Hi
I am looking around to find a version of uClinux for the AT91SAM7X
processor. So far without success. Is anyone aware of a development in
progress for this uP - or for a close relative of it?
If your answer is no - then which version of uClinux would you recommend
to port it to the
Hi
I am looking into the question: How many resources (flash and RAM) are
required to run a (typical) uClinux-system? At some places I read, that
each piece of software that is part of (uC)linux is loaded from disk,
decompressed and executed in RAM. On the other hand: From my previous
---
user/samba/Makefile |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/user/samba/Makefile b/user/samba/Makefile
index 39f9416..b2d7708 100644
--- a/user/samba/Makefile
+++ b/user/samba/Makefile
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+FLTFLAGS = -s 0x8000
+
all:
$(MAKE) -C source
Hi all,
I'm developing a custom board based on STR710 (arm7tdmi). Until now, I
used a ST bootloader and the zimage.bin, which was self-decompressing and
booting.
However ,I need a faster boot time, so I was thinking about using
image.bin (the uncompressed one). The problem raises when I
Robin Getz wrote:
Can someone clarify which uClinux ports are currently supported in the
mainline?
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=tree;f=arch;hb=HEAD
Ones that I am aware : arm, blackfin, frv, m68knommu, sh
Really? The last thing I read on this
Robin Getz wrote:
What modern no-mmu architecture would you recommend as a safe bet
for someone getting started in uClinux?
Depends on if you are looking for a soft or hard core.
I would prefer a hard core, but I can't find a microcontroller (Blackfin,
ColdFire, etc.) with the exact
I'm less and less inclined to choose Lattice ...
The Actel device plus ARM Cortex-M1 plus uClinux would be a nice solution.
CodeSourcery claim support, but I haven't tried it yet.
Agreed with you. I once did uclinux kernel port fro mico32 (for
educational purpose), before Lattice come up
Michael Schnell wrote:
Some architectures can do execute in place (XIP), some can't. (I did not
yet find out the exact reasons.)
RAM usually is a lot faster than Flash, so XIP might be not desirable.
However, XIP is possible in RAM too. If RAM is fast but you don't
have a lot of it, or if
I would prefer a hard core, but I can't find a microcontroller (Blackfin,
ColdFire, etc.) with the exact peripheral set I need.
Hence I'm considering FPGA's, specifically the non-volatile kind.
That means Lattice with the MICO32 or Actel with the ARM Cortex-M1.
Why do you want an FPGA with
I would prefer a hard core, but I can't find a microcontroller (Blackfin,
ColdFire, etc.) with the exact peripheral set I need.
Hence I'm considering FPGA's, specifically the non-volatile kind.
That means Lattice with the MICO32 or Actel with the ARM Cortex-M1.
Why do you want an FPGA with
Am Montag, den 14.04.2008, 16:16 +0200 schrieb Michael Schnell:
Some architectures can do execute in place (XIP), some can't. (I did not
yet find out the exact reasons.)
RAM usually is a lot faster than Flash, so XIP might be not desirable.
-Michael
XIP isn't necessarily for flash only.
The samba makefile does:
CONFOPTS = ... --with-privatedir=/etc/config --with-configdir=/etc/config ...
Which means smb.conf should be installed into /etc/config.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
user/samba/Makefile |6 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5
Robin Getz wrote:
On Fri 11 Apr 2008 15:30, Ben Kinsella pondered:
Lattice have said
(http://www.latticesemi.com/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=709threadid=10996forumid=144)
that their lm32-nommu port is unlikely to be integrated into the mainline
kernel.
This makes me nervous about
Hi Jamie,
Jamie Lokier wrote:
Robin Getz wrote:
Can someone clarify which uClinux ports are currently supported in the
mainline?
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=tree;f=arch;hb=HEAD
Ones that I am aware : arm, blackfin, frv, m68knommu, sh
Really? The
14 matches
Mail list logo
