Re: 12.04 server oddity

2013-05-08 Thread Ante Karamatić
Dana 08.05.2013 03:27, Phil Dobbin je napisao: > I installed Ubuntu 12.04 Server on its second drive successfully but > when it rebooted it told me that the Screen was out of range & the > refresh rate needed to be 60Hz & 1280 x 1040. I found this puzzling to > say the least that a headless server

Re: Help about openldap ssl

2011-06-17 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Pet, 17. 06. 2011., u 19:54 +0700, Aldyth Maharsha je napisao/la: > It is can handshake but peer's certificate not trusted, it is seem > like a "bug" or i must using certificate from ssl certificate > company?... You client doesn't trust you. Your client should either be aware of the certificat

Re: replace amavisd-new with mailscanner in main and in documentation

2010-08-02 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 01.08.2010 06:48, James Dinkel wrote: > Anyway, basically postfix now has the ability to write files to the > queue and then hold them there. Postfix has always written files to the queue. That's how it works. What it never supported is 'expecting others to read and write to its queue files'

Re: tips setting up DRBD and hearbeat to create high-availability virtual machines

2010-06-06 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 07.06.2010 00:27, scar wrote: > we have two identical, physical servers with identical hardware. i > wanted to set them up with several virtual machines (www, ftp, mail, > etc.) and then use DRBD and Heartbeat to make the VM's highly available. You can't use heartbeat as a cluster resource ma

Re: after installing ubuntu-server, HDD's are not detected in AHCI mode

2010-06-06 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 07.06.2010 00:42, scar wrote: > i am really leaning towards a bug with ubuntu. Well if the same setup works on other machines of the same type, except that one, I would suspect that there is a problem with hardware. My personal experience with Sun hardware is actually quite bad, so i I avoi

Re: some services don't bind to socket during boot

2010-05-25 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 21.05.2010 10:17, Leander Janssen wrote: > Another detail is that I'm using multiple ip addresses on the same > network interface. And that I'm using a bridge configuration to host > some kvm guests. I've attached a copy of my /etc/network/interfaces. I have a feeling this is related to upstar

Re: Mail Stack Name RFC

2010-05-17 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 17.05.2010 18:58, Scott Kitterman wrote: > If someone has access to an Exchange box I could test with, that would be > good to know. I have a working solution, tested and in production :) -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/

Re: Are pacmaker/corosync ready for production systems with Lucid Server?

2010-04-24 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 24.04.2010 19:24, carlopmart wrote: > Thanks Ante. But one question: packages released on PPA channel (in this case > pacemaker and rhcs) have long term support or do I need to use main and > universe repos? Only packages in distribution, marked with 'Supported' are long term supported (ex.

Re: Are pacmaker/corosync ready for production systems with Lucid Server?

2010-04-24 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 24.04.2010 18:45, Ante Karamatić wrote: >> Which cluster stack will be released with LTS support for Lucid server: >> pacemaker >> or redhat-cluster-suite?? > > RHCS is main, pacemaker is in universe. Just a side note. LTS means that all packages in main will

Re: Are pacmaker/corosync ready for production systems with Lucid Server?

2010-04-24 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 24.04.2010 13:20, carlopmart wrote: >Several weeks ago I have do it some tests with two kvm lucid guests using > corosync/pacemaker cluster stack. Some tests works ok and anothers not. Could you be more specific? Which tests didn't work? They all should work. >But due to inminent Luci

Re: RFC: remove dovecot-postfix from lucid

2010-04-19 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 19.04.2010 22:35, Scott Kitterman wrote: > That's a spec to try and take this integration simplification further. > Unfortunately neither Ivoks nor myself ended up with a lot of time to work on > it this cycle. More volunteers always welcome. Well, not everything is there, but: https://bugs

Re: remove dovecot-postfix from lucid

2010-04-18 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 16.04.2010 21:23, Scott Kitterman wrote: > It sounds like it does. If you can prepare an update and get it uploaded, I > can review it for the release team. I can't upload it (I'm not core dev), but I've created bzr branch: https://code.launchpad.net/~ivoks/dovecot/lucid Commits 66, 67 and

