Re: This needs attention

nk that we as a community need to look at this issue and > >> I > >> am not talking about the bug itself (which needs to be fixed too) but the > >> issue of one person's opinion could cancel out (and thus enrage) other > >> people of the community with living an issue hanging in the air with no > >> apparent way of solving the different opinions in any way shape or form. > >> > >> It should not be that who has a higher authority that is right no matter > >> > >> how wrong she is. > >> > >> Is there anyone at canonical that can take a look at this? Seems a > >> correction of this particular programmer needed on dealing with community > >> raised bugs specially because she won't be able to work like this with > >> the > >> rest of the guys if she does not let them propose solutions and fixes but > >> trying to silence them. > >> > >> With Kind Regards, > >> > >> Gabor Toth > >> > >> Phone: +45-2163-4983 > >> Skype: gabor.me > >> > >> Copenhagen, Denmark > >> > >> > >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Scott Kitterman https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality

Re: This needs attention

-- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality

Re: This needs attention

You can't quit can you? Many developers, such as Phillip (and myself) are volunteers and are doing our best to help make Ubuntu better. Hostile behavior such as yours makes Ubuntu development a lot less enticing as a way to spend my free time. It's also highly correlated in my experience with

Re: Bug importances - Suggestion for improvement

On Wednesday, April 09, 2014 15:00:49 C de-Avillez wrote: > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella < > > es204904...@gmail.com> wrote: > > El 08/04/14 22:35, C de-Avillez escribió: > > Sorry, I do not understand what you said above. Can you please rephrase? > > > > Yes: Although

Re: 🐞 Ubuntu Bug Weekend will start this weekend

On Monday, March 03, 2014 16:08:24 Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > The 03/03/14 14:59, Elfy wrote: > > Will you please just use text. > > I normally respect compatibility across systems and technologies, as it > could be those which only features plain text emails (mainly because > using GNU Priva

Re: Google Hangouts

> >El 12/11/13 05:01, Scott Kitterman escribió: >> Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: >>> Yes, sometimes laws are like that: people cannot marry who they >want, >>> for example. Or people (specially young ones) are meant to be under >>> constant control.

Re: Google Hangouts

Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: >Yes, sometimes laws are like that: people cannot marry who they want, >for example. Or people (specially young ones) are meant to be under >constant control. Luckily this can be solved. > >And speaking about why I initialized this topic; the reason is I think >pro

Re: Mir instead of Xorg-server

> Istimsak Abdulbasir > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Currently there's no Mir suport for non-free video drivers, so anyone with > > nVidia/ATI will need to use Xorg. Additionally, some of the other flavors > > are > > sti

Re: Mir instead of Xorg-server

ed%3A+ubuntu-news+%28Ubuntu+News%29 > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Canonical have said they expect such support. I haven't seen any vendor > > announcements that they will provide them, so I think it's at least > > somewhat >

Re: Mir instead of Xorg-server

uot;there is no Mir support for non-free video drivers", > > are you referring to the drivers provided in the repos, or the proprietary > > drivers supplied by the manufacturers? > > > > Istimsak Abdulbasir > > > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Sco

Fwd: Jenkins Failure - saucy-adt-python-qt4 5

This is the first Jenkins failure mail I've gotten. I can't make sense of it. Was there even a test run? Why was the mail sent? Scott K -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Jenkins Failure - saucy-adt-python-qt4 5 Date: Sunday, June 30, 2013, 08:11:16 AM From: Jenkins Notificat

Re: Mir instead of Xorg-server

Currently there's no Mir suport for non-free video drivers, so anyone with nVidia/ATI will need to use Xorg. Additionally, some of the other flavors are sticking with X for 13.10, and X from 13.10 is needed for 12.04 hardware enablement updates, so it'll be maintained in any case. Scott K On

Re: Mir instead of Xorg-server

Istimsak Abdulbasir wrote: >Starting with 13.10, will the new xserver be Mir or will both Mir and >xorg-server be available for saucy? > >Istimsak abdulbasir > > > > >-- >Ubuntu-quality mailing list >Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubu

Re: PyQt4.Qtcore module error

On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 02:28:50 PM Istimsak Abdulbasir wrote: > I got this error when trying to file a bug against mesa on kubuntu 13.10. > > username@kubuntu13.10# ubuntu-bug > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/share/apport/apport-kde", line 20, in > from PyQt4.QtCore impo

Re: wiki page deletion

On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 01:45:32 PM Jackson Doak wrote: > is it OK for me to delete https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/ISO/SmokeTesting ? > it is a stub and all of it's info is on > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/ISO/Smoke You should put in redirects, not delete. Scott K -- Ubuntu-quality mail

Re: 12.04.1 to 13.04 Update Bug

On Monday, May 06, 2013 12:42:39 PM Brian Murray wrote: > On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 12:38:36PM -0700, Braden Wolfe wrote: > > Just a quick bump for today. > > I mainly do bug esting on AMD based laptops, and with the release of > > 13.04, > > I've been non top if the new release. I found a bug reguar

Re: Raring Cycle Feedback and vUDS blueprint planning

Siddhanathan Shanmugam wrote: >A little feedback for improving the testing experience. > >Apport currently doesn't allow for automated crash reporting on >unofficial >packages delivered through a PPA. Jason >DeRose has >a good article on a workar

