On 5/08/2012 7:11, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> Jim Tarvid wrote:
>
>> These two bugs are destroying my equanimity. I wrote a cron kludge to
>> work
>> around the first but I have to drive to the colo to restart my system.
>>
>> Needless to say I am not a happy Ubuntu Server user
>>
> Not everyon
On Wednesday 25 May 2011 00:23:22 zongo saiba wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have been running Ubuntu Server 11.04 for a couple of weeks with a Samba
> server and it is running great. The other day a client win7 tried to do a
> backup to the allocated Samba share and the server kernel-panicked on me.
>
On Thursday 31 March 2011 15:15:35 jurgen.depic...@let.be wrote:
Hi Alvin.
I read on your site that you stopped work on a project because LVM
snapshots potentially decreased IO performance, and I also saw that you
worked on a perl project to make copies of VMs, so therefore I address my
://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285013
[8] "_netdev not working"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384347
[9] "Libvirt NFS mount on boot."
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351307
[10] "quasselcore does not connect to database at boot"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612729
--
Alvin
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
ds me I still have to add this information to bug 712392 [1]...
done.
Links:
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712392
--
Alvin
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 19:39:57 Tapas Mishra wrote:
> I am having a virtualization setup via KVM on a Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit
> server.
>
> A recent dbus update cause a crash of my Host OS.It was a post install
> script of dbus which ultimately brought everything down.
>
> Now I have to basic
On Thursday 03 February 2011 15:01:37 Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Alvin (i...@alvin.be):
> > I have long standing performance problems on Lucid when handling large
> > files.
> >
> > I notice this on several servers, but here is a detailed example of a
> >
I have long standing performance problems on Lucid when handling large files.
I notice this on several servers, but here is a detailed example of a scenario
I encountered yesterday.
Server (stilgar) is a Quad-core with 8 GB ram. The server has 3 disks. 1 Disk
contains the operating system. The
On Wednesday 29 December 2010 13:27:19 Jussi Jaurola wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have loaded Ubuntu 10.04 LTS server on HP DL 360 G6.
> > Can someone please recommend good Hardware RAID Controller Card for this
> > specific HP Server.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Kaushal
>
> 3ware has several great perfo
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 10:45:58 Tapas Mishra wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > mount /dev/nintendo/lvm4 /mnt -o ro
> >
> > If it has a filesystem on it, that should detect it, and mount it
>
> I get following message when I do as above that you said.
> mount
-notifier/update-motd-updates-available contains the command
that produces this output (/usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check --human-
readable)
Any idea why this output appears twice?
--
Alvin
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo
Dustin Kirkland kindly requested me not to hijack his thread for this purpose,
so this is a new one. I hereby apologize.
I'm looking for people to confirm https://launchpad.net/bugs/563895
What you need is a system running Lucid on mdadm RAID1 with 1 LVM volume
group, spanning the entire md.
The
On Monday 26 April 2010 16:22:13 Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Imre Gergely wrote:
> > I've tried various things but couldn't reproduce the problem... See my
> > comments in the bugreport.
>
> Thanks, Imre.
>
> Please, anyone else looking at this, comment in the bug r
On Thursday 15 April 2010 10:57:24 Alvin wrote:
> A week ago, a server of mine suddenly started to halt on random moments.
> Blank screen, no input. Drives and memory where fine. I needed frequent
> reboots to be able to finally start the machine (always that blank screen)
> Nothing
A week ago, a server of mine suddenly started to halt on random moments. Blank
screen, no input. Drives and memory where fine. I needed frequent reboots to
be able to finally start the machine (always that blank screen)
Nothing in the logs hours before a sudden crash, nothing in /var/crash.
Afte
On Sunday 11 April 2010 12:16:55 James Gray wrote:
> On 11/04/2010, at 8:06 PM, Alvin wrote:
> > On Sunday 11 April 2010 11:59:58 James Gray wrote:
> >> On 11/04/2010, at 7:15 PM, Janåke Rönnblom wrote:
> >>> I have an IBM 3550 server where I have installed the 1
On Sunday 11 April 2010 11:59:58 James Gray wrote:
> On 11/04/2010, at 7:15 PM, Janåke Rönnblom wrote:
> > I have an IBM 3550 server where I have installed the 10.04 beta2 server
> > on. On reboot after the BIOS messages all I get is a blinking cursor and
> > then it disappears. If I try ALT+F1/F2,
On Friday 26 March 2010 19:15:09 Etienne Goyer wrote:
> 'Soren Hansen' wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 09:42:19AM +0100, Egbert Jan wrote:
> >> But what heck, nobody asked to have fancy server bootspash screens on
> >> servers.
> >
> > That's simply not true. /You/ may not have asked for it, bu
On Friday 12 February 2010 11:38:28 Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get this error mount.nfs: No such device inside the domU while
> trying to mount the nfs inside the VM
>
> "No such device" - NFS is not configured into the client's kernel.
>
> Is there a workaround for it?
I don't understa
On Wednesday 27 January 2010 20:17:00 Joe McDonagh wrote:
> Alvin wrote:
> > A lot of questions in the annual user survey concern cloud computing. I
> > administer some small businesses and use Ubuntu in most of them. Maybe my
> > biggest client will one day use a personal clo
On Wednesday 27 January 2010 23:15:37 Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Alvin wrote:
> ...
>
> > This is a real-life scenario. Is it common? I don't know. It's not free
> > of struggles as you can see. So, this is a plea for quality. Cl
On Thursday 28 January 2010 09:31:00 Etienne Goyer wrote:
> > Alvin wrote:
> >> Why not Ubuntu?
> >> - ZFS (does not need much explanation)
>
> Not looking to make excuse, but just so you know, ZFS on Linux is
> unlikely to happen due to licensing issue:
>
On Thursday 28 January 2010 11:58:31 Etienne Goyer wrote:
> Ante Karamatić wrote:
> > On 15.12.2009 13:40, Alvin wrote:
> >>- Helios, A commercial application to provide file and print sharing
> >>for
> >>
> >> Macintosh.
> >
>
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 18:12:39 Ante Karamatić wrote:
> On 05.01.2010 16:50, Alvin wrote:
> > So, the bugs I mentioned in my previous post would receive higher
> > priority. I only wonder whether this specific bug would be solved in
> > karmic, because it needs another
I'd like to upgrade a lot of machines under my care to karmic, because of
different reasons, but there is a bug that 'stops the show'.
retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470776
In short, NFS mounts can not be trusted. Sometimes
A lot of questions in the annual user survey concern cloud computing. I
administer some small businesses and use Ubuntu in most of them. Maybe my
biggest client will one day use a personal cloud, and I applaud the efforts,
but I can 't help but notice that other things are left in the cold.
The
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 14:17:12 Aljoša Mohorović wrote:
> i have no idea why kvm is not working, any ideas?
>
> # /etc/init.d/kvm restart
> * Loading kvm module kvm_intel FATAL: Error inserting kvm_intel
> (/lib/modules/2.6.31-15-generic-pae/kernel/arch/x86/kvm/kvm-intel.ko):
> Operation not
27 matches
Mail list logo