Re: remove dovecot-postfix from lucid

2010-04-16 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 16.04.2010 19:45, Douglas Stanley wrote: > Isn't that more or less what happens when dpkg configures postfix anyway? Am I > missing something that would make this task so difficult it's not worth doing? Unfortunately, it's not that easy. postfix's configuration can be edited with 'postconf' t

Re: RFC: remove dovecot-postfix from lucid

2010-04-16 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 16.04.2010 00:47, Mathias Gug wrote: > While the goal is worthwhile the implementation seems to not be the best > option. Using an alternate configuration file breaks a lot of common knowledge > to the point that an upstream developer filed a bug [1] with a patch to > dovecot > to provide addi

Re: SV: Upstart problems with cluster

2010-04-14 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 14.04.2010 14:20, Allan Jacobsen wrote: > With upstart you can not install mysql and disable that it starts, and then > it is very difficult to let corosync control it. Well, actually, you can. What's needed is new MySQL RA that would use upstart functions stop, start, status, restart instea

Re: kqemu and Ubuntu

2010-04-13 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 07.04.2010 21:43, Dustin Kirkland wrote: > As discussed at UDS-Lucid in November last year, upstream QEMU has > completely dropped support for kqemu, and consequently will not be > available in Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. The decision has been discussed at > length in several bug reports, mailing list p

Re: Lucid cluster stack with OCFS2

2010-03-27 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 27.03.2010 17:38, Frank Lahm wrote: > deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ha/ppa/ubuntu lucid main It's: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ha/lucid-cluster/ubuntu lucid main that was an error on the wiki. -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.c

Re: Dell Poweredge 1950

2010-02-18 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 18.02.2010 17:14, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: > Forgot to mention you, the CD Install having 8.04 image worked > perfectly fine. My PXE environment too have 8.04 Image. > So curious to know why it did not worked in pxe/net install whereas it > worked using CD install. Cause you are booting old kern

Re: Dell Poweredge 1950

2010-02-18 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 18.02.2010 13:58, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: > while installing ubuntu 8.04 server using pxe install i get "No root > file system is defined" on Dell Poweredge 1950 64 Bit Server Which kernel are you using for pxe install? The one from 8.04 or the one from 8.04.4? First one won't work cause it ca

Re: kernel drbd module

2010-02-17 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 17.02.2010 21:28, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > Comments? Do it. Note that drbd will become part of kernel upstream soon (post lucid). -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: [Ubuntu-ha] Call for testing: cluster solutions for Ubuntu 10.04

2010-02-13 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 10.02.2010 14:40, Ante Karamatić wrote: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ClusterStack/LucidTesting There was a bug in packages that prevented GFS2 filesystem to work. I've fixed that and I've renamed packages: pacemaker-gfs -> gfs2-pacemaker pacemaker-dlm -> libdlm3-pacemaker

Re: Call for testing: cluster solutions for Ubuntu 10.04

2010-02-10 Thread Ante Karamatić
Pacemaker in ubuntu-ha PPA for Lucid now support both OCFS2 and GFS2. Give it a try: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ClusterStack/LucidTesting -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTe

Re: RFC: redhat-cluster-suite demotion to universe

2010-02-07 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 07.02.2010 19:01, Mathias Gug wrote: > I had a discussion with Fabio, the upstream redhat-cluster-suite > maintainer, and it seems that the stack corosync+openais+pacemaker is > not feature equivalent with the current redhat-cluster-suite. Btw, pacemaker supports GFS2 and with RHCS 3.0.7 one c

Re: RFC: redhat-cluster-suite demotion to universe

2010-02-07 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 07.02.2010 20:52, Mathias Gug wrote: > If I understand correctly it's currently impossible to upgrade > automatically from cman/rgmanager to the new stack. Fabio told me that > there were plans to add support for the existing cman/rgman > configuration syntax to the new components (pacemaker) b

Re: RFC: redhat-cluster-suite demotion to universe

2010-02-07 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 07.02.2010 19:01, Mathias Gug wrote: > I had a discussion with Fabio, the upstream redhat-cluster-suite > maintainer, and it seems that the stack corosync+openais+pacemaker is > not feature equivalent with the current redhat-cluster-suite. Moreover > redhat-cluster-suite is currently updated to

