[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1752053] Re: nvidia-390 fails to boot graphical display

2018-05-11 Thread Milan Pultar
I am not sure whether it is ok to post here, but I have lately found this github repo dedicated to making Ubuntu run on XPS 9560. It works for Ubuntu 17.10 and 18.04 will be hopefully added as well. Many of us have this laptop and the repo partly adresses the issues mentioned here so I thought post

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1752053] Re: nvidia-390 fails to boot graphical display

2018-05-02 Thread Milan Pultar
Hi. I am new to this forum. I have recently bought Dell XPS 15 9560 with GTX 1050 graphic card. I am trying Ubuntu 18.04, but I can't find any working nvidia driver. From ppa I tried 384, 390 as well as 396, each installation results in black screen. If I uninstall nvidia driver, laptop boots norma

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1103723] Re: the evdev driver of Xorg ignore the swap axes optiopn for N-trig multitouch

2013-11-23 Thread Milan Draca
Thanks Anikin. If I ever see you I will get You all the beers you can drink and what ever you wont! Works fine! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-input-evdev in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1103723

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1138594] [NEW] screen parts are black

2013-03-01 Thread Miguel Milan
Public bug reported: page not responding black parts // ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+1ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-8.17-generic 3.8.0 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-8-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl ApportVersion: 2.8-0ubuntu4 Architecture: i386 CompizP

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1081009]

2013-01-30 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Ah, thanks, great! Now I see that the two patches from Comment #144 and Comment #145 are included in 3.7.3. So I guess the real fix you're talking about it the one from Comment #143. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-vi

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1081009]

2013-01-30 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
I can confirm I have not experienced the bug with drm-intel-next after several days of testing. What's the procedure next? Are the patches going to be backported to 3.7.x? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel i

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1088271] Re: X startup fails with "failed to get resources" error after update to 3.5.0-18

2012-12-22 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #889687 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889687 ** Also affects: fedora via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889687 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 221112]

2012-06-22 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Ping! ;-) Sergey, can you commit any solution? Better get a fix than wait for ages to be sure it's the best choice. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xkeyboard-config in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221112 Title: Can'

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 805700]

2012-04-27 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Sorry, I'm not sure I can help. Be sure to run first make-kpkg clean so that the package is really built. But you'd better ask on Ubuntu IRC or mailing lists. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu. ht

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 805700]

2012-04-27 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Not sure, but the docs say the .deb are created in the parent directory of the current directory: > Change to one directory level up (this is where the linux-image and > linux-header .deb files were put) > >cd .. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, whi

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 805700]

2012-04-13 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
You didn't install the needed package from the Prerequisites section: sudo apt-get install git-core kernel-package fakeroot build-essential ncurses-dev -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu. https://b

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 805700]

2012-04-13 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
That's because you need to build the kernel before installing it. What happens if you follow the Ubuntu instructions? In particular, have you run this? CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=`getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN` fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version=-custom kernel_image kernel_headers -- You recei

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 805700]

2012-04-13 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
As the message says, you need to configure the kernel. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/GitKernelBuild The simplest solution is to use the Ubuntu default configuration: cp /boot/config-`uname -r` .config -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is s

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 805700]

2012-04-13 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
(In reply to comment #27) > Thanks, Chris. That's what 'bisect' means! :) > > Can you or anyone tell me how to 'download the source for both of those into a > single git tree and recompile both'? I am willing to help further, but I > don't > have time to spend hours or days working out how to d

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 428884] Re: gnome-screensaver-command --poke no longer inhibits screensaver

2012-03-01 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
** Bug watch added: VLC Trac #4739 http://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/4739 ** Changed in: vlc Importance: Undecided => Unknown ** Changed in: vlc Status: Won't Fix => Unknown ** Changed in: vlc Remote watch: None => VLC Trac #4739 -- You received this bug notification because yo

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 805700]

2012-02-18 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
FWIW, you can install most kernels from Ubuntu packages here: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/ Even the packages marked as Maverick or Natty should more or less work with Oneiric. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xse

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 805700]

2012-02-18 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
(In reply to comment #21) > Thanks, Milan - yes, that info is worth a lot. :) > > So .. the Lucid version of Xorg correctly loads the 'intel' driver for kernel > 2.6.32.28 (probably need to repeat test with the current Xorg?) > > It is likely (but to be confirmed)

