Hi all,
lprod.org team is going to present to a large public and professionals
available solutions for free audio-video editing based on Ubuntu/Ubuntu
studio here in France the
- next 5 may 09 in Bordeaux, France
- next 16&17 may 09 in Paris, ubuntu-party, France
- next 30 may 09 in Anglet, Fra
Luke,
The custom kernel works wonderfully for me so far. No more crashes. I have been
on it for over a half hour at a time.
And (in case you're interested) on an ext4 partition. I had installed Studio,
booted into recovery mode, installed linux-generic, re-booted into that, then
installed your
On Apr 26, 2009 5:18pm, "Cory K." wrote:
aYo Binitie wrote:
It's not up to me anymore though I carry influence. Jaunty was my last
release doing anything in a *official* capacity. I have other very
important life matters to attend to for now.
The project in a fragile state atm a
Obviously, I've hit a nerve.
For that I apologize. As noted elsewhere, I never meant to denegrate the
work the Ubuntu Studio team has accomplished.
In fact, the blame for my frustration is clearly on me for, as the
crusaider said to Indiana Jones, choosing un-wisely.
Mac
--
Ubuntu-St
aYo Binitie wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Cory K. wrote:
>
>> Luke MacNeil wrote:
>>
>>> but I wanted to note to the developers; We do appreciate your time
>>> and effort, we're just a bit frustrated with the current user experience.
>>> There is good reason for the frustratio
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Cory K. wrote:
> Luke MacNeil wrote:
> > but I wanted to note to the developers; We do appreciate your time
> > and effort, we're just a bit frustrated with the current user experience.
> > There is good reason for the frustration, and while getting attitude from
Luke MacNeil wrote:
> but I wanted to note to the developers; We do appreciate your time
> and effort, we're just a bit frustrated with the current user experience.
> There is good reason for the frustration, and while getting attitude from
> end users is unpleasant, the sentiment can be productive
I still have an unbootable system. I tried reinstalling Ibex and doing
another update from there but ended up with an unbootable system - just the
word "bug" followed by hundreds of digits grouped in columns and rows with
no way out of that screen when I start up. The only reason I was able to
ac
Hey Luke,
The custom kernel is working like a charm. I am having some permission
problems with jack however. I am getting this error:
cannot use real-time scheduling (FIFO at priority 10) [for thread
-1211681088, from thread -1211681088] (1: Operation not permitted)
I noticed that I do not have
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Eric Hedekar wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Eric Hedekar wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:35 AM, mac wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, so why bother to add frebob and ffado to the distro and NOT have
>>> raw1394 loaded by default?
>>>
>>
>> Because it's
On Apr 26, 2009, at 10:50 AM, "laurent.bellegarde" wrote:
> Eric Stewart a écrit :
>> I was assured by someone at Ubuntu Forums that if I use update
>> manager
>> that no data will be written over. What ended up happening is that
>> when it was finished and restarted I just got an error w
On Sunday, April 26, 2009, Cory K. wrote:
> Yes. Skipping releases is *not* recommended. Really, I'd back up the
> important parts of my home dir and do a clean install
I would recommend the same. Upgrade installs have just too many
problems. There's just nothing like a clean install.
--
Christ
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Eric Hedekar wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:35 AM, mac wrote:
>
>> Ok, so why bother to add frebob and ffado to the distro and NOT have
>> raw1394 loaded by default?
>>
>
> Because it's a security risk to have raw1394 loaded by default - at least
> until t
Luke,
Thank you! I'm trying this now.
Kjel
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Luke MacNeil wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Kjel Anderson
> wrote:
>>
>> Susan,
>>
>> I updated your bug report. There was someone in IRC who was having the
>> same problem. Do you know what motherboard
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 7:28 AM, mac wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 09:21 -0500, Brian David wrote:
> > Yeah, I realized that I wrote my statements a bit too broadly up
> > there, so just to make sure no one reads what I said and starts to
> > worry, Ardour IS NOT BROKEN. I have issues with the
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:35 AM, mac wrote:
> Ok, so why bother to add frebob and ffado to the distro and NOT have
> raw1394 loaded by default?
>
Because it's a security risk to have raw1394 loaded by default - at least
until the new juju firewire stack is implemented (a goal for 9.10).
If you
Eric Stewart a écrit :
> I was assured by someone at Ubuntu Forums that if I use update manager
> that no data will be written over. What ended up happening is that
> when it was finished and restarted I just got an error with no
> possible options to go any further. I am using my 8.10 CD rig
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 09:21 -0500, Brian David wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:46 AM, laurent.bellegarde
> wrote:
> Michael Sullivan a écrit :
> >> Thanks for the advice, Scott, I'm actually going to try to
> do this
> >> with the release of Jaunty, now that I f
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:46 AM, laurent.bellegarde <
laurent.bellega...@free.fr> wrote:
> Michael Sullivan a écrit :
> >> Thanks for the advice, Scott, I'm actually going to try to do this
> >> with the release of Jaunty, now that I feel more comfortable with
> >> Linux in general. At the moment
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Kjel Anderson wrote:
> Susan,
>
> I updated your bug report. There was someone in IRC who was having the
> same problem. Do you know what motherboard you have? This fellow on
> IRC and I had the exact same model.
>
> Kjel
>
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Susan
Ok, so why bother to add frebob and ffado to the distro and NOT have
raw1394 loaded by default?
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
I was assured by someone at Ubuntu Forums that if I use update manager that
no data will be written over. What ended up happening is that when it was
finished and restarted I just got an error with no possible options to go
any further. I am using my 8.10 CD right now to try to recover some but
Gustin Johnson wrote:
> Michael Sullivan a wrote:
>
>> Just to clarify, I want to go from Ubuntu Studio 8.04 to Ubuntu Studio
>> 9.04... without a clean install if possible.
>>
>>
> Upgrade to 8.10, then upgrade to 9.04. You can only skip intermediate
> releases if you are moving from LT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Sullivan wrote:
>> --
>> -Brian David
> To further add to my confusion, now it seems like the update manager
> wants to upgrade 464 packages even though the DVD isn't in the drive and
> I have tossed the iso from the hard drive. Is this be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Sullivan wrote:
> Just to clarify, I want to go from Ubuntu Studio 8.04 to Ubuntu Studio
> 9.04... without a clean install if possible.
>
Upgrade to 8.10, then upgrade to 9.04. You can only skip intermediate
releases if you are moving from L
25 matches
Mail list logo
