Re: recording vocals

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 sandie wrote: > btw. I always use a 32bit version, the 64bit is to immature for my taste > (had lots of problems with wine, alsa and jack) but I test it whenever > theres a new Ubuntu-release. The only place I have expirenced a > remarkable differe

Re: recording vocals

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fernando Gomes wrote: > Yes, I had the ATI driver working on the 9.04 (non rt) after manually > installing it - I didn't remember exactly the process to do it, but it > worked (this is why now I'm logging my "work" on openstudio.info, this > way I hav

Re: Re: recording vocals

On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:15 PM, wrote: > On Oct 9, 2009 11:05am, Fernando Gomes wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:25 PM, sandie san...@sandgreen.dk> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> Hi Teza and Sandie >> >> >> >> My PC doesn't even boot with 8.10 and 9.04 rt kernels, but works very >> >> well with 8.04 an

Re: Re: recording vocals

On Oct 9, 2009 11:05am, Fernando Gomes wrote: On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:25 PM, sandie san...@sandgreen.dk> wrote: Hi Teza and Sandie My PC doesn't even boot with 8.10 and 9.04 rt kernels, but works very well with 8.04 and also works (more or less) with 9.10 beta. I built custom r

Re: recording vocals

On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:25 PM, sandie wrote: > teza wrote: >> Hi ,Sandie, just a question, what will be your choice between Hardy and >> Jaunty 32 bits, for my point of view I will choose the Hardy, but I >> never use Jaunty 32 bits. Is there any troubles with rt kernel in >> Jaunty? >> Thanks fo

Re: recording vocals

teza wrote: > Hi ,Sandie, just a question, what will be your choice between Hardy and > Jaunty 32 bits, for my point of view I will choose the Hardy, but I > never use Jaunty 32 bits. Is there any troubles with rt kernel in > Jaunty? > Thanks for your help. > > Regards from Paris (France) > Teza >

Re: recording vocals

Hi ,Sandie, just a question, what will be your choice between Hardy and Jaunty 32 bits, for my point of view I will choose the Hardy, but I never use Jaunty 32 bits. Is there any troubles with rt kernel in Jaunty? Thanks for your help. Regards from Paris (France) Teza ...

Re: recording vocals

teza wrote: > Hi everybody, I think it will be a good idea to tell to the list what > equipment we are using with Ubuntustudio, that will help in coming up > with recommendations for what to get. We can make a list on the web > about what equipement is working well with Linux. > > At the moment I'm

Re: Re: recording vocals

Hi everybody, I think it will be a good idea to tell to the list what equipment we are using with Ubuntustudio, that will help in coming up with recommendations for what to get. We can make a list on the web about what equipement is working well with Linux. At the moment I'm use a fastrack from M

Re: Re: recording vocals

Yeah, I should've just stuck with 8.04. @Jason - I found this USB interface, which is $150 new: http://reviews.harmony-central.com/reviews/Computer+Recording+Interfaces/product/Lexicon/Lambda/10/1 I got mine for $80 off ebay. On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 11:49 AM, wrote: > On Oct 8, 2009 9:50am, And

Re: recording vocals

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Gustin Johnson wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Gustin Johnson > > wrote: > > > > I completely disagree. I for one do notice a difference between 3 > GiB > > of RAM and 8 GiB of RAM, especially on my DAW. > > > > > >

Re: recording vocals

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christopher Stamper wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Gustin Johnson > wrote: > > I completely disagree. I for one do notice a difference between 3 GiB > of RAM and 8 GiB of RAM, especially on my DAW.

Re: recording vocals

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Gustin Johnson wrote: > I completely disagree. I for one do notice a difference between 3 GiB > of RAM and 8 GiB of RAM, especially on my DAW. > That's the *only* advantage. If you can do without that much RAM, than by all means use 32bit. 64bit is a mess. My 2c

Re: recording vocals

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Oikle wrote: > Stick to 32 bit for audio. 64 bit has absolutely zero benefit for > recording. Benchmarks show that in some cases 64 bit can underperform > 32 bit and it's only beneficial to extreme number crunching scientists > that need that

Re: Re: recording vocals

I absolutely agree with recent comments about 64bit. While Hardy 8.04 was a good release, I have installed or upgraded several machines running to 9.04 32bit with excellent results. My current recording machine has 9.04, rt kernel and I use both Firepods and Audiofire12's. At Thursday, 08 Oc

Re: Re: recording vocals

On Oct 8, 2009 9:50am, Andrew Oikle wrote: Stick to 32 bit for audio. 64 bit has absolutely zero benefit for recording. Benchmarks show that in some cases 64 bit can underperform 32 bit and it's only beneficial to extreme number crunching scientists that need that level of precision, and al

Re: recording vocals

Stick to 32 bit for audio. 64 bit has absolutely zero benefit for recording. Benchmarks show that in some cases 64 bit can underperform 32 bit and it's only beneficial to extreme number crunching scientists that need that level of precision, and also for gigantic databases. Selling 64 bit proces

Re: recording vocals

On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Mike Su wrote: > would you say 32 bit 8.04 is more stable than 64 bit 9.04 studio? > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:20 PM, wrote: > >> On Oct 5, 2009 12:51am, "Jason M. Christos" >> wrote: >> > what is good microphone in the $200 range to record vocals that is >> c

Re: recording vocals

would you say 32 bit 8.04 is more stable than 64 bit 9.04 studio? On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:20 PM, wrote: > On Oct 5, 2009 12:51am, "Jason M. Christos" > wrote: > > what is good microphone in the $200 range to record vocals that is > compatible with ubuntu studio? I would prefer to hear from so

Re: recording vocals

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:20 PM, wrote: > On Oct 5, 2009 12:51am, "Jason M. Christos" > wrote: >> what is good microphone in the $200 range to record vocals that is >> compatible with ubuntu studio? I would prefer to hear from someone who has >> actually used the combination to record vocals, tha

Re: recording vocals

On Oct 5, 2009 12:51am, "Jason M. Christos" wrote: what is good microphone in the $200 range to record vocals that is compatible with ubuntu studio? I would prefer to hear from someone who has actually used the combination to record vocals, thanks in advance -- - Jason M. Christos http://

Re: recording vocals

Hi Jason I'm using a M-Audio Nova mic (about $100), connected to the Tascam US-122 USB audio interface. I've recently added the Behringer MIC800 modeling preamp, but haven't made any real test with it. I like the sound with the M-Audio Nova + Tascam US122 combination the problem for me is that the

Re: recording vocals

Hi, microphones have nothing to do with compabilitiy with Ubuntustudio, perhaps for usb-microphones, yes, but for recording, regular microphones are used that are connected to a soundcard. I use this setup : microphone -> mixer -> soundcard -> computer(ubuntustudio) you could also try : microph