*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 729288 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729288
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 729288
package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
* You can
@gzarkadas, According to the Debian bug tracker, it seems that this has
been resolved since at least Karmic, perhaps Hardy. Is this still an
issue?
Reverting back to incomplete.
** Changed in: awstats (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because
This bug was fixed in the package eucalyptus - 2.0.1+bzr1256-0ubuntu2
---
eucalyptus (2.0.1+bzr1256-0ubuntu2) natty; urgency=low
[ Andres Rodriguez ]
* debian/control: Add missing Dep on python-boto for eucalyptus-common.
* Fix packaging to correctly install missing python
Hello,
The ip-addres 169.254.169.254 for metadata service is now found in the
ifconfig. I think this is done by some registrations in the cloud.
So, i think: you must register something (Walrus or Cluster) before
reboot, when eucalyptus-nc is installed on the same server.
Could someone confirm
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bacula
Bacula had just been installed (but not even used yet). The error
appeared on upgrading from 8.04 to 10.04.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: bacula-director-mysql 5.0.1-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729574
Title:
package bacula-director-mysql 5.0.1-1ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade:
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Relevant extract from log:
Setting up bacula-fd (5.0.1-1ubuntu1) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/bacula-fd ...
bin) in auto mode.
tr: write error: Broken pipe
tr: write error
cat: write error: Broken pipe
* Starting Bacula File daemon...
...fail!
invoke-rc.d: initscript
Hiello Clint,
thank you for responding and corrections.
I've just installed the packages using aptitude -
it happens on the (first) run of ntpdate, while starting services.
I've noticed there is some code trying to address this
problem, it seems logical at first sight
I do not see why it is not
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: squid
crashed standard update
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-27.49-generic-pae 2.6.32.26+drm33.12
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-27-generic-pae i686
Architecture: i386
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729687
Title:
package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: squid
failed during upgrade
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-28.55-generic-pae 2.6.32.27+drm33.12
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-28-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729694
Title:
package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: munin
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.10
Release:10.10
$ apt-cache policy munin
munin:
Installed: 1.4.5-1ubuntu2.1
After trying to reduce the number of processes running munin-update by
setting max_processes 2 in munin.conf munin
** Bug watch added: munin-monitoring.org/ #990
http://munin-monitoring.org/ticket/990
** Also affects: munin via
http://munin-monitoring.org/ticket/990
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: munin (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
You received this bug
** Changed in: munin (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: munin (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium = Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729709
Title:
Low
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: munin
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.10
Release:10.10
$ apt-cache policy munin
munin:
Installed: 1.4.5-1ubuntu2.1
After configuring munin to use cgi-graphing it failed with:
Use of uninitialized value $scale in substitution
(Sorry about overwriting your prio settings.)
** Changed in: munin (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low = Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729709
Title:
Low
I believe this is fixed in QEMU 0.14... referring to changelist (first
paragraph) on
http://wiki.qemu.org/Changelog/0.14#virtio
The references I gave above specifically referenced the authors applying
the 'bottom-half' fix, although they did not, as I recall, mention what
the fixed was against.
** Changed in: munin
Status: Unknown = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729709
Title:
Low max_processes leads to hosts being skipped
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
I used iperf -s on one instance and iperf -c xxx.xx.xx.xx on the client
image of two guest OS's running under UEC.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723983
Title:
** Branch linked: lp:~blueyed/munin/lp729709
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729709
Title:
Low max_processes leads to hosts being skipped
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bind9
1.
root@ns3:~# lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS
Release:10.04
2.
ot@ns3:~# apt-cache policy bind9
bind9:
Installed: 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.1
Candidate: 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.1
Version table:
***
bug still present in Maverick 10.10
this is the output with debug option enabled:
$ sudo -u news /usr/sbin/fetchnews
LDAP Config Summary
===
uri ldap://127.0.0.1/
ldap_version 3
sudoers_base ou=sudoers,dc=homelinux,dc=doma
binddn (anonymous)
bindpw
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: dovecot-postfix
dovecot-postfix sets up two subdirectories in /etc/dovecot/ called
'auth.d' and 'conf.d'. I understand the reasoning behind this is to
facilitate future upgrades using the package manager. However! The
delivery agent
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: squid
this occurs during standard system update
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-29.58-generic 2.6.32.28+drm33.13
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-29-generic i686
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729844
Title:
package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a
** Bug watch added: munin-monitoring.org/ #832
http://munin-monitoring.org/ticket/832
** Also affects: munin via
http://munin-monitoring.org/ticket/832
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #582786
** Branch linked: lp:~blueyed/munin/lp729709
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729719
Title:
munin-cgi-graph fails on multigraphs
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: munin
Status: Unknown = Fix Released
** Changed in: munin (Debian)
Status: Unknown = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729719
Title:
I'm using a wireless connection with wicd (wlan interface is wlan0). Adding
mkdir -p /var/run/samba does not solve the problem.