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 805700] Re: Natty&Oneiric - intel 82945G/GZ graphics card - Intel driver fails

2012-02-15 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45978 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 805700] Re: Natty&Oneiric - intel 82945G/GZ graphics card - Intel driver fails

2012-02-12 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Could somebody report this to Intel developers? The mail sent to the kernel mailing list seems to have been missed. You can file a bug to the X.org bug tracker at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=xorg Feel free to paste a link to the mail, which has detailed information: http://m

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 221112]

2012-01-07 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Could you make a choice at last? This bug is very annoying, and since the solution is here, please decide fast about it. Thanks! ;-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xkeyboard-config in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22111

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 129041] Re: xterm icon available by default

2011-05-20 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Is XTerm still installed by default? If yes, then the solution is to mark it as hidden - or to stop installing it by default. ** Changed in: xterm (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xt

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 264857] Re: First X session crashes after secondary local X logon

2011-04-29 Thread Milan Knizek
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264857 Title: First X

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 686216] Re: Brightness is all the way down at login screen on HP Pavilion dm4

2011-02-18 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Hm, "this bug only affects Plymouth": this is true for me, but apparently not for the other reporters, so maybe it's more severe on other "submodels" of dm4. Andrew, what is the exact reference of your laptop? Can you also confirm again that the GDM login screen (where you choose your user account)

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 686216] Re: Brightness is all the way down at login screen on HP Pavilion dm4

2011-02-18 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
>From the Fedora bug report: > I have an HP Pavilion DM4-1060US. If I remove rhgb quiet from the boot line, > it > appears that the blank screen begins when the kernel initially configures the > console framebuffer. Once the full X server starts via gdm, display is > visible. > > Similar to Descr

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 686216] Re: Brightness is all the way down at login screen on HP Pavilion dm4

2011-02-18 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #659935 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659935 ** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659935 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification beca

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 683648] [NEW] i915 driver is in really bad shape in Maverick

2010-12-01 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel [Sorry for the silly title. ;-)] The Intel driver in Maverick (2.12.0) is almost unusable for i915 because of redraw issues. Damaged areas don't seem to get repainted as needed, which mostly happens with scrolling areas (web page

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 560180] Re: wacom buttons don't work/cause mouse to move to upper left corner and click.

2010-06-20 Thread Milan Knizek
I tried to apply the patch mentioned in #11: http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxwacom-de...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00736.html to the current version of linuxwaxom in Lucid and recompiled the deb package. The buttons on my Intuos3 work, but the left and right touchpad not - nothing happens and keys

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 575724] Re: /etc/dbus-1/system.d/xserver-xorg.conf allows D-BUS interfaces on all objects

2010-05-06 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Hmm, right, that explains why it's so badly written. This file doesn't appear to be shipped with any package. I was misled by bug 325706, where creating this file was a workaround. ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid -- /etc/dbus-1/system.d/xserver-xorg.conf allows D-

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 575724] Re: /etc/dbus-1/system.d/xserver-xorg.conf allows D-BUS interfaces on all objects

2010-05-05 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
We don't need X.org logs and hardware information for that bug. :-) ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Triaged ** Tags removed: needs-lspci-vvnn needs-xorglog -- /etc/dbus-1/system.d/xserver-xorg.conf allows

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 575724] [NEW] /etc/dbus-1/system.d/xserver-xorg.conf allows D-BUS interfaces on all objects

2010-05-05 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg In Lucid (xserver-xorg1:7.5+5ubuntu1), /etc/dbus-1/system.d/xserver- xorg.conf reads:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 325706] Re: [jaunty] Xephyr fails with D-Bus AccessDenied

2010-05-05 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Seems to work here, but I don't think the bug is properly solved. The problem is still the same: D-Bus configuration doesn't allow for more than 3 X displays (:0, :1 and :2), so others will fail. But maybe I'm missing something, because here Xephyr is on :11 and it works... -- [jaunty] Xephyr fa

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 447159] Re: [i945gm] Xorg assert failure: X: ../../src/i830_batchbuffer.h:79: intel_batch_emit_dword: Assertion `pI830->batch_ptr != ((void *)0)' failed.