Re: Call for help - Cluster Main Inclusion Reports

2010-02-07 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 02.02.2010 03:17, Ante Karamatić wrote: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ClusterStack/MIR There's a new test case with instructions on setting up for clustered file system - ocfs2. More info at: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ClusterStack/LucidTesting http://blog.init.hr/?p=146 Now we really

Re: RFC: redhat-cluster-suite demotion to universe

2010-02-03 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 04.01.2010 18:16, Mathias Gug wrote: > As part of the Server lucid seeds blueprint [1] I'd like to request your > feedback on whether redhat-cluster-suite should be demoted to universe. Do *NOT* demote it to universe. There are libraries (libdlm, libdlmcontrold) and maybe some binaries (gf2-t

Re: Mail Server

2010-02-03 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 03.02.2010 01:32, Mat wrote: > For various reasons I'm looking to upgrade/migrate to different server > with new software and I thought I would just stick with what has worked > for me in the past, until I ran accross www.mailscanner.info. This looks > to use the software we are talking about b

Call for help - Cluster Main Inclusion Reports

2010-02-01 Thread Ante Karamatić
Hi As some of you know, we've successfully finished testing corosync/pacemaker cluster stack. Next step is inclusion in Ubuntu main repositories. I've set up a wiki page where we can track filled MIR bugs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ClusterStack/MIR Please, help us get this job done as soon as p

Re: Mail Server

2010-02-01 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 01.02.2010 17:52, Michael Zoet wrote: > You can setup postfix + spamassassin + clamd WITHOUT amavisd. That makes > the life a lot more easier. In this way you must only configure > SpamAssassin and ClamAV by hand, but that is not as difficult as using > Amavis. Amavis is a painful package that

Re: Mail Server

2010-01-29 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 29.01.2010 19:18, Eric Peters wrote: > Anyway I'm in the process of migrating from Exchange as we speak, the > setup I'm using is ASSP > Postfix > Zarafa > And I agree about mailscanner, and amavis, spamassassin = pain in the > arse That's why I like ASSP all of those rolled > into one nice SMT

Re: Earth Computing

2010-01-28 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 28.01.2010 14:01, Alvin wrote: > - The product has been proven to be reliable > - Searches are a lot faster (last time I checked). Well, I must admit that netatalk is one of most reliable services I have ever seen on UNIX. To be honest, I find it strange that someone is using anything else.

Re: Earth Computing

2010-01-28 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 15.12.2009 13:40, Alvin wrote: >- Helios, A commercial application to provide file and print sharing for > Macintosh. Is there something wrong with netatalk? It's an open source application that provides file and print sharing. For OSX, AFP is deprecated anyway (and printing works much b

Re: Ubuntu Server update for Lucid Alpha3

2010-01-23 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 22.01.2010 16:51, Jos Boumans wrote: > * Integration of Amavisd-new, Spamassassin, and Clamav [18] There's a progress on this front. Source (amavisd-new) and packages (probably soon) are on my PPA: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ivoks/+archive/ppa Testing and comments are welcome! -- ubu

Re: Call for testing: cluster solutions for Ubuntu 10.04

2010-01-13 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 11.01.2010 16:50, Ante Karamatić wrote: > Now that those are packaged, we need help with testing. So, please, help > us test those components. Choose redhat-cluster or pacemaker as a > cluster stack. Combine with DRBD, KVM or Xen and try to break them. In a > day or two, I’ll s

Re: Question about CLVM

2010-01-12 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 12.01.2010 23:41, Mat wrote: > I've never actually had the opportunity to test this out yet so I may > dead wrong, but what you're trying to do sounds like it could be > accomplished with an LVM GFS and iSCSI stack. GFS being the shared disk > file system that can be access by multiple machines

Call for testing: cluster solutions for Ubuntu 10.04

2010-01-11 Thread Ante Karamatić
Hi all There was a discussion, at the last UDS, about cluster stack in Ubuntu 10.04 and later (https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server-lucid-cluster-stack). According to that spec, I’ve created packages for cluster-glue, cluster-agents, heartbeat, corosync, openais, pacemake

Re: Commercial support for fixing bugs

2010-01-07 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 07.01.2010 13:47, Alvin wrote: > I don't care for booting under 10 seconds on a server, but I do care for > consistent booting. Right now, there are so many things going wrong that I > don't know where to begin reporting. Even error messages are wrong (504224), > and without boot logging (32888

