On Friday, July 11, 2014 16:07:54 Rohan Garg wrote:
> >> 6) We don't intend to provide upgrade mechanisms for this CD from 14.10
> >> to
> >> 15.04
> >
> > Does that mean you are deliberately *disabling* the stock upgrade support?
>
> Well, we're not explicitly disabling upgrades, a user can stil
>> Does this imply that you are planning to do post-release updates via the
>> ppa on top of utopic? Why would you want to do this rather than rolling
>> users forward directly to u+1?
>>
>
> Yes, Primarily because this would allows us to judge the quality of upstream
> releases, and provide valua
> Sorry if I wasn't clear earlier. I think there is no problem with you
> moving forward with such a tech preview image built from a ppa. My
Yay! :D
> objection is only to publishing it as a "release" under cdimage.ubuntu.com
> come 14.10, since it will not be built from supported packages.
>
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 08:40:53PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 10:49:17 Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > ...
> > >> Because you're building it from a ppa, so it's not a remix.
> > > ...
> > > Canonical has published "remixes" that included PPA packages, so there's
Hi again,
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:48:44AM +0200, Rohan Garg wrote:
> So ... Could we move forward with this?
Sorry if I wasn't clear earlier. I think there is no problem with you
moving forward with such a tech preview image built from a ppa. My
objection is only to publishing it as a "relea
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Rohan Garg wrote:
>> Is Framework 5 (et.al) going to be co-installable with KDE4?
>
> Yes.
>
>> If yes, why a separate PPA is needed, instead of uploading everything
>> into the archive? (even if daily / from git snapshot code)
>>
>
> Because frameworks are just the
> Is Framework 5 (et.al) going to be co-installable with KDE4?
Yes.
> If yes, why a separate PPA is needed, instead of uploading everything
> into the archive? (even if daily / from git snapshot code)
>
Because frameworks are just the libraries, the workspace bits are not meant to
be co-installa
On Thursday, July 03, 2014 08:26:33 Alan Pope wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 10:49:17 Steve Langasek wrote:
> > ...
> >
> >> Because you're building it from a ppa, so it's not a remix.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Canonical has published
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 03:23:44PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Is Framework 5 (et.al) going to be co-installable with KDE4?
> If yes, why a separate PPA is needed, instead of uploading everything
> into the archive? (even if daily / from git snapshot code)
No, Plasma 5 and related packages
On 3 July 2014 13:11, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, July 03, 2014 10:27:03 Jonathan Riddell wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:04:00AM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
>> > I was simply answering the point about remixes and PPAs.
>>
>> Calling it technical preview would be my preferred option.
>>
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 10:49:17 Steve Langasek wrote:
> ...
>> Because you're building it from a ppa, so it's not a remix.
> ...
>
> Canonical has published "remixes" that included PPA packages, so there's
> nothing novel about this. I
On Thursday, July 03, 2014 10:27:03 Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:04:00AM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> > I was simply answering the point about remixes and PPAs.
>
> Calling it technical preview would be my preferred option.
>
> Not being able to make a release is a bigger pro
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:04:00AM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> I was simply answering the point about remixes and PPAs.
Calling it technical preview would be my preferred option.
Not being able to make a release is a bigger problem, people need a
known working image that they can test on. It would
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 09:57:47AM +0100, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 09:38:00AM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> > The old trademark policy
> >
> >
> > https://web.archive.org/web/20130319043422/http://www.ubuntu.com/aboutus/trademarkpolicy
> >
> > included the text
> >
> >
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 09:38:00AM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> The old trademark policy
>
>
> https://web.archive.org/web/20130319043422/http://www.ubuntu.com/aboutus/trademarkpolicy
>
> included the text
>
> In general, a Remix can have applications from the Ubuntu archives and
> approved
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 10:49:17AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 07:09:14PM +0200, Rohan Garg wrote:
> > > Ok. So I think this seems generally reasonable, and in line with what the
> > > Kubuntu team has done in the past for preview images. I don't think we
> > > want
>
On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 10:49:17 Steve Langasek wrote:
...
> Because you're building it from a ppa, so it's not a remix.
...
Canonical has published "remixes" that included PPA packages, so there's
nothing novel about this. I can't seem to find the official definition of a
Remix
on Ubuntu.
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 07:09:14PM +0200, Rohan Garg wrote:
> > Ok. So I think this seems generally reasonable, and in line with what the
> > Kubuntu team has done in the past for preview images. I don't think we want
> > to have an official released 14.10 ISO that's built from a ppa, but we do
>
> Ok. So I think this seems generally reasonable, and in line with what the
> Kubuntu team has done in the past for preview images. I don't think we want
> to have an official released 14.10 ISO that's built from a ppa, but we do
> have the capabilities now to build images from ppa which we didn'
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 06:39:55PM +0200, Rohan Garg wrote:
> Hey
> > I had read your email, but didn't see any questions in it. What are you
> > looking for from the release team on this?
> Alright, I guess it's not clear enough in my email, sorry about that,
> but basically, the Kubuntu team w
Hey
> I had read your email, but didn't see any questions in it. What are you
> looking for from the release team on this?
Alright, I guess it's not clear enough in my email, sorry about that,
but basically, the Kubuntu team would like to ship an ISO with a PPA
enabled by default ( this PPA is e
Hi Rohan,
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 06:30:05PM +0200, Rohan Garg wrote:
> Bump?
I had read your email, but didn't see any questions in it. What are you
looking for from the release team on this?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Develop
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Rohan Garg wrote:
> ## Description
>
> Plasma 5 is an evolutionary release of the popular plasma desktop
> workspace. Plasma 5 runs on top of a fully hardware-accelerated
> graphics stack,
> using Qt 5, QML 2 and an OpenGL(-ES) scenegraph to deliver graphics
> ont
## Description
Plasma 5 is an evolutionary release of the popular plasma desktop
workspace. Plasma 5 runs on top of a fully hardware-accelerated
graphics stack,
using Qt 5, QML 2 and an OpenGL(-ES) scenegraph to deliver graphics
onto the users' screens. This allows the rendering to be faster, mor
24 matches
Mail list logo
