On Friday 30 November 2007, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> FTW = For the win
For the Windows, or is this some football/soccer reference or something?
I still feel old.
> EMO = A goth without enough culture to know he's a goth, and who
> thinks he's cool because he is uncool.
Still confused, but
> Bergamo
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 10:35 AM
>
> To: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion
> Subject: RE: Rosegarden in GTK FTW!!!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Evan Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>
>
> LMao, my sister is borderli
Studio Users Help and Discussion
Subject: RE: Rosegarden in GTK FTW!!!
Evan Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
LMao, my sister is borderline EMO. Like dressing all black, always sad
moving toward isolation. The ones who you can see cutting themselves.
Funny! Back in my old days :^)
Evan Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:LMao, my sister is borderline EMO.
Like dressing all black, always sad
moving toward isolation. The ones who you can see cutting themselves.
Funny! Back in my old days :^) these people were called gothics. Do emos like
graveyards, vampires and stuff
You guys!!
This is a Ubuntu Studio discussion group!!! You could at least say OT!!
lol!!
google: define whatever
On 11/30/07, Luis de Bethencourt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> FTW = For the win
> WTF = FTW backwards and well, you know
>
> EMO = A goth without enough culture to know he's a got
FTW = For the win
WTF = FTW backwards and well, you know
EMO = A goth without enough culture to know he's a goth, and who
thinks he's cool because he is uncool.
On Nov 30, 2007 2:23 AM, D. Michael McIntyre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 29 November 2007, Evan Gill wrote:
>
> > LMao, my
On Thursday 29 November 2007, Evan Gill wrote:
> LMao, my sister is borderline EMO. Like dressing all black, always sad
> moving toward isolation. The ones who you can see cutting themselves.
How is this different from a goth?
No, nevermind, you'll just confuse the old guy.
I'm going to go list
: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion
Subject: Re: Rosegarden in GTK FTW!!!
> Michael, I'm so tempted to say "gimp in qt ftw!"
> But that would be just wrong, so I won't.
> Just kidding,
Which reminds me, I still haven't figured out WTF, "FTW" mea
> Michael, I'm so tempted to say "gimp in qt ftw!"
> But that would be just wrong, so I won't.
> Just kidding,
Which reminds me, I still haven't figured out WTF, "FTW" means. I think this
means I am old now.
That, and I have no idea what an "emo" is, even after I looked it up. I've
never seen
On Nov 27, 2007 4:06 AM, D. Michael McIntyre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 26 November 2007, xhi wrote:
>
> > It certainly doesn't bother me, I think Rosegarden looks just fine in
> > UbuntuStudio under Gnome, I don't see the problem.
>
> So do I, incidentally. I tried the new devel versi
On Monday 26 November 2007, xhi wrote:
> It certainly doesn't bother me, I think Rosegarden looks just fine in
> UbuntuStudio under Gnome, I don't see the problem.
So do I, incidentally. I tried the new devel version both ways, with and
without the bundled theme, and it looks good enough to sui
Hey, THANKS Knew it was something like that, but never knew how to
change it... :-)
That'll be much better, I'm sure. I used to use KDE...
On Nov 26, 2007 1:34 PM, xhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rafael F. Compte wrote:
> > Christopher Stamper wrote:
> >
> >> Well, whatever. But, QT is ugly
Rafael F. Compte wrote:
> Christopher Stamper wrote:
>
>> Well, whatever. But, QT is ugly
>>
>
> Let me help you with that!
>
> Go to Synaptic and download the qtconfig package (version 3 or 4, it depends
> on the app).
> Use that program to change the appearance until you are satisfied.
Christopher Stamper wrote:
>Well, whatever. But, QT is ugly
Let me help you with that!
Go to Synaptic and download the qtconfig package (version 3 or 4, it depends
on the app).
Use that program to change the appearance until you are satisfied.
By the way Qjackctl uses qt4, which blends really
Well, whatever. But, QT is ugly, when you have gnome and beryl. :-)
People who don't like linux really don't like the qt 'effect'. There should
be a standard, not that I'm willing to do it.:-)
Actually, if I had read the first message, I would have known that it was a
joke. But I didn't get the m
It wasn't my intention to start a useless flamewar: it was an obvoius
joke.
If someone has time to code on a project like Rosegarden, this time
would be surely better spent on enhancements/new features different from
a window toolkit port, in my opinion.
And I am a Gnome user too, but *I don't hat
What?? I *hate* QT!
Fine? I dont think so!
Oh well, guess I didn't catch on to that one. Again...
FYI really don't like qt.
On Nov 23, 2007 1:22 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess it needs to be pointed out that my reply, as well as Luis's were
> jokes. Michael got it and
I guess it needs to be pointed out that my reply, as well as Luis's were
jokes. Michael got it and others should realize that as well.
Rosegarden is fine in QT. If you don't like oh well.
-Cory \m/
Christopher Stamper wrote:
> Right!!!
>
> I just used Rosegarden for the first time yesterday. An
Right!!!
I just used Rosegarden for the first time yesterday. And was disgusted by
the QT look. Is it that hard to change it???
BTW, gusty's JACK controller looks disgusting. What's the matter with it? ->
always used to look good, like in fesity.. Oh, and QaMix too...
I know that qAmic was a kde
Can we talk about the hot chicks that keep bugging Michael? Somewhere
I heard the ratio is 7 women per men... I think he is getting mine.
About QT/GTK visual integration... it is true what Cory says, KDE4
blends so nicely, it will make all of us "switch that qt app to gtk"
lovers very happy becaus
> This wont be a issue with apps that use QT4 though. I saw JACK Control
> recently using it and man, wow. It fits in nicely with GNOME. At 1st
> glance you'd be hard pressed to know its not GNOME.
Now you have me scared. :)
--
D. Michael McIntyre
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-St
D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> We've actually had more than two people file feature requests to this
> effect.
> Sure, we'll rewrite the entire GUI in a different toolkit, because all the
> guts stuff are supposed to be toolkit-independent. No problem. Just give me
> about two hours, and I'll hav
22 matches
Mail list logo