Re: Commercial support for fixing bugs

2010-01-05 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 05.01.2010 16:50, Alvin wrote: > So, the bugs I mentioned in my previous post would receive higher priority. I > only wonder whether this specific bug would be solved in karmic, because it > needs another solution than the one that will be used for lucid. After all, is > is already fixed. I,

Re: Server Team 20091209 meeting minutes

2009-12-09 Thread Ante Karamatić
Thierry Carrez wrote: > Next meeting will be on Wednesday, December 16th at 14:00 UTC in > #ubuntu-meeting. Sorry for not attending, but this meeting time doesn't work for me most of the time :( -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listi

Re: monitoring software with api/service to pull data

2009-11-30 Thread Ante Karamatić
Elijah Wright wrote: > Last time I looked at it, it was a massive tangly mess of bundled python > dependencies, and needed serious help on the packaging side. ;) Last time I looked at it, it didn't had copyright in source and it was creating unprivileged user with full root privileges (by sudo

Re: NetWork interface trouble...

2009-11-20 Thread Ante Karamatić
Gilberto Nunes wrote: > Somebody has the same situation??? On T300, one ethernet can be used for remote management. Check if that is the case. On my T300, one card is for OS and the other for remote management (it even has a wrench key next to the ethernet port). -- ubuntu-server mailing list

Re: 3w-9xxx: scsi0: ERROR

2009-11-20 Thread Ante Karamatić
Ante Karamatić wrote: > Ignore those errors. Those errors happen when you run smartctl on or old tw_cli or old 3dm. -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubu

Re: 3w-9xxx: scsi0: ERROR

2009-11-20 Thread Ante Karamatić
Kaushal Shriyan wrote: > I did that too already. The issue is that the server is very much > unstable and it freezes. Ignore those errors. Those errors happen when you run smartctl on /dev/sdX, instead on /dev/tw[e|a]X. If server is unstable, check your memory; it's the most common source of r

Re: DRBD inside DRBD

2009-11-10 Thread Ante Karamatić
Gilberto Nunes wrote: > The RHCS have a monitoring host system like heartbeat, and can > enable/disable services/IP's??? Of course. -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: DRBD inside DRBD

2009-11-10 Thread Ante Karamatić
Gilberto Nunes wrote: > I was afraid to work with pacemaker/corosync. Pacemaker/corosync is still a moving target. I've tested it with DRBD and it does work. There is no documentation in Ubuntu server guide about it since I don't want people to just use it, thinking it's a fully tested solutio

Re: DRBD inside DRBD

2009-11-10 Thread Ante Karamatić
Gilberto Nunes wrote: > I need use heartbeat to monitoring this VM too. It should work. The only problem I see here is heartbeat. If you are going to use Ubuntu 9.10, heartbeat is from 3.x series, which isn't something we all know as heartbeat. In that case you should use redhat cluster suite

Re: Hardware RAID

2009-10-09 Thread Ante Karamatić
Kaushal Shriyan wrote: > is there a way to know what type of Hardware RAID has been configured > on the running ubuntu 8.04 server Depends on your RAID controller. 3ware has tw_cli utility. IIRC, LSI has megamgr. -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu

Re: Demise of libvolume-id1 and redhat-cluster

2009-08-31 Thread Ante Karamatić
Scott Kitterman wrote: > At this point, redhat-cluster either needs to be ported/fixed or > removed. If anyone wants to keep it, I suggest they get to work. There's new RHCS (https://edge.launchpad.net/~ivoks/+archive/ppa) for which I'll request FFE during this week. All needed parts for new

Re: Upcoming Ubuntu Server Meeting - Tuesday, 4th of August - 15:00 UTC - #ubuntu-meeting

2009-08-04 Thread Ante Karamatić
Mathias Gug wrote: > As usual, anyone interested in the development of Ubuntu Server is > welcome to attend. As I most probably won't be able to attend, I'll give you an overview of current status of cluster stack. Fully functional pacemaker cluster stack is ready and, by the end of the week, I'