2010-04-03 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
dicka: Personally, I've opened bug 553176 as I said above, since I'm tracking this bug for quite a long time now. You may have a look there and see whether that seems to be the same bug, but the best would be to get Apport upload necessary information to a new report, and explain there why you don'

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 447159] Re: [i945gm] Xorg assert failure: X: ../../src/i830_batchbuffer.h:79: intel_batch_emit_dword: Assertion `pI830->batch_ptr != ((void *)0)' failed.

2010-04-03 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Hmm, I wouldn't like to hijack your report. If other people can confirm the new kernel fixed their crash here, we should just mark it as fixed and continue with other reports. Seems the error message is very generic, and may come from different bugs in the kernel. So, sorry, I'm closing again. I'll

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 447159] Re: [i945gm] Xorg assert failure: X: ../../src/i830_batchbuffer.h:79: intel_batch_emit_dword: Assertion `pI830->batch_ptr != ((void *)0)' failed.

2010-04-02 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
So let's reopen it for now, waiting for more informations from developers... ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- [i945gm] Xorg assert failure: X: ../../src/i830_batchbuffer.h:79: intel_batch_emit_dword: Assertion `pI830->batch_ptr !=

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 447159] Re: [i945gm] Xorg assert failure: X: ../../src/i830_batchbuffer.h:79: intel_batch_emit_dword: Assertion `pI830->batch_ptr != ((void *)0)' failed.

2010-04-01 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Robert: I've been able to reproduce the same kind of crash with the new kernel 2.6.32-19. See bugs 553174 and 553176 - now I'm not sure that's the very same bug. Should I keep them separate and meave this one as fixed? -- [i945gm] Xorg assert failure: X: ../../src/i830_batchbuffer.h:79: intel_ba

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 553174] Re: Xorg assert failure: X: ../../src/i830_batchbuffer.h:79: intel_batch_emit_dword: Assertion `pI830->batch_ptr != ((void *)0)' failed.

2010-04-01 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
See bug 553176 for the kernel oops that likely caused the X crash. Especially: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42769271/OopsText.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #26974 http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26974 ** Also affects: xorg-serve

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 447159] Re: [i945gm] Xorg assert failure: X: ../../src/i830_batchbuffer.h:79: intel_batch_emit_dword: Assertion `pI830->batch_ptr != ((void *)0)' failed.

2010-03-31 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
You know, I've reproduced it with the Intel development branch of 2.6.33 too, so it's clearly not gone... -- [i945gm] Xorg assert failure: X: ../../src/i830_batchbuffer.h:79: intel_batch_emit_dword: Assertion `pI830->batch_ptr != ((void *)0)' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447159 You re

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 447159] Re: [i945gm] Xorg assert failure: X: ../../src/i830_batchbuffer.h:79: intel_batch_emit_dword: Assertion `pI830->batch_ptr != ((void *)0)' failed.

2010-03-30 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
That's a very annoying bug I've been tracking for some time. I had already reported it separately some time ago, and provided upstream with some additional debugging information there. I really hope they are going to investigate this further. ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #26974

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 365994] Re: [i915] X freeze due to end of aperture kernel issue

2010-03-09 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Yes, the freeze still exists in Karmic, but it comes from another bug. I'm marking this one as Fix Released for Linux, since a fix was released via Intel X.org/Linux developers. I've continued tracking the problem upstream, and you can have a look at http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2697

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 325706] Re: [jaunty] Xephyr fails with D-Bus AccessDenied

2010-01-07 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Sure, that's really a trivial workaround on a desktop box... $ sudo apt-get remove dbus [...] 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 361 to remove and 2 not upgraded. After this operation, 1173MB disk space will be freed. Are you sure you're using Ubuntu? :D -- [jaunty] Xephyr fails with D-Bus AccessDe

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 399727] Re: Display preferences don't reverse from bad mode forcing xorg.conf edit

2009-08-01 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Sorry, you chose the wrong project. The bug is not in the gnome-system- tools. ** Also affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gst Status: New => Invalid -- Display preferences don't reverse from bad mode forcing xorg.conf edit https://bugs.launc

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 325706] Re: [jaunty] Xephyr fails with D-Bus AccessDenied