Changing
start on (local-filesystems and net-device-up IFACE!=lo)
to
start on (local-filesystems)
in /etc/init/nmbd.conf fixes it and nmbd starts. But this is not
Hi giox069,
That's a different issue than this bug (which is already fixed). Can you
please file a separate bug report about that?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064
Kylepablo, this bug was fixed in 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2, so a version
newer than what you are running.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064
Title:
nmbd fails to start
@Jelmer: ok, I will do further investigation on how wicd works and then
file a separate bug report.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064
Title:
nmbd fails to start
This bug was fixed in the package munin - 1.4.5-3ubuntu3
---
munin (1.4.5-3ubuntu3) natty; urgency=low
* Fix hosts being skipped because of low max_processes value.
- debian/patches/upstream_bug_990.patch (upstream fix)
- LP: #729709
* Fix munin-cgi-graph fails on
This bug was fixed in the package munin - 1.4.5-3ubuntu3
---
munin (1.4.5-3ubuntu3) natty; urgency=low
* Fix hosts being skipped because of low max_processes value.
- debian/patches/upstream_bug_990.patch (upstream fix)
- LP: #729709
* Fix munin-cgi-graph fails on
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: squid
package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status
1
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729911
Title:
package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned
I tried running natty guests and the results were actually slightly
slower. This makes sense as kvm is a host component and qemu is
affiliated with kvm. Presumably there is no guest component?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Yes, it's true, so i let this bug in this state, except if you think
that i should create another issue, or change the affected package ...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.
Forgot to mention in mu case I have the following flags
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext
fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good
nonstop_tsc extd_apicid amd_dcm pni
I have the same problem. I am using virt-install and I get the following
error:
root@ubuntu:~# virt-install --connect qemu:///system -n ubuntu-vm1 -r 2048
--vcpus=4 -f /root/vmimages/kvm1.qcow2 -s 12 --cpuset=4,5,6,7 -c
/root/vmimages/ubuntu-10.10-server-amd64.iso --os-type linux --network
From reading the VirtualBox site they had the same problem, that none of
the emulated sound cards would work with 64bit Windows 7/2008 as they
are all too old chipsets. They solved it by adding a new sound card to
Virtual Box ('Intel HD Audio'). But appears this remains a compatibility
'bug' for
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Debian)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697690
Title:
no dbg package for
Hi,
it may not be the right list for this question so please consider my
apologies for that.The reason I am posting here is I feel the people
on Ubuntu server list are quite knowledgeable and will be able to
answer my question.I have been trying to understand this from quite
some time
Simple. The hosting companies giving out root access have either many
dedicated machines, each with their own public ip or they use
virtualization.
No magic, nothing special. Hosting companies just have that many ips to give
out. For example, I rent rack space at a hosting company for my server,
So if some one has to host 100 million websites and if 10 million asks
then the web hosting company has these 10 million IP addresses?
If yes who gives them so many IP addresses?
I may sound stupid but I read that IPv4 have finished.A long long time
back (approx 10 years back) I had asked one of
On 03/05/2011 03:24 PM, Abhishek Dixit wrote:
So if some one has to host 100 million websites and if 10 million asks
then the web hosting company has these 10 million IP addresses?
Websites are different. Due to Name Virtualhosting you can host
multiple websites (thousands) on a single IP
The IP-adresses are bought from an organisation with a lot of IPs given to
them either by a RIR (Regional Internet Registries, eg. RIPE) or directly by
IANA. The whole thing with no more IP-addresses is that IANA no longer
have any IP-addresses they wish to allocate to the public Internet - there
48 matches
Mail list logo