Announcing availability of stable DRBD PPA

2009-07-04 Thread Ante Karamatić
Hello Ubuntu High Availability team would like to present Personal Package Archive with latest stable releases of DRBD. This PPA will contain latest stable DRBD version for all supported Ubuntu releases. Packages for Ubuntu 6.06.* are also made, but for using them you'll need DKMS, which isn't av

Re: Call-for-Testing: KVM-84 Backport

2009-06-25 Thread Ante Karamatić
Tim Gardner wrote: > You know that I'm pretty close to uploading a 9.04 server kernel to > Hardy proposed, don't you? > > https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/kernel-karmic-new-kernel-on-lts Uh... That will require backporting some userspace tools (drbd says hello again :) from 9.0

Re: Server Team 20090623 meeting minutes

2009-06-25 Thread Ante Karamatić
Lionel Porcheron wrote: > Wil this turned into a DKMS only package or more like KVM, modules will > be present in the kernel shipped and the DKMS is more there to help > backport? It will be dkms only. -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman

Re: libvirt/kvm networking

2009-06-19 Thread Ante Karamatić
Aljosa Mohorovic wrote: > file attached are my current settings, guest machine has no connectivity. > my guess is that /etc/libvirt/qemu/networks/default.xml is wrong but i > have no idea if i should use br0 or virbr0 or something else. Let's see... ifconfig is OK my_hostname.xml is OK (you c

Re: Apropos bonding & ifenslave

2009-06-19 Thread Ante Karamatić
Carlos A. Carnero Delgado wrote: > In the previous LTS release (8.04) ifenslave was not a part of the > base system, that is, not available from the installation CD. I'm only > installing LTS servers, so I don't know if this has changed recently. > Since I have to use bonding in the datacenter we

Re: libvirt/kvm networking

2009-06-17 Thread Ante Karamatić
Aljosa Mohorovic wrote: > - /etc/libvirt/qemu/networks/default.xml # default network config for libvirt > - /etc/libvirt/qemu/ubuntu.xml # config for image created using vmbuilder > so i could check what i'm doing wrong. > > any help/comments appreciated. Once you have configured bridge networki

Status of DRBD

2009-06-16 Thread Ante Karamatić
Hello After discussing this topic during ubuntu-server team meeting, I've decided to sent an email to all related parties with questions and proposal of next steps. >From packaging point of view, DRBD consists of two parts; kernel part and userspace tools. Userspace tools heavily depend on kernel

Re: ubuntu jaunty server - locale problem

2009-05-27 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Sri, 27. 05. 2009., u 18:12 +0200, Aljosa Mohorovic je napisao/la: > when i try to install croatian support "apt-get install > language-support-hr" it installs non-server stuff (like some > openoffice packages). > that's not necessary for server edition, are there any plans to split > language-s

Re: E-mail server article mention

2009-04-28 Thread Ante Karamatić
Steve thanks for the link! U Uto, 28. 04. 2009., u 10:12 +0100, Steve George je napisao/la: > He complains a bit about the documentation and would like it to be even > easier, but recognises it's going in the right direction. Oh, it's far from perfect and even further from complete :) Jason woul

Re: Ethernet alias down at boot

2009-04-24 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Pet, 24. 04. 2009., u 09:55 -0500, James Dinkel je napisao/la: > What do you mean remove gateway? Isn't that where gateway is supposed > to go? Notice that he already has gateway for that network defined in eth0. -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubu

Re: Ethernet alias down at boot

2009-04-24 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Pet, 24. 04. 2009., u 09:15 +1100, Laurent Dinclaux je napisao/la: > auto eth0:0 > iface eth0:0 inet static > name ns2.geckahost.com > address 202.x.x.25 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > network 202.x.x.0 > broadcast 202.x.x.255 > gateway 202.x.x.254 > > After each boot I need to d

Re: Server Team 20090421 meeting minutes

2009-04-22 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Sri, 22. 04. 2009., u 10:20 +0200, Thierry Carrez je napisao/la: > ivoks had to review status of bug 360689. ivoks was not around for the > meeting but since the bug is now in "Fix Released" state the action is > assumed to be completed. Sorry about that. Right, Scott asked me for an advice and

Re: Your Distro is Insecure: Ubuntu

2009-04-14 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Uto, 14. 04. 2009., u 13:11 -0600, Alberto Sierra je napisao/la: > I think i know the difference between /bin/sh and /bin/false, but i > still don't know why irc (and some others) have interactive shells... > are they needed? what for? It helps with debugging. For example, slapd is runing unde

