If you won't build a kernel and apps yourself you should switch to AV
Linux or Planet CCRMA etc. and avoid openArtist, Ubuntu Studio etc..
Lurk Linux audio mailing lists ;).
I've already used AV Linux and Planet CCRMA before, but not after
upgrading my PC, I'll try them soon on it :-)
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 18:12 +, Fernando Gomes wrote:
and for others with similar problems
that I had (putting a low latency kernel on a Ubuntu Maverick
installation), I've made a post on my 'web log', at
http://www.openstudio.info
Thank you ... worked like a champ on my Dell Inspiron.
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 18:12 +, Fernando Gomes wrote:
If you won't build a kernel and apps yourself you should switch to AV
Linux or Planet CCRMA etc. and avoid openArtist, Ubuntu Studio etc..
Lurk Linux audio mailing lists ;).
I've already used AV Linux and Planet CCRMA before, but
I commited the error of updating do Maverick to find out that there
was no 'special' kernel to it ;-)
I can tell you that using the standard Maverick Ubuntu Kernel i don't
have many issues, using hydrogen, rackarack and zynaddsubfx, even with
some processor hungry effects on rackarack.But today
i am using abogani's kernels in both maverick and natty on a testing
machine, with great results... this is a nice guide i found when google-ing
'ubuntu 10.10 realtime kernel' about the 6th result down...
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 10:54 -0600, Brian David wrote:
For Maverick:
There are no official real-time kernels available for Maverick. Some
people seem to have successfully used Bogani's Natty kernels with
Maverick, so that is perhaps an option. There are other PPAs
available, as well, and
PS: Perhaps a package is missing :), so install it too, what I wrote +
additional package:
[snip]
# synaptic
Install:
git-core
libncurse5
libncurse5-dev
libelf-dev
[snip]
Correct timer from 250Hz to 1000Hz
Timerferq ;)
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
PPS:
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 21:01 +, Bernard Hurley wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:54:51AM -0600, Brian David wrote:
There are other issues with real-time in Maverick and Natty that have
recently come to light. This page will fill you in:
http://jackaudio.org/linux_group_sched
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 21:01 +, Bernard Hurley wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:54:51AM -0600, Brian David wrote:
On a total tangent - can any of you comment (in lay terms if possible) on
the real-time kernel?
Personally I am running Maverick but am using Bogani's Lucid kernel most
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Mike Holstein mikeh...@gmail.com wrote:
i am using abogani's kernels in both maverick and natty on a testing
machine, with great results... this is a nice guide i found when google-ing
'ubuntu 10.10 realtime kernel' about the 6th result down...
i just got the -lowlatency one, and i just installed the 2 main packages and
didnt use the one that had dependency issues... the -realtime one is older
anyways, and i think abogani said he needed to wait on something upstream
before making it... im finding great performance with the -lowlatency in
Pfff :(
I guess the dependencies will be found in the regular Ubuntu Natty
repositories ;).
I'm not sure if Ubuntu Studio or this list can be taken seriously,
because especially a real-time system needs to be proper.
There are reasons that Natty repositories are for Natty and not for
Maverick.
On a total tangent - can any of you comment (in lay terms if possible) on
the real-time kernel? I was under the impression that Ubuntu Studio utilizes
a real time kernel, making it superior to other OS's, distros or flavors of
Ubuntu. I thought I had read somewhere that this RTK has been
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:54:51AM -0600, Brian David wrote:
On a total tangent - can any of you comment (in lay terms if possible) on
the real-time kernel?
Personally I am running Maverick but am using Bogani's Lucid kernel most of the
time but I have several kernels instlled so I can
On 01/11/2011 10:01 PM, Bernard Hurley wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:54:51AM -0600, Brian David wrote:
On a total tangent - can any of you comment (in lay terms if possible) on
the real-time kernel?
Personally I am running Maverick but am using Bogani's Lucid kernel most of
the time
Hey again Fernando,
Thanks for your additional comments and suggestions. Yes, it is definitely a
plain US-122. I would LOVE to hear about distros you found where it worked
out of the box - that would be a dream come true.
On a total tangent - can any of you comment (in lay terms if possible) on
16 matches
Mail list logo
