You can't quit can you? Many developers, such as Phillip (and myself) are volunteers and are doing our best to help make Ubuntu better. Hostile behavior such as yours makes Ubuntu development a lot less enticing as a way to spend my free time. It's also highly correlated in my experience with people who can be safely ignored.
Not only is it counter productive to your immediate goal of getting a bug looked at (I actually looked at the bug in question and gave up because it was too painful to read), but it compromises you ability more generally to be an effective member of the Ubuntu community. http://www.ubuntu.com/about/about-ubuntu/conduct is not just a set of empty platitudes. It's an essential set of guidance to making a global scale project such as Ubuntu work. Please review it and consider how to align your interactions in the Ubuntu community with it. I know this is not easy sometimes (I find it a challenge frequently) but both you and the project will be better off if you do. Scott K On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 02:34:46 Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: > Ok, > I'm calm and relaxed now. Thanks. > > Sorry for the offensive language. It's just a matter of replacing a word > or two in my email and the meaning remains intact, though. > > If you have a look at the recent discussion in the bug report and > especially the changes made by Phillip Susi, I think you will understand > the reasons why I (together with one or two more users) felt enraged. > > By the way, I had already got my broken system fixed (thanks to the > contribution of other affected users who took the time to report the > issue and describe the steps they took to revert the damage) and I now > know what to do the next time the bug strikes me; so, I could have just > looked away and forgotten about it. If I spent my time replying to the > bug report and writing to this list to draw the insane - whops, sorry > again - incorrect - behavior of a developer/triager to your attention, > it was in an effort to do my best to prevent other thousands of users > from falling victim of the same issue. > > Regards, > m. > > On 27/05/14 02:03, Thomas Ward wrote: > > If I may make a suggestion, can we all just calm down on this, > > > > Matteo, your posting to a list, going on the offensive against someone and > > apparently getting very annoyed at it. That much is evident by the > > overall tone of your messages. My suggestion is to calm down, and relax > > a little. > > > > This may be a bug, but getting angry over it or the actions of others on > > this mailing list isn't helping anyone. > > > > ------ > > Thomas > > LP:~teward > > > >> On May 26, 2014, at 18:22, Matteo Sisti Sette <matteosistise...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On 27/05/14 00:19, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: > >>> The most dangerous thing is not even the bug itself, but the fact that > >>> there is an idiot who keeps claiming that it shouldn't even be fixed, > >>> and changing the status of the bug report to anthing but "confirmed" > >>> ("invalid", then "opinion", now "won't fix"). > >> > >> Oh great, and now he has even locked the status so people cannot change > >> it back. > >> > >> That man should be revoked the permissions to manage bugs. > >> All the idiotic claims he has made have been proved wrong (just in case > >> it was not evident enough) > >> > >> -- > >> Ubuntu-quality mailing list > >> Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com > >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
