Re: [uClinux-dev] uClinux-dist-test-20080612 released

2008-06-23 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Peter, Peter Turczak wrote: first of all thanks for this nice release. Most of the annoying bugs of the last official release are gone, like the problems of incremental builds of busybox, and some kernel flaws. Thanks for the feedback. During experimentation with the truckload of new fea

Re: [uClinux-dev] mkfifo and syslogd in busybox

2008-06-23 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Michael, Michael Schnell wrote: Silly me did not look hard enough: mkfifo is created in /usr/bin and syslogd is created in /sbin (even though an inittab is created that tries to start syslogd in /bin. What target are you building for? The setup of that inittab entry is most likely the

RE: [uClinux-dev] MCF5373 or MCF5329

2008-06-23 Thread Martin Euredjian
What part of it is painful? I've been working with the 5373 eval board. They didn't put enough FLASH on it to boot uClinux that way, so you are limited to doing so from SDRAM...which is OK, I guess, but not ideal. -Martin _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behal

Re: [uClinux-dev] MCF5373 or MCF5329

2008-06-23 Thread Chris Cosby
We're working with the 5329 right now. It's painful, but it does seem to work. If you decide to go that route, the best option is actually Freescale's LTIB, as they've added some patches that aren't in the uClinux tree, especially as pertains to the USB stuffs. My current environment is uClinux 200

[uClinux-dev] MCF5373 or MCF5329

2008-06-23 Thread Martin Euredjian
Sorry, that's 5373 or 5329 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Euredjian Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 10:25 AM To: 'uClinux development list' Subject: [uClinux-dev] MCF5373 or MCF5323 Which of the above processors is the path to least

[uClinux-dev] MCF5373 or MCF5323

2008-06-23 Thread Martin Euredjian
Which of the above processors is the path to least resistance in bringing up uClinux? I am working on a new design and don't have lots of time to chase after missing bits. My research seems to indicate that there's better support for the '5272 part. True? I suppose I could open-up the field and

Re: [uClinux-dev] mkfifo and syslogd in busybox

2008-06-23 Thread Michael Schnell
Silly me did not look hard enough: mkfifo is created in /usr/bin and syslogd is created in /sbin (even though an inittab is created that tries to start syslogd in /bin. -Michael ___ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uc

[uClinux-dev] mkfifo and syslogd in busybox

2008-06-23 Thread Michael Schnell
I tried to activate either and/or both of mkfifo and syslogd in the busybox that comes with the uClinux-dist. In all cases I don't see an error message, but no appropriate link is create and if I create it manually, the applet is not not in place in the busybox executable. I also tried to activa