Re: LubuntuQA Printer not detected bug#1133794

> > **Sent from my LG Escape™, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > ** > > > > -- Original message -- > > *From: *Scott Kitterman ** > > *Date: *4/29/2013 1:21 PM > > *To: *ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com; > > *Subject:*Re: LubuntuQA Printer not d

Re: LubuntuQA Printer not detected bug#1133794

On Monday, April 29, 2013 01:08:36 PM Warren Clemmons wrote: > Hello > > For all Lubuntu 13.04 users/testers who were having printer issues and > bug#1133794 relates to your problem please go mark that this bug affects > you in launchpad. This bug 1133794 is set to expire in five days. The > curre

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] [PPC] desktop

Thank you very much to the people who jumped in to test PowerPC for Kubuntu. Thanks to you we were able to release Kubuntu 13.04 for PowerPC (we missed it for 12.10 due to a lack of testers/lack of work arounds for issues that were found). Because you not only ran the test case, but kept at it

Re: [Lubuntu-qa] still needs testing

#x27; PPC wik FAQ area and simply put a link to it). > >Regards, > >Phill. > >On 25 April 2013 00:01, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> Great. I'm willing to release this is we get a report of a >successful >> install. Then the question will be how big is the

Re: still needs testing

;p=12610701#post12610701 > > > > 'Run ubiquity --debug and the installer will run fine' > > Regards, > > Phill. > > On 24 April 2013 23:04, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 05:53:51 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > On

Re: still needs testing

On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 05:53:51 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Thursday, April 25, 2013 07:45:27 AM Jackson Doak wrote: > > Can everyone with a PPC or ARM computer test server and Ubuntu now, they > > have nothing done. everyone else: just keep up with the rebuilds and &

Re: still needs testing

On Thursday, April 25, 2013 07:45:27 AM Jackson Doak wrote: > Can everyone with a PPC or ARM computer test server and Ubuntu now, they > have nothing done. everyone else: just keep up with the rebuilds and > someone test kubuntu active Kubuntu Active (along with the rest of Kubuntu) is currently b

Re: Chromium dev.

On Monday, April 15, 2013 10:11:05 PM Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi, > > whilst the ubuntu guys do ensure timely updates for chromium, there are > some of us who do not mind being on the bleeding edge. The dev version of > chromium has now been added to raring. Please understand that this is not > t

Re: [Lubuntu-wiki-docs] End Of Life..

I thought 12.04 had a non-PAE kernel and it was dropped in 12.10. I think it was just made non-default and not available in the installer in 12.04. Scott K On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 03:59:51 PM David Gumberg wrote: > For those of you who are wondering, the reason older machines can't run > 12.

Re: Intention to drop Wubi from 13.04 release

Robert Ian Hawdon wrote: >I'm dubious just by the fact that original message was sent on 1st >April. Bad day to announce something big imo ;-) > >On 06/04/13 00:56, Istimsak Abdulbasir wrote: >> Sorry to hear this. Lets hope someone shows a kind heart and pickup >> maintenance on this installer i

Re: Call for Testing: Smart Scopes

It's not going in raring at all. Scott K On Friday, March 29, 2013 04:38:12 PM Nicholas Skaggs wrote: > Thanks to everyone for testing this! As a result of the issues found, > the feature is not going to make it into raring by default. > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2013-M

Re: Upgrade tests are there own product

Istimsak Abdulbasir wrote: >Wouldn't a respin of the main image affect the upgrade image? I was >thinking the upgrade will have to account for the changes in the main >images. >On Mar 14, 2013 12:19 PM, "Stéphane Graber" >wrote: > >> On 03/14/2013 12:12 PM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: >> > Pas was as

Re: Upgrading 12.04 to 13.04

why you might want /home on a different partition, but they are mostly, IMO, obsolete. There is zero need to put /home in a separate partition for upgradeability. Scott K > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 05:50:12 PM Al

Re: Upgrading 12.04 to 13.04

On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 05:50:12 PM Ali Linx wrote: ... > 2- If you don't have /home partition, you will lose your settings, etc > (someone please correct me if I'm mistaken). ... You are mistaken. I have systems that have been upgraded to 12.04 from as far back as 7.10. There's really alm

Re: Upgrading 12.04 to 13.04

There's no supported way to upgrade directly from 12.04 to 13.04. You have to upgrade to 12.10 first. The way to do it from a terminal is: sudo do-release-upgrade upgrade to 12.10 sudo do-release-upgrade -d that will upgrade you to raring (what's to be 13.04). Scott k On Tuesday, March 12,

Re: Beta 1 Testing

ase a PPC image? I was > under the impression that lubuntu were going to herd PPC over to them. > > Regards, > > Phill. > > On 8 March 2013 23:17, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Friday, March 08, 2013 11:07:14 PM Phill Whiteside wrote: > > > Hi good people,

Re: Beta 1 Testing

On Friday, March 08, 2013 11:07:14 PM Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi good people, > > For those flavours that are using Beta testing, the ISO's for them will be > released on Monday (as usual, a couple of days late as they are supposed to > be released on the Friday). The testing of these Beta 1 ISO'

Re: No Alpha 1 for you (except if you want to play with Kubuntu)

On Monday, December 03, 2012 05:10:21 PM Ho Wan Chan wrote: > Hello to all! > > So, Canonical has decided to remove the Alpha and Beta 1 Milestones for > Ubuntu Desktop/Netboot/Nexus7 etc. > > However, community flavors can still decide to whether they want Alpha and > Beta milestones. Now it is