time now, since 6.10
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh
2. Is checkbashisms-in-package.sh in the Ubuntu dev scripts?
There's
Gunnar Koppel wrote:
Terr!
Instead of NumPy documentation i found in this package only F2PY Users Guide
and Reference Manual. Where can i find NumPy documentation? Or did i
understand something wrong?
Package: python-numpy-doc
Description: Numpy documentation
Sorry, I don't think I
Gunnar Koppel wrote:
Ühel kenal päeval (kolmapäev, 30. aprill 2008) kirjutas Emilio Pozuelo
Monfort:
Sorry, I don't think I understand your question. This package indeed
contains NumPy's documentation.
Here is listing i got:
$ dpkg -L python-numpy-doc
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share
Sarah Hobbs wrote:
I don't see how binary
uploads, even when accompanied by sources, buy us anything at all.
At the very least they bring the possibility to run lintian against the binaries
on REVU, and IMHO that's just enough. That's one of the first things I do when
reviewing a package and it
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
* for NEW packages, there is obviously no LP entry yet.
Actually there is, just after the package hits NEW. And you can at that point
subscribe to bug mail, so this shouldn't be an issue.
Emilio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Ubuntu-motu
Stephan Hermann wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:08:10 +0200
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
* for NEW packages, there is obviously no LP entry yet.
Actually there is, just after the package hits NEW. And you can at
that point subscribe to bug mail, so
Stephan Hermann wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:52:45 +0200
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, should I see a package for which the packager says he won't
look at it anymore when it hits the archive because it's not his
duty, I won't upload it. With those arguments, it's
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 13:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
So I think mailing lintian's output to the uploader would be a good idea.
And ideally that would be against source and binaries, at least for the
first upload... although that would place a high load
Hi all,
Emmet Hikory wrote:
Ubuntu MOTU Meeting Minutes for Friday, 11th April 2008, 12:00 UTC
== Use, nomenclature, and requirements for the Universe Hackers
(Ubuntu Contributing Developers) team ==
[...]
For nomenclature, there were three names under discussion: the wiki
name as shown on
Hi,
Stefan Potyra wrote:
it's almost there, FinalFreeze will impact on April, 10th.
[...]
Finally, in the last 24 hours, every upload must get approved by motu-release,
or ubuntu-release to not drain out the buildds.
I didn't understand this... does it mean the freeze starts on April 9th, as
Daniel Holbach wrote:
Stani schrieb:
I don't have sufficient knowledge to host such a session, but pochu
volunteered to do it and added it to the wiki. I could help translating
this session to a wiki MOTU tutorial for which I think there is a high
demand.
Excellent! Thanks Stani and
Hi Stani,
Stani wrote:
I don't know if anyone here can help. A bug was reported against SPE of
which I am the upstream author. The bug was marked as a duplicate of
another bug which does not seem public and which I don't have the rights
to access. I'd like to work on this bug. How do I
Jens Porup wrote:
hello
as of today lbreakout2 segfaults, thus:
Seems to be bug 196334 [1].
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lbreakout2/+bug/196334
Cheers
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify
Hi Stefan, thanks a lot for sending the Minutes!
I just wanted to clarify a couple of things:
[AGREED] One u-u-s day to clear u-u-s queue.
It was agreed to have one day to clear the u-u-s queue, and some more days
before Hardy is released to fix some important things, such as FTBFS, NBS,
Hi Fahad,
Fahad Sadah escribió:
So I don't need to do anything to get myself officially listed or
something? There is nothing in those documents about it.
Read the first section of this page to see how to become an official Ubuntu
developer.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopers
Also,
Cesare Tirabassi escribió:
Everybody is free to contribute, the only requirement is to be an ubuntero.
I don't think we require (casual) contributors to sign the Code of Conduct, do
we? If so, I don't think that's a good idea...
Is that documented anywhere?
Cheers,
Emilio
--
Ubuntu-motu
Sarah Hobbs wrote:
I can't see the point in doing additional paperwork for bugfix-only
releases,
which will automatically get accepted either.
Totally agreed. I also raised my disagreement, but the explanation to this
policy was that this would mean that MOTUs (btw note that this also affects
Stephan Hermann wrote:
That's how I see it, too. If a new upstream fixes serious bugs, we
should bring it in...(not forgetting the paperwork and an ack from
motu-release)
I think you misread his proposal. There's no need for an ACK from motu-release
if the new release is bug-fix only. That's
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2008 15:43, Michael Bienia wrote:
On 2008-02-14 12:05:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Up through Alpha 6, if a MOTU believes upload of a new upstream release
that just has bug fixes in it is warranted, they may upload it. File a
bug in LP with
Michael Bienia wrote:
On 2008-02-14 22:11:29 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Another option I'm thinking which would be in the middle of having to do some
paperwork when it shouldn't be necessary and not thinking about it or not
checking it is to listen all the changes from upstream NEWS
Stephan Hermann wrote:
Hi,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Stephan Hermann wrote:
That's how I see it, too. If a new upstream fixes serious bugs, we
should bring it in...(not forgetting the paperwork and an ack from
motu-release)
I think you misread his proposal. There's no need for an ACK
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Hello there,
Since every mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is prefixed with those
prefixes, I thought we should remove them. They make the subject longer
without
providing anything useful, I most likely everyone is filtering those mails to
a
special folder
NEW: simdock_1.2.orig.tar.gz
NEW: simdock_1.2-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
NEW: simdock_1.2-0ubuntu1.dsc
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:24:41 -0500
Source: simdock
Binary: simdock
Architecture: source
Version: 1.2-0ubuntu1
Distribution: hardy
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Team
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 08:49, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 23.01.2008, 08:27 -0500 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
We also need to take up the renaming issue. I think motu-release works
as feature freeze is the first step for Universe in that process.