2009-07-28 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- [jaunty] Xephyr fails with D-Bus AccessDenied https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-server in ubuntu. __

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 325706] Re: [jaunty] Xephyr fails with D-Bus AccessDenied

2009-07-01 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Looks like a Sugar problem to me, since the errors come from Python, not Xephyr. Please open a new report. -- [jaunty] Xephyr fails with D-Bus AccessDenied https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-s

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 325706] Re: [jaunty] Xephyr fails with D-Bus AccessDenied

2009-07-01 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
I'm not sure were the real problem happens in your log. The (EE) messages are not fatal IIRC, I've been seeing them in working environments. But please report this separately, I'd even expect it to be specific to Sugar. -- [jaunty] Xephyr fails with D-Bus AccessDenied https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 376092] Re: [i945] Running Out of Memory with Compiz (UXA bug)

2009-06-20 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Are you sure it has entered mesa master? The comments only say the patch is good, but no trace of inclusion. Please confirm so that we can give that information upstream. Anyway, I'm still seeing this bug, which is not the very same as the one that has been fixed. Using mesa from xorg-edgers, 2009

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 376092] Re: [i945] Running Out of Memory with Compiz (UXA bug)

2009-06-19 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Bryce: For the record, I'm using composited Metacity here, and also seeing the bug. -- [i945] Running Out of Memory with Compiz (UXA bug) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is the registrant for xf86-video-intel.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 383411] Re: Text corruption with latest UXA-default Intel driver

2009-06-09 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Just for memory, upstream's 'invalid' comes form the fact this bug is a duplicate of a previous one that seems to have been fixed in kernel 2.6.30rc8. -- Text corruption with latest UXA-default Intel driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383411 You received this bug notification because you are

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 383411] Re: Text corruption with latest UXA-default Intel driver

2009-06-05 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
I'm seeing the same kind of symptoms too, and your observations fit mine. I can note that I've seen that behavior for at least two weeks. Jaunty, i915 GM, driver 2.7.99 from two days ago. Upstream asked me to try with kernel 2.6.30rc8, which I'm doing now. -- Text corruption with latest UXA-defau

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 381981] Re: Some icons and text disappear in OpenOffice (fixed upstream)

2009-06-01 Thread Milan
OK, thanks, so now we're sure this is a bug in the proprietary NVIdia driver. If the text problem is still occurring with the new proprietary driver, you may want to report a new bug about that. It's best to go directly to NVidia's bug tracker since Ubuntu developers don't have access to the source

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 381981] Re: Some icons and text disappear in OpenOffice (fixed upstream)

2009-06-01 Thread Milan
Again, please be a little more constructive. If you want to help us making Ubuntu better, you have to understand that this kind of remark won't get your problem fixed. Providing detailed information in well- formed sentences will always give the developers more will to help you than random complain

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 381981] Re: Some icons and text disappear in OpenOffice

2009-05-31 Thread Milan
** Summary changed: - Openoffice loses some icons and text under certain themes in Ubuntu 9.04 + Some icons and text disappear in OpenOffice ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-180 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Attachment added: "Screenshot of the problem with Save/Discard chan

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 381981] Re: Openoffice loses some icons and text under certain themes in Ubuntu 9.04

2009-05-31 Thread Milan
Installing drivers directly from NVidia is not the recommended way, though it can help. Do you confirm the bug has completely disappeared with the version 180.51 of the driver? So I'm opening a task against that package, as OpenOffice. org has nothing to do with it. ** Also affects: nvidia-graphic

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 365994] Re: [i915] X freeze due to end of aperture kernel issue

2009-05-29 Thread Milan
Sorry if the new bug is different form the old one, but I'm not able to read these dumps. About the patches: the commit you refer to above is the same as https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=2580613f4c435ebf2a7c150ffa714f3b23b8e4e8cb42f which you cited before, but with a different sign

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 365994] Re: [i915] Freeze every day or two

2009-05-27 Thread Milan
Good to know I'm not alone! Reverting to old drivers is a good option since the bug is new in Jaunty. But for the future improvements, we really need to get tis fixed. I advise you to subscribe to the upstream bug, they may need more information, and showing we are several people affected by this

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 376092] Re: [i945] Running Out of Memory with UXA (KMS)

