Khem == Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
The code nicely checks for it, but then ends up hard coding the
syscall to use __NR_pread64 afterwards, rendering the check
useless. Fix it by using the result of the test instead.
Mike i think you should look at all the pread/pwrite
On Tuesday 15 October 2013 16:37:32 Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Mike your e-mail client still sucks btw
Sorry, in what way?
the quoting style unreasonably mangles things
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Mike == Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes:
Hi,
On Tuesday 15 October 2013 16:37:32 Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Mike your e-mail client still sucks btw
Sorry, in what way?
the quoting style unreasonably mangles things
The supercite 'name' thing? I kind of like it, but I've turned it
Peter == Peter Korsgaard pe...@korsgaard.com writes:
Peter Some archs (avr32 in particular) still doesn't define __NR_pread64, so
Peter we should fall back to __NR_pread if it isn't available.
Peter The code nicely checks for it, but then ends up hard coding the syscall
Peter to use
Peter == Peter Korsgaard pe...@korsgaard.com writes:
Hi,
Peter Some archs (avr32 in particular) still doesn't define __NR_pread64, so
Peter we should fall back to __NR_pread if it isn't available.
Peter The code nicely checks for it, but then ends up hard coding the syscall
Peter to use
On Friday 04 October 2013 17:45:20 Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Peter == Peter Korsgaard pe...@korsgaard.com writes:
Peter Some archs (avr32 in particular) still doesn't define __NR_pread64,
so Peter we should fall back to __NR_pread if it isn't available.
Peter The code nicely checks for it,
On Friday 04 October 2013 15:41:20 Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Some archs (avr32 in particular) still doesn't define __NR_pread64, so
we should fall back to __NR_pread if it isn't available.
The code nicely checks for it, but then ends up hard coding the syscall
to use __NR_pread64 afterwards,
Mike == Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes:
Hi,
I noticed another critical issue on ARM EABI. The use of
__LONG_LONG_PAIR for the offset doesn't take alignment requirement of
64bit parameters on EABI into consideration, so the offset is off by one
register :/
Mike == Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes:
Hi,
The code nicely checks for it, but then ends up hard coding the syscall
to use __NR_pread64 afterwards, rendering the check useless. Fix it by
using the result of the test instead.
Mike i think you should look at all the pread/pwrite
On Oct 15, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Peter Korsgaard pe...@korsgaard.com wrote:
Mike == Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes:
Hi,
The code nicely checks for it, but then ends up hard coding the syscall
to use __NR_pread64 afterwards, rendering the check useless. Fix it by
using the result of
On Tuesday 15 October 2013 19:04:12 Khem Raj wrote:
On Oct 15, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Peter Korsgaard pe...@korsgaard.com wrote:
Mike == Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes:
Hi,
The code nicely checks for it, but then ends up hard coding the syscall
to use __NR_pread64 afterwards,
Some archs (avr32 in particular) still doesn't define __NR_pread64, so
we should fall back to __NR_pread if it isn't available.
The code nicely checks for it, but then ends up hard coding the syscall
to use __NR_pread64 afterwards, rendering the check useless. Fix it by
using the result of the
Peter == Peter Korsgaard pe...@korsgaard.com writes:
Hi,
Peter Some archs (avr32 in particular) still doesn't define __NR_pread64, so
Peter we should fall back to __NR_pread if it isn't available.
Peter The code nicely checks for it, but then ends up hard coding the syscall
Peter to use
13 matches
Mail list logo
