Hello!
When build the "e2fsprogs" of uClinux-dist-20080808, i have met some errors,
3 files were changed to fix them:
* user/e2fsprogs/misc/logsave.c -> all "fork" should be
changed as "vfork"
* e2fsprogs/makefile > link problem in the
romfs directo
On Monday 20 October 2008, Arthur Wong wrote:
> --- user/e2fsprogs.bak/configure2008-10-20 17:32:45.0 +0800
> +++ user/e2fsprogs/configure2008-10-20 17:44:57.0 +0800
> @@ -3076,7 +3076,7 @@ if test "${with_ldopts+set}" = set; then
> echo "${ECHO_T}LDFLAGS is $withval" >&6
>
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > @@ -237,9 +237,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > send_output("\n", 0, send_flag);
> >
> > if (outbuf) {
> > -pid = fork();
> > +pid = vfork();
> > if (pid < 0) {
> > -perror("fork");
> > +per
On Monday 20 October 2008 19:23, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > @@ -237,9 +237,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > > send_output("\n", 0, send_flag);
> > >
> > > if (outbuf) {
> > > -pid = fork();
> > > +pid = vfork();
> > >
See question below.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:39:46AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 20 October 2008, Arthur Wong wrote:
> > --- user/e2fsprogs.bak/configure2008-10-20 17:32:45.0 +0800
> > +++ user/e2fsprogs/configure2008-10-20 17:44:57.0 +0800
> > @@ -3076,7 +3
Jivin Jun Sun lays it down ...
>
> See question below.
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:39:46AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 20 October 2008, Arthur Wong wrote:
> > > --- user/e2fsprogs.bak/configure2008-10-20 17:32:45.0 +0800
> > > +++ user/e2fsprogs/configure2008-10
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:49:54AM +1000, David McCullough wrote:
>
> Jivin Jun Sun lays it down ...
> >
> > See question below.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:39:46AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Monday 20 October 2008, Arthur Wong wrote:
> > > > --- user/e2fsprogs.bak/configure
Jivin Jun Sun lays it down ...
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:49:54AM +1000, David McCullough wrote:
> >
> > Jivin Jun Sun lays it down ...
> > >
> > > See question below.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:39:46AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Monday 20 October 2008, Arthur Wong wr
2008/10/20 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Monday 20 October 2008, Arthur Wong wrote:
> > --- user/e2fsprogs.bak/configure2008-10-20 17:32:45.0 +0800
> > +++ user/e2fsprogs/configure2008-10-20 17:44:57.0 +0800
> > @@ -3076,7 +3076,7 @@ if test "${with_ldopts+set}" =
On Monday 20 October 2008, Arthur Wong wrote:
> 2008/10/20 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Monday 20 October 2008, Arthur Wong wrote:
> > > --- user/e2fsprogs.bak/configure2008-10-20 17:32:45.0 +0800
> > > +++ user/e2fsprogs/configure2008-10-20 17:44:57.0 +0800
> >
On Monday 20 October 2008, Chris Gray wrote:
> On Monday 20 October 2008 19:23, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > @@ -237,9 +237,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > > > send_output("\n", 0, send_flag);
> > > >
> > > > if (outbuf) {
> > > > -
On Monday 20 October 2008, David McCullough wrote:
> Jivin Jun Sun lays it down ...
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:49:54AM +1000, David McCullough wrote:
> > > Jivin Jun Sun lays it down ...
> > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:39:46AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > > On Monday 20 October 2008,
Jivin Mike Frysinger lays it down ...
> On Monday 20 October 2008, David McCullough wrote:
> > Jivin Jun Sun lays it down ...
> > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:49:54AM +1000, David McCullough wrote:
> > > > Jivin Jun Sun lays it down ...
> > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:39:46AM -0400, Mike Frys
uClinux is just "linux" with some extras, nothing is taken out, so you
are just using a regular linux kernel :-)
So the general paradigm has change once more (or less) than I was aware of.
Originally the was "Microcontroller Linux" later it was "MMU-less Linux"
and now it's "Linux for Fir
it doesn't matter whether you are ELF/flat/fdpic
Why is flat used for _some_ architectures and not for others ?
What are the advantages of flat over ELF and vice versa ?
(In fact I don't know exactly what "flat" means ;) )
-Michael
___
uClinux-dev m
Jivin Michael Schnell lays it down ...
>
> >uClinux is just "linux" with some extras, nothing is taken out, so you
> >are just using a regular linux kernel :-)
>
> So the general paradigm has change once more (or less) than I was aware of.
>
> Originally the was "Microcontroller Linux" later it
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 20 October 2008, Chris Gray wrote:
> > On Monday 20 October 2008 19:23, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > > @@ -237,9 +237,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > > > > send_output("\n", 0, send_flag);
> > > > >
> > > > >
On Tuesday 21 October 2008, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Btw, in most cases exit() should not be called in a *fork* child
> either, let alone *vfork*. It will flush stdio buffers - and they may
> get flushed by the parent when it exits too. Same for atexit()
> handlers.
>
> Often if there's an exit() in
Hi Michael,
Michael Schnell wrote:
it doesn't matter whether you are ELF/flat/fdpic
Why is flat used for _some_ architectures and not for others ?
What are the advantages of flat over ELF and vice versa ?
(In fact I don't know exactly what "flat" means ;) )
FLAT format was the first native ex
Thanks tor these answers !
-Michael
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/op
Thanks a lot !
I should take a look at the great blackfin docs more often !
-Michael
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsub
On Tuesday 21 October 2008, Michael Schnell wrote:
> > it doesn't matter whether you are ELF/flat/fdpic
>
> Why is flat used for _some_ architectures and not for others ?
it depends on the arch as to whether it is the only choice.
> What are the advantages of flat over ELF and vice versa ?
resou
Thanks for the wonderful discussion.
I know little about Blackfin before that, so my understanding is:
* with Blackfin, both FLAT and FDPIC ELF were supported;
* with ARM (no-mmu), still only support FLAT
Is it right ?
2008/10/22 Michael Schnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thanks a lot !
> I should
Hi Arthur,
Arthur Wong wrote:
Thanks for the wonderful discussion.
I know little about Blackfin before that, so my understanding is:
* with Blackfin, both FLAT and FDPIC ELF were supported;
* with ARM (no-mmu), still only support FLAT
Is it right ?
That is certainly correct at the moment.
24 matches
Mail list logo
