Does anyone _not_ offer that?
Andy
g to be changing any list settings.
mailop might be a better venue to talk more about whether Internet
mailing lists in general are required to support DKIM.
https://www.mailop.org/
Though I think the view will still mostly only go as far as
"invalidating DKIM will negatively affect deliverability, so if you
care about that…"
Thanks,
Andy
--- End Message ---
asking on the basis of it being obvious to you, but it's
not obvious. Nevertheless it's a decision to make for mailing lists
in the DKIM and DMARC era.
Personally I'd replace mailing lists with Discourse and the problem
is gone.
Thanks,
Andy
¹ I appreciate that some readers may n
at you particularly do not like? If so then the other
option would be to just change the from address (and not attach
original email), but that loses some information from your original
email.
You could stop using DMARC yourself. 😀
Thanks,
Andy
--- End Message ---
Hi there, if there is anyone from EE lurking on here, can they please drop me a
line as I am in a world of pain with a new EE FTTP Installation, and cant get
past the Early Life team to someone who can actually help…..
Cheers
Andy (tethered and hating it)
Kind Regards
Andy
[https
can do 10s of
Mpps on a pc router (see Pim from IPng’s presentation
https://www.swinog.ch/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Pim-van-Pelt-IPng-Networks-Evolution-of-DPDK-Controlplanes.pdf
)
Andy
From: uknof on behalf of John P Bourke
Date: Wednesday, 28 June 2023 at 21:25
To: Tim Bray , uknof
On 28 Jul 2021, at 08:22, Jody Botham wrote:
> if you don't need a lot of functionality and just need an IGP + BGP +
> throughput then that potentially opens the door to other vendors outside of
> Juniper and Cisco e.g. Arista. If you want a mature MPLS stack then I'd take
> Arista back off t
the MX204-R and MX10003
devices
Can anyone give a full difference between the MX204, MX204-IR and MX204-R, am I
correct in assuming the MX204-R is the router with no restrictions.
Cheers
Andy
From: Catalin Dominte
Date: Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 17:22
To: Charl Tintinger , Andy Hunter
Cc
.
Thanks in advance
Andy
Andy Hunter
Technical Director
IT Professional Services
Unit 2A & Unit 2B
Waterside Drive
Metrocentre East Business Park
Gateshead
Tyne & Wear
NE11 9HU
T. 0191 442 8300
F. 0191 442 8301
[https://www.itps.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/esig/itps-20years-esig-footer.jpg]
Protect - Information able to be shared outside of ITPS
I have the MSO and our AM has just advised that this is ongoing – also now
getting news of it from the Chronicle.
Strap in ☹
Kind Regards
Andy
From: uknof
Date: Thursday, 23 July 2020 at 13:21
To: Dan Kitchen , uknof
Subject: Re
Protect - Information able to be shared outside of ITPS
Hi Dan
Fire in BT Newcastle Exchange – Emergency Services onsite now.
Kind Regards
Andy
Advanced Notice of Annual Leave – 10th August – 21st August
andy.hun...@itps.co.uk (andy.hun...@itps.co.uk)
From: uknof
Date: Thursday, 23
Protect - Information able to be shared outside of ITPS
Hi Wojciech
As previously asked have you tried UDP as this could be a bandwidth delay
product problem with the latency limiting the TCP Sliding Window.
Cheers
Andy
Kind Regards
Andy
From: uknof on
+1 for Bogons – Give Brandon a call – really helpful and reliable.
Andy
From: uknof
Date: Wednesday, 6 May 2020 at 14:01
To: glen watts
Cc: uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk
Subject: Re: [uknof] London Dark Fibre
On 2020/05/06 11:19, glen watts wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm looking for some
ement on this sort of
thing) but if you are forced to then maybe ask for a new payment
address as now all of uknof can tell whether you paid. :)
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/14XUpNzEPYWVhsXmG3A15wC5Ffirxuk7dB
Cheers,
Andy
gt;i...@csirt.ja.net and have again heard nothing.
>
> That surprises me. There are definitely CSIRT folk on this list, but I'll
> forward internally as well (though their approach will just be to Plymouth).
Thanks, someone from csirt.ja.net did just follow up to my report
from 4 December.
Cheers,
Andy
top it happening
from your network, please do get in touch off-list and I'll send you
samples of their output.
Cheers,
Andy
--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
companies like IP-Echelon join the tracker and passively get a list
of every IP address seen to be participating. The thing is, I also
understand that some trackers inject a certain percentage of
completely random IPs in order to frustrate companies like
IP-Echelon…
Cheers,
Andy
On Fri, Jun 07, 201
ommunicate with.
Cheers,
Andy
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 02:07:50PM +, Peter Knapp wrote:
> Love to know what firewall you're using that guarantees you can't get any
> form of BT through it please?
>
> Pete
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: uknof [mailto
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 05:38:10PM +0400, Stephen Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 17:25, Andy Smith wrote:
> > However, one day they sent one that implicated one of our
> > infrastructure hosts and I could not see any way in which that could
> > be torrenting
iscovering that the reports could be wrong and there
was no way to query them, we started binning them with no action.
Cheers,
Andy
--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
dam,
Andy
Hi,
Catalin Dominte wrote:
> since they [EE] deployed IPv6 in their network (which I think it’s good) I
> cannot reach certain destinations that are running on IPv4, because
> they go via IPv6 by default.
Have you been able to troubleshoot this more? I thought, based on what I
learned in rel
e RPKI adoption.
Best wishes,
Andy
f you would like any other culinary advice.
Andy D
Virtual Firewalls all the way.
We use NSX.
Cheers
Andy
From: uknof on behalf of Paul Bone
Date: Friday, 2 June 2017 at 14:20
To: "uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk"
Subject: [uknof] Hosting Firewall Advice
HI All,
We currently run hosting of various Windows and Linux virtual serve
if you agree that not updating a
canary is a disclosure then Section 19 (1) of that act trumps any
contractual clause you could construct:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/28/section/19
I haven't sought advice on same for IP Bill but I would be surprised
if it isn't similar.
Cheers,
Andy
until someone gets some proper
advice that they can share, and then maybe still not until it gets
tested in court.
And I can't afford that.
Cheers,
Andy
nk of
ipv4salvation.com, sent to RIPE DB contacts via SendGrid. SendGrid
repsonded to an abuse report within about 10 minutes saying they had
suspended the account, though I imagine it will be no problem for
"Jon Blank" to sign up again of course.
Cheers,
Andy
We have three interconnects to kit into TFM10 at THN and we saw two of
them go down at 07:43 this morning - Telehouse Docklands Ops have
confirmed that they are experiencing power issues and are investigating.
Doesn't appear to be the whole of TFM10 affected.
Regards,
Andy Hicks
-Ori
Yeah – I think this caused a massive Thunderstorm