On 08/04/12 20:03, Norman Silverstone wrote:
snip
I think we all ought to shout at the gimp folk. Gimp is an incredibly
capable program, and it is also the least intuitive and least workable
that I have ever seen! If the Gimp folk wanted to sell it for cash,
there would be no chance!
We're collating this round of testing at 07:00 UTC on Monday but if
you do find any bugs over the next few weeks, do please let us know.
Cheers,
- --
Alan Pope
I run as many of the test I could. I installed a spare drive into a Dell
latitude D610 laptop and installed from DVD. I have run
This has appeared on Linux Today site:
Should you be worried about Ubuntu Desktop's privacy settings?
LinuxBSDos: I hope that I am wrong, but your new Ubuntu system could be
used to spy on you.
http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2012-04-09-002-41-SC-UB
Should someone [in a position
On 9 April 2012 09:24, Bill Baker boo...@gmail.com wrote:
This has appeared on Linux Today site:
Should you be worried about Ubuntu Desktop's privacy settings?
LinuxBSDos: I hope that I am wrong, but your new Ubuntu system could be
used to spy on you.
On 09/04/12 09:24, Bill Baker wrote:
This has appeared on Linux Today site:
Should you be worried about Ubuntu Desktop's privacy settings?
LinuxBSDos: I hope that I am wrong, but your new Ubuntu system could be
used to spy on you.
On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 10:29 +0100, Alan Bell wrote:
On 09/04/12 09:24, Bill Baker wrote:
This has appeared on Linux Today site:
Should you be worried about Ubuntu Desktop's privacy settings?
LinuxBSDos: I hope that I am wrong, but your new Ubuntu system could be
used to spy on you.
snip
That's a shame. I'd be interested in knowing exactly which test it was
and we can fix the text description pretty easily for future tests.
For example I am asked to run gedit. No problem, I go to Applications,
Accessories and select Text Editor. Problem, there is no heading
On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 10:29:02 +0100
Alan Bell alanb...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 09/04/12 09:24, Bill Baker wrote:
This has appeared on Linux Today site:
Should you be worried about Ubuntu Desktop's privacy settings?
LinuxBSDos: I hope that I am wrong, but your new Ubuntu system could be
On 08/04/12 20:41, Alan Pope wrote:
Interesting feedback Barry. I certainly didn't expect this, but then I
naïvely expected people on this list to have taken a look at 12.04
previously, and be familiar with the basics. Thanks for highlighting this.
Maybe a bit of over-reaction on my part.
On 09/04/12 10:20, Simon Greenwood wrote:
On 9 April 2012 09:24, Bill Baker boo...@gmail.com
mailto:boo...@gmail.com wrote:
This has appeared on Linux Today site:
Should you be worried about Ubuntu Desktop's privacy settings?
LinuxBSDos: I hope that I am wrong, but your new
On 09/04/12 12:22, Barry Drake wrote:
On 08/04/12 20:41, Alan Pope wrote:
Interesting feedback Barry. I certainly didn't expect this, but then I
naïvely expected people on this list to have taken a look at 12.04
previously, and be familiar with the basics. Thanks for highlighting this.
On 09/04/12 11:20, Steve wrote:
The problem is not with the journalist but, Ubuntu. The explanations as to
what is going on with these settings can best be described as vague. Until
Alan's explanation I wasn't sure what they're for. I've submitted a bug
#977106 to LP if people would like
Hi,
i was watching a film today and i wanted the screen to go off some time after i
was done watching the film. I found the max time for screen to go off is either
1 hour or never. Is there a way to set it to 2 or 3 hours. Or maybe a costume
time?--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
On 9 April 2012 14:37, Alan Bell alan.b...@libertus.co.uk wrote:
On 09/04/12 11:20, Steve wrote:
The problem is not with the journalist but, Ubuntu. The explanations as
to what is going on with these settings can best be described as vague.
Until Alan's explanation I wasn't sure what
On 09/04/12 15:16, Colin Law wrote:
On 9 April 2012 14:37, Alan Bell alan.b...@libertus.co.uk wrote:
On 09/04/12 11:20, Steve wrote:
The problem is not with the journalist but, Ubuntu. The explanations as
to what is going on with these settings can best be described as vague.
Until Alan's
On 9 April 2012 16:18, Bruno Girin brunogi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/04/12 15:16, Colin Law wrote:
On 9 April 2012 14:37, Alan Bell alan.b...@libertus.co.uk wrote:
On 09/04/12 11:20, Steve wrote:
The problem is not with the journalist but, Ubuntu. The explanations as
to what is going on
On 09/04/12 16:46, Colin Law wrote:
On 9 April 2012 16:18, Bruno Girin brunogi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/04/12 15:16, Colin Law wrote:
On 9 April 2012 14:37, Alan Bell alan.b...@libertus.co.uk wrote:
On 09/04/12 11:20, Steve wrote:
The problem is not with the journalist but, Ubuntu. The
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 15:16:31 +0100
Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 9 April 2012 14:37, Alan Bell alan.b...@libertus.co.uk wrote:
On 09/04/12 11:20, Steve wrote:
The problem is not with the journalist but, Ubuntu. The explanations as
to what is going on with these settings
hi,
looks like you tube shows in shades of blue. Really wierd. i was able to see a
bbc film alright though. I'm using firefox on ubuntu 11.10.
Probably some configuration that my toddler pressed that i have no way to find
out. By the way: if you want to test os and apps use a toddler as as a
On 09/04/12 20:34, Andres Muniz wrote:
hi,
looks like you tube shows in shades of blue. Really wierd. i was able
to see a bbc film alright though. I'm using firefox on ubuntu 11.10.
Probably some configuration that my toddler pressed that i have no way
to find out. By the way: if you want
On 9 April 2012 19:20, Steve yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 15:16:31 +0100
Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 9 April 2012 14:37, Alan Bell alan.b...@libertus.co.uk wrote:
On 09/04/12 11:20, Steve wrote:
The problem is not with the journalist but,
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 20:48:15 +0100
Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've been at my parents today and showed it to them to see what they
thought. They're both Ubuntu users but rarely fiddle with settings. To
say they were baffled would be an understatement. They really weren't
22 matches
Mail list logo
