So.
Now the dust has settled a bit - are people actually wanting to try for
a time when more can attend - which is always going to be hard with
those pesky timezones - or not.
regards
On 28/07/16 18:20, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
[snip]
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubun
Martin Wimpress:
> I'm certainly interested in keeping the milestones because it has
> absolutely helped identify issues before the panic of final beta.
How has it helped?
All confirmed reports are tagged with releases names and shorted by
importance, so that will be even better for identifying
Hi,
Excuse the top posting, I've only got my phone with me.
The timing didn't work for me to attend the meeting. But I'm certainly
interested in keeping the milestones because it has absolutely helped
identify issues before the panic of final beta.
Regards, Martin.
On 29 Jul 2016 6:20 p.m., "Wa
On 29/07/16 18:50, Martin Wimpress wrote:
Hi,
... But I'm certainly interested in keeping the milestones because it
has absolutely helped identify issues before the panic of final beta.
Regards, Martin.
This is exactly why I can't see the point in loads of milestones.
Unless what you'r
As much as Lubuntu has consistently been involved in every milestone, I
think, honestly, less milestones is attractive. It will, as Nio said, cause
us to focus less on getting each milestone out and instead focus on testing
across a wider scope. At least, that would be the emphasis to my team.
On
Hi,
[continuing top posting]
I suggest a compromise with one alpha and one beta release before the
final release. But we should also remind each other to check the daily
iso files - at least check the basic functions (that the live session
and installer work)
Best regards
Nio
Den 2016-07-2
Do you think it necessary to have 3 milestones leading up to the final beta?
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Martin Wimpress wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Excuse the top posting, I've only got my phone with me.
>
> The timing didn't work for me to attend the meeting. But I'm certainly
> interested in keepi
Well, it didn't seem like anyone showed up and some folks complained about
the timing, while others said they'd rather not talk at all.
That being said, perhaps we should discuss this in the mailing list.
Is there anyone amongst flavors who would like to continue doing
milestones? If not, maybe w
Walter Lapchynski:
> We need to organize together, which we're not doing too well.
If you care about organization, my suggestion would be to put it written
on a wiki that anyone could see, without digging too much in minor
points. Make a draft of it and agree on the details later on.
This is
I would be happy to join the discussion, but anything before 18:00 UTC
today is impossible for me.
How about a doodle poll for sometime next week?
Philip
On 07/29/2016 09:22 AM, flocculant wrote:
Agree with the sentiment.
Not so sure about the need for a meeting less than 24hours after yo
Agree with the sentiment.
Not so sure about the need for a meeting less than 24hours after you
bumped the subject.
I know I'll likely not make it.
On 28/07/16 18:20, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
That being said, let's talk! I'd like to suggest we get together in
#ubuntu-meeting tomorrow F
This is well worth bringing up again, at least if we care about milestones.
It's clear that Ubuntu does not. In fact, some of the Release Team would
argue that we would be better off doing a wider scope of testing daily and
I don't disagree. Canonical will not be holding our hands on this one. We
n
12 matches
Mail list logo