I'd
Mimmo Cecere Palazzo wrote:
Hello,
the version 1-12.1-ubuntu1 of the checkgmail package
can't connect to the gmail server due to a change
of the gmail service.
That sounds like https://launchpad.net/bugs/175973
It has a patch attached, so I've subscribed ~ubuntu-universe-sponsors.
Cheers,
Andrea Veri wrote:
Коржевин Дмитрий Константинович ha scritto:
Forwarded Message
From: Steven Sheehy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Romain Beauxis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Linuxdcpp package need update in 8.04 Hardy
Heron]
Date: Tue, 25
Emmet Hikory wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 6:26 PM, Christophe Sauthier wrote:
I know that this is MOTU-related... But if a simply MOTUHopeful
might help, you can count me in also...
While I am a big proponent of the one doesn't need upload rights
to help school of thought, I think that we'd
Hello all!
Emmet Hikory has volunteered for running a session about how to read stack
traces (thanks Emmet!).
(quoting from wikipedia):
A stack trace (also called stack backtrace or stack traceback) is a report of
the active stack frames instantiated by the execution of a program. They are
Emmet Hikory wrote:
Reviewers and Packagers,
At the recent MOTU Meeting, a set of guidelines for new package
review was reviewed. This list is meant to supplement reviewers base
opinions when reviewing packages, and provide for a relatively stable
set of criteria when packagers are
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
First of all, thanks for the fast response, clearly appreciated.
Sometimes I wish some of my upstreams would be as responsive as this
downstream. ;)
* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-23 19:12:49 CEST]:
At one point in the past, libsdl
Brandon Holtsclaw wrote:
Since it seems there has been a bit of confusion over just exactly what
needs to be done pre-upload to -proposed I suggest the folloing list
be added to the upload step of the wiki and become official policy so
there is no confusion about -proposed uploads. This list
at the changelog, you will
see:
- Added libsdl1.2-dev to Build-deps (fix FTBFS)
-- Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:10:08 +0100
That was in Feisty, and it's fixed now, so we can remove it. But why would you
remove it? You shouldn't rely on dependencies of your build
Hello folks.
This is a reminder for the next MOTU meeting, which will take place in
#ubuntu-meeting on Freenode this Friday, October 19th at 12:00 UTC.
Actually, the agenda is empty, so don't doubt to add your items!
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Meetings
Everybody is welcome to attend the
Hello everybody.
At today's meeting, it has been decided to schedule the next MOTU meeting on
October 19th at 12:00 UTC, unless anybody wants to propose a different time.
As usual, you can add your items to the agenda on
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Meetings
Thanks,
Emilio
--
Ubuntu-motu
These are the minutes for the MOTU Meeting held on #ubuntu-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
You can find the minutes on the wiki at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Meetings/2007-10-05
MOTU Meeting Minutes for Friday, October 5th, 2007, 20:00UTC.
== Mentoring Program ==
Cesare Tirabassi (norsetto)
Luke Yelavich wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:29:59PM EST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Luke Yelavich wrote:
Hey folks
At the MOTU meeting which has just completed, those of us who were present
were not able to come to a decision
about the next meeting time/date. We agreed that it should
Luke Yelavich wrote:
Hey folks
At the MOTU meeting which has just completed, those of us who were present
were not able to come to a decision
about the next meeting time/date. We agreed that it should be in two weeks
from now, but couldn't agree on an
exact time. Two times were suggested,
Reported, and fixed in Gutsy. A backport has been requested.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat5.5/+bug/97096
Cefn Hoile wrote:
But just in case, here's the summary.
Architecture: all
Version: 5.5.20-4ubuntu1
http://cefn.com/blog/ubuntutomcat.html
signature.asc
Benry wrote:
Hi,
this package:
Architecture: i386
Source: openmpi
Version: 1.1-2.3
Depends: openmpi-libs0 (= 1.1-2.3)
Conflicts: libopal-dev, pgapack
Filename: pool/universe/o/openmpi/openmpi-dev_1.1-2.3_i386.deb
has a little bug:
It store all the includes files in
Charlie wrote:
Hello MOTU's
Ok I'm confused, at what stage in the building process do you include
0ubunt1 into your package name?
You have to include it in debian/changelog, so the first line looks like
this:
liferea (1.2.17-0ubuntu1) gutsy; urgency=low
Cheers
Emilio
This is how I build
Charlie wrote:
Hello MOTU's
I have a package in REVU (ampache-3.3.3.2), what changes do I need to
make to ampache to submit it to Debian?
In debian/control, change the distro from gutsy to unstable, and the
release should be -1, instead of -0ubuntu1.
Then upload it to mentors.debian.net, or
Sam Morris wrote:
Hi there,
Hi Sam
I maintain the Debian package of pymsnt. I recently found the utnubu
service that displays the differences between Debian packages and their
counterparts in Ubuntu. I looked up pymsnt and saw that you're patching
the code like so:
diff -Nur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cesare Falco wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'd like to ask when the next cycle start is due, and
if a project name for 7.10 has been choosed already.
Thanks!
Cesare.
Hi Cesare
It's already started. It's name is Gutsy Gibon, and it will be released
80 matches
Mail list logo