2009-05-24 Thread Milan
I'm experiencing the same "cache grows" issue with driver 2.7.99 and kernels 2.6.30, but a i915 card. So the problematic code must be common. It took me some time to figure that was not a kernel issue, but a video driver one. I can confirm caches take about half of my 500 MB of RAM, arent' dropped

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 254468] Re: MASTER: momentary video garbage upon drawing new objects (particularly in KDE)

2009-05-24 Thread Milan
Could a developer explain what the exact status of this bug is supposed to be in Jaunty? Since it's been marked as fixed, people have reported rather contradictory results: should they file separate bugs on a per- driver basis? Myself I'm able to experience it with Intel i915, driver 2.7.1, EXA. I

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 365994] Re: [i915] Freeze every day or two

2009-05-21 Thread Milan
** Attachment added: "Third dump, very close to the first one" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27031541/dri_debug.tgz -- [i915] Freeze every day or two https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365994 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is the registrant for xf8

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 365994] Re: [i915] Freeze every day or two

2009-05-21 Thread Milan
So bad! I've experienced another freeze, and while the symptoms are a little different (no moving mouse cursor this time), the kernel trace is the very same as in the first dump: [ 1320.512119] Call Trace: [ 1320.512137] [] ? rb_erase+0xbe/0x130 [ 1320.512150] [] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xa4/0x10

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 365994] Re: [i915] Freeze every day or two

2009-05-21 Thread Milan
OK, that seems to be fixed with kernel 2.6.30rc6. So that must be the above cited patch. Thanks! (There are new bugs with KMS in that version, though... :-p ) -- [i915] Freeze every day or two https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365994 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 354940] Re: [i915] UXA is very slow (UXA bug)

2009-05-20 Thread Milan
With driver 2:2.7.99.1+git20090519.09beee37-0ubuntu0sarvatt~jaunty, ppracer reports a rough average of 26 FPS, usually ranging between 22 and 30. So that's reasonable, seems there have been a good progress. Not sure we can close the bug, anyway it will be difficult to determine what the normal resu

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 365994] Re: [i915] Freeze every day or two

2009-05-17 Thread Milan
OK, OK, I remove it! ;-) Though I'm not sure we can characterize it better for now since we need to read the new batchbuffer dump to be sure. ** Summary changed: - [i915] Random freeze every day or two + [i915] Freeze every day or two -- [i915] Freeze every day or two https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 365994] Re: [i915] Random freeze every day or two

2009-05-16 Thread Milan
Sorry, the summary about 2.7.1 was not updated by me, and it was a little early to change it before confirmation... And "random" at least makes explicit that we don't have found a precise case that triggers it. About the kernel patch: do you know whether it's supposed to be included in one of the

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 365994] Re: [i915] Random freeze every day or two (needs intel 2.7.1)

2009-05-16 Thread Milan
The more bugs I can catch, the better, now that I know how to do and that I'm using 2.6.30... ;-) Here's a new dump, but diff says it's quite different from the previous one. So it may well be a different issue. I'll let upstream determine that. ** Attachment added: "New batch buffer dump" htt

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 354940] Re: [i915] UXA is very slow (UXA bug)

2009-05-15 Thread Milan
...and still here with KMS enabled (kernel 2.6.30rc5). -- [i915] UXA is very slow (UXA bug) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354940 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in ubuntu. _

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 365994] Re: [i915] Random freeze every day or two (needs intel 2.7.1)

2009-05-14 Thread Milan
The new version does not fix the freeze, sadly. Pretty annoying... :-( -- [i915] Random freeze every day or two (needs intel 2.7.1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365994 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is the registrant for xf86-video-intel. __

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 354940] Re: [i915] UXA is very slow (UXA bug)

2009-05-13 Thread Milan
Still here with driver 2.7.1. -- [i915] UXA is very slow (UXA bug) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354940 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in ubuntu. ___ Mailing li

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 354940] Re: [i915] UXA is very slow (UXA bug)

2009-05-08 Thread Milan
I've tested performances with ppracer: EXA: 25-34 FPS - average: 31 UXA: 14-22 FPS - average: 20 So there's obviously a problem! About benchmarking: I worked hard to get these simple figures because the '-a' option of ppracer, that is said to enable benchmarking, raises an error. I guess you'd