On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:36:49 +0300, Janne Jokitalo wrote:
>Yes, that's moving to more sophisticated usage. And quite frankly, if
>we're talking about technologically inexperienced people, wouldn't
>they use a GUI (Software Center?) anyway?
Not in regards to the wiki, help pages or when solving
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 09:27:49AM +0200, br...@linuxsynths.com wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:01:03 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > apt and apt-get make not much of a difference, it's just that apt does
> > use an easy to understand name instead if dist-upgrade, which is
> On 30 Aug 2016, at 09:27, br...@linuxsynths.com wrote:
> I would hazard a guess however, that if one of the two has a GUI, then I
> would probably go with that. Newbies like GUIs I think. Lots of people have a
> bad taste in their mouths about linux because it was so terminal-based.
>
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:01:03 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon,
29 Aug 2016 10:14:55 +0200, br...@linuxsynths.com [1]wrote:
>
>> Funny!
I would have said about the same thing, but for apt-get.
>
> Hi,
>
>
apt and apt-get make not much of a difference, it's just that apt does
>
use an
