RE: ugnet_: Acholi clergy defends fr. Rodriguez

2004-05-16 Thread emmanuel musaazi
haracterize my immediate former posting as "verbiage" but you will accept that it is factual verbiage. Cheers. From: Vukoni Lupa-Lasaga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ugnet_: Acholi clergy defends fr. Rodriguez Date: Sat, 15 May 2004

RE: ugnet_: Acholi clergy defends fr. Rodriguez

2004-05-15 Thread Vukoni Lupa-Lasaga
Bwana Musaazi, Once again, with so much verbiage you have deftly sidestepped the real issues. But I'll revisit them anyway. 1. The government of Uganda has the responsibility of protecting the property and lives of all Ugandans from both internal and external threats. By commission and omission

RE: ugnet_: Acholi clergy defends fr. Rodriguez

2004-05-14 Thread emmanuel musaazi
ense? Vukoni common sense will tell you that, that is unlawful behaviour. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ugnet_: Acholi clergy defends fr. Rodriguez Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 15:04:29 -0700> _

RE: ugnet_: Acholi clergy defends fr. Rodriguez

2004-05-13 Thread vukoni
My dear Musaazi,   Obviously, you need to re-read carefully your earlier contributions on this topic.  They're dripping with innuendos and inferences about who you think is really to blame for the war that has made Acholiland and its immediate neighborhood a living hell for all its inhabitants  and

RE: ugnet_: Acholi clergy defends fr. Rodriguez

2004-05-13 Thread emmanuel musaazi
illing, maiming, destruction, raping and enslavement of innocent people in the north of Uganda. Spin it all you want, but unfortunately for you and your ilk, facts don't lie. facts are facts. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ugnet_: Acholi clergy d

RE: ugnet_: Acholi clergy defends fr. Rodriguez

2004-05-13 Thread vukoni
ot to critisize him in fear that it will offend the LRA.>From: Vukoni Lupa-Lasaga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: RE: ugnet_: Acholi clergy defends fr. Rodriguez>Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 00:01:53 -0500>>Dear Musaazi,>>To illus

RE: ugnet_: Acholi clergy defends fr. Rodriguez

2004-05-12 Thread emmanuel musaazi
LRA. From: Vukoni Lupa-Lasaga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ugnet_: Acholi clergy defends fr. Rodriguez Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 00:01:53 -0500 Dear Musaazi, To illustrate a point that's best driven home anecdotally, I was going to t

RE: ugnet_: Acholi clergy defends fr. Rodriguez

2004-05-11 Thread Vukoni Lupa-Lasaga
Dear Musaazi, To illustrate a point that's best driven home anecdotally, I was going to tell netters a story about a tragic event that happened in 1981 in my neck of the woods. But it occurred to me that I could simply redact your small polemic to good effect. My insertions are in brackets. "

RE: ugnet_: Acholi clergy defends fr. Rodriguez

2004-05-11 Thread emmanuel musaazi
hmm if father Rodriguez is not a part of the LRA (or at least a sympathizer), then why is ARLPI afraid that critisizing him will "could frustrate and damage the whole peace process currently in place,". If it is okay to accuse the government of not adequately protecting people in IDPCs, why