On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 11:07:46PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Sunday 02 November 2008 11:59, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 12:42:58AM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
P.S. our resolver
On Sunday 02 November 2008 16:07:46 Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Sunday 02 November 2008 11:59, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 12:42:58AM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
P.S. our resolver is scary. Locking is busted.
I fear handling of IPv6 DNS replies are busted too.
I applied some simpler fixes for these bugs, but here is
the big one which is largish. I can use an additional pair
of eyes here.
Please review attached patch and apply if it looks ok.
I found a buglet myself (wasn't supplying an aughmented name
with search domain appended). Fixed in
On Friday 06 June 2008 15:43, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 03:25:30PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
You mean ifenslave applet in busybox?
/me nods vda
Shrank it a bit.
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: vda
Date: 2008-06-06 00:25:12 -0700 (Fri, 06 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 22244
Log:
Use more natural way to return a value in __read_etc_hosts_r:
- if (buflen sizeof(char *)*(ALIAS_DIM))
+ if (buflen sizeof(char *)*ALIAS_DIM)
return
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: vda
Date: 2008-06-06 00:25:12 -0700 (Fri, 06 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 22244
Log:
Use more natural way to return a value in __read_etc_hosts_r:
-if (buflen sizeof(char *)*(ALIAS_DIM))
+if (buflen sizeof(char
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 12:49:33PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: vda
Date: 2008-06-06 00:25:12 -0700 (Fri, 06 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 22244
Log:
Use more natural way to return a value in __read_etc_hosts_r:
hah. vda bashing!
On Friday 06 June 2008 15:02, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 12:49:33PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: vda
Date: 2008-06-06 00:25:12 -0700 (Fri, 06 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 22244
Log:
Use more natural way to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remove superfluous attribute_hidden from function
definition. I seems to produce spurious warning:
libc/inet/resolv.c:1549: warning: 'visibility' attribute ignored on non-class
types
(seems like gcc bug)
-FILE * attribute_hidden __open_etc_hosts(void)
+FILE *
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
PS:
You know that i usually do not blindly rewrite stuff, but the resolver
code is really an ugly and bloated mess (and doesn't even work for
IPv6-only), but this time i think it would be saner to write this thing
from scratch and not try to beat it into shape.
Surely
On Friday 06 June 2008 15:31, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remove superfluous attribute_hidden from function
definition. I seems to produce spurious warning:
libc/inet/resolv.c:1549: warning: 'visibility' attribute ignored on
non-class types
(seems like gcc bug)
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 04:27:25PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Possibly. I tried
FILE * __open_etc_hosts(void) attribute_hidden { ...
- that didn't work at all. So I decided to just take advantage
of the fact that we already have extern decl with attribute_hidden
at the beginning of this
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
Author: vda
Date: 2008-06-06 00:25:12 -0700 (Fri, 06 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 22244
Log:
Use more natural way to return a value in __read_etc_hosts_r:
hah. vda bashing! ;) No, serious:
The proper term is patch review. I've gone through the last 200
checkins
13 matches
Mail list logo