Re: Your Distro is Insecure: Ubuntu

2009-04-14 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Uto, 14. 04. 2009., u 12:35 -0600, Alberto Sierra je napisao/la: > Bottom line is, the article may not be good, but it is a great tool as > feedback for the server team, and constructive critisism is needed to > improve overall. Except the default home directory permissions, nothing else in tha

Re: Your Distro is Insecure: Ubuntu

2009-04-14 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Uto, 14. 04. 2009., u 09:23 -0700, Kees Cook je napisao/la: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 06:09:39PM +0200, Ante Karamati?? wrote: > > Next are users with /bin/bash. If those users would have /bin/false, > > they won't be able to run jobs from cron. > > The idea that setting a shell makes a service

Re: Your Distro is Insecure: Ubuntu

2009-04-14 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Uto, 14. 04. 2009., u 10:30 -0500, n2...@verizon.net je napisao/la: > The second page is reachable now. 'Ironically the first two entries: the Post Office Protocol version 3 (pop3) and the Internet Message Access Protocol version 2 (imap2) are installed and running despite Ubuntu having install

Re: Your Distro is Insecure: Ubuntu

2009-04-14 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Uto, 14. 04. 2009., u 08:24 -0600, Alberto Sierra je napisao/la: > what do you guys think? As for first page, there are use cases for DIR_MODE 0755 and 0700. Whatever you choose, you will never ever choose good default for everyone - that's just not possible. Since we choose to be Linux for hum

Re: Milter or amavis?

2009-04-09 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Pet, 10. 04. 2009., u 17:37 +1100, Laurent Dinclaux je napisao/la: > So what are the advantages of using amavisd-new over spamass-milter > and clamav-milter ? I'm not sure what are the possibilities of milters, but amavis has these great features (among others): - per user configuration - LDAP

Re: Spamassassin & amavisd-new

2009-04-08 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Čet, 09. 04. 2009., u 15:11 +1100, Laurent Dinclaux je napisao/la: > Apr 9 13:38:27 geckahost amavis[5410]: _WARN: config: cannot open > "/etc/spamassassin/local.cf": 13 Start exploring the problem with this warning. Why can't it open that file? -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@l

Re: Postfix network adapter

2009-04-05 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Pon, 06. 04. 2009., u 12:46 +0800, Onno Benschop je napisao/la: > I have two network adapters, eth0 and eth1. For no particular reason > that I've been able to determine, postfix appears to use a random > interface. This means that if it chooses eth0, mail does not go out > until I detect that t

Re: company exchange server & exim best practices.

2009-04-03 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Pet, 03. 04. 2009., u 09:40 +0200, Rudi Ahlers je napisao/la: > So, I would like to know, is there a way to "push" (not forward) mail > from the Linux server, after it has arrived and spam been blocked, to > another domain, but with the same email address? i.e. the domain in > question is attorn

Re: Server Team 20090303 meeting minutes

2009-03-04 Thread Ante Karamatić
I'm replying on mailing list, since others might have the same questions. U Sri, 04. 03. 2009., u 22:11 +0200, Imre Gergely je napisao/la: > But why is that link point to dovecot source package, wouldn't be better > to have it separated, like postfix-dovecot, so it's not really postfix, > nor d

Re: Server Team 20090303 meeting minutes

2009-03-04 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Sri, 04. 03. 2009., u 10:59 +0200, Imre Gergely je napisao/la: > Feedback on what exactly? Where can one read up on this? I'll blog about it today, so there'll be more info later. Take care -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinf

Re: trouble updating 7.04 -> 7.10

2009-03-01 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Ned, 01. 03. 2009., u 12:30 -0500, Jim Tarvid je napisao/la: > What is wrong with updating sources.list and simnply doing apt-get > dist-upgrade? do-release-manager handles some issues which can't be handled trough packages. For example, /etc/fstab isn't a part of any package, so (iirc) device

Re: trouble updating 7.04 -> 7.10

2009-03-01 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Ned, 01. 03. 2009., u 02:36 +0100, Sebastien Estienne je napisao/la: > why not just patching the python code of do-release-upgrade to > skip/modify the part of the code that is wrong? If locales would support locale named 'old-releases.', then exporting LANG="old-releases." and running do-relea

Re: trouble updating 7.04 -> 7.10

2009-03-01 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Ned, 01. 03. 2009., u 10:41 -0500, sean darcy je napisao/la: > Well it seems more complicated than that. See: That description there is wrong. I'll contact someone to fix it. The 'cookbook' I described works, it's not a random guess. It's a conclusion on basis of a code review of update-manager

Re: trouble updating 7.04 -> 7.10

2009-03-01 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Ned, 01. 03. 2009., u 09:41 +0100, Ante Karamatić je napisao/la: > 6. follow the instructions on the screen Oh, lol: 1. rm -rf /tmp/tmp* 2. run do-release-upgrade (it will fail) 3. rm /etc/apt/sources.list.d/prerequists-sources.list 4. cd /tmp/tmp(some random string) 5. edit prerequi

Re: trouble updating 7.04 -> 7.10

2009-03-01 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Sub, 28. 02. 2009., u 14:46 -0500, sean darcy je napisao/la: > Thanks. In the mean time I've think I've narrowed it down. So, the workaround would be: 1. rm -rf /tmp/tmp* 2. run do-release-upgrade (it will fail) 3. rm /etc/apt/sources.list.d/prerequists-sources.list 4. cd /tmp/(some random str

Re: trouble updating 7.04 -> 7.10

2009-02-28 Thread Ante Karamatić
U Sub, 28. 02. 2009., u 13:03 -0500, sean darcy je napisao/la: > I don't understand why it tries to use //us.archive.ubuntu.com. I've just installed feisty in my virtual system, and I'll be able to check upgrade problems in couple of hours. So, get back later for information. -- ubuntu-server

Re: Ubuntu 8.04 problems with some DELL servers

2008-04-23 Thread Ante Karamatić
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:38:15 -0700 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there an appropriate pointer to a source for the vendor firmware > that we could include here? Dell has firmware download for individual types of servers, so there's no general link for specific firmware, at least

Re: IT setup using Ubuntu-server

2008-04-20 Thread Ante Karamatić
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:09:14 +0300 "Jad madi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1-) central authorization layer for Internet access, File sharing Radius (freeradius) with LDAP backend (slapd). I would go with LDAP as a backend just because of the file sharing. > 2-) Users and groups to restrict acces

Re: Server Team 20080312 meeting minutes

2008-03-13 Thread Ante Karamatić
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:41:26 -0400 Mathias Gug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ACTION: ivoks to post an updated debdiff for bacula Done. I've sent it this morning (UTC morning) to zul. Anybody can check it out at: http://www.grad.hr/~ivoks/bacula.diff WARNING: I'm not responsible for mental health

Rewritten make_catalog_backup

2008-02-08 Thread Ante Karamatić
This is proof of concept and written only for mysql (adding postgre and sqlite is trivial). It should fix that nasty bacula bug. And yes, written in python :) Suggestions are welcome. make_catalog_backup Description: Binary data -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https

Re: Dovecot and Postfix integration

2008-01-18 Thread Ante Karamatić
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:41:52 +0100 Soren Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not sure about switching to Maildir. I definitely think Maildir > is a major improvement over mbox, but I'm worried too many things > still depend on /var/spool/mail/$USERNAME to be where the user's mail > is at. I co

Dovecot and Postfix integration

2008-01-12 Thread Ante Karamatić
Hi! As some of you know, I've been working on better out-of-the-box dovecot and postfix integration in Ubuntu. Status of the work is at: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/164837 We kind of all agreed on having this integrated trough task in tasksel. Last debdiff provid

Re: New meeting time proposal - Wednesday 21:00 UTC

2008-01-11 Thread Ante Karamatić
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:37:15 -0500 Mathias Gug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Every Wednesday at 21:00 UTC. > > What do you think about it ? Much better than last one, which was during working hours. This is 10PM for me and it is reasonable. I might even attend every time now :) -- ubuntu-server

Re: Server Team 2007-11-20 meeting minutes

2007-11-26 Thread Ante Karamatić
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:00:14 -0500 Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that's reasonable for now, but we ought to get Plain and > Login in there before Hardy's release. I think this option is a > great one for people who aren't experienced Postfix admins and so > it's be a bit of

Re: Server Team 2007-11-20 meeting minutes

2007-11-24 Thread Ante Karamatić
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:52:11 -0500 Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we need to either provide no plain text mechanisms or provide > TLS. Since the default setting for smtp_sasl_security_options > (noplaintext, noanonymous) will not allow plain text mechanisms > without TLS, the

Re: Server Team 2007-11-20 meeting minutes

2007-11-24 Thread Ante Karamatić
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:43:08 -0500 Mathias Gug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ivoks gave an update about integrating postfix and dovecot: to goal is > to replace saslauthd with dovecot. This means adding 1 or 2 lines to > postfix configuration when dovecot is installed. There was some > discussion a

Re: Server issues

2007-11-22 Thread Ante Karamatić
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:11:01 -0500 Jonathan Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ubuntu Server. In fact the server team has a lot of cool things on > its plate. In fact as far as I can tell jeOS or however it is Yeah, much cooler than JeOS :D -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubu

Re: Fwd: Re: Server issues

2007-11-20 Thread Ante Karamatić
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:15:20 -0700 Neal McBurnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't really have a well informed opinion on the topic of zeroconf > and/or LLMNR, despite having paid some attention to it. It's very simple. Both technologies claim one undefined domain. And this discussion went in

Re: Server issues

2007-11-20 Thread Ante Karamatić
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:05:23 +0100 "Sebastien Estienne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could you be more specific about the issue you had? You said it your self. It doesn't work if you use .local domain. You have zeroconf/avahi claiming .local domain and DNS server also claiming .local. And, since

Re: Server issues

2007-11-20 Thread Ante Karamatić
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:15:59 +0100 "Sebastien Estienne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/default/avahi-daemon > # 0 = don't start, 1 = start > AVAHI_DAEMON_START=1 But, that's not enough. Avahi (and everything done to make it usable) breaks some stuff on computers on whi

Re: currently problems with german mirror server

2007-11-01 Thread Ante Karamatić
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:15:22 +0100 Thilo Six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > as it seems 141.76.2.3 works normal 141.30.3.82 isn´t reachable via > apt. Ping does work sucessful on both. I don't know if German archive is part of Geant network, but Geant had some problems yesterday - broken optic link

Re: Ubuntu Server 7.10 Beta is looking for testers

2007-09-29 Thread Ante Karamatić
Mathias Gug wrote: > But still we need your help to get all these brand new components > tested. If you have access to some server type hardware or have the > opportunity to duplicate a production environment into a test > configuration, we'd love to hear if the next version of Ubuntu Server > wou

Re: Ubuntu Server 7.10 Beta is looking for testers

2007-09-29 Thread Ante Karamatić
Mathias Gug wrote: > Could you file a bug report in launchpad.net about it ? Sure. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/146648 -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.c

Re: Upgrade but already running?

2007-06-13 Thread Ante Karamatić
Michael Hipp wrote: > Are my eyes deceiving me or does this say it's going to upgrade my kernel to > the one I'm already running (2.6.15-28-server)? In ideal world, we would never change ABI revision (28 in this case). Luckily, this time upgrade fits in that ideal world :) -- ubuntu-server ma

Re: Loginprompt shows up before booting is finished in Ubuntu Feisty server

2007-06-04 Thread Ante Karamatić
Alex Mauer wrote: > Yes, but the login prompt is close to useless when processes are still > spewing output as you try to login, or if you can't tell that the login > prompt is up since it's already scrolled off the screen. *Far* away from useless, but ok, I get your point. > The solutions (IMO)

Re: 3ware 9650se

2007-06-04 Thread Ante Karamatić
David Kempe wrote: > wondering if anyone is using the above card with dapper? I do. > Particularly, are you using software raid and jbod, or native raid6? > kernel work ok? I use Hardware RAID5, but there is a catch. This card isn't supported in Dapper. There is a patch for it on ubuntu-kerne

Re: Loginprompt shows up before booting is finished in Ubuntu Feisty server

2007-06-03 Thread Ante Karamatić
Ante Karamatić wrote: > IMO, this is a cosmetic bug and should upset you so much. Hit ENTER and ^^ shouldn't :/ -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server

  1   2   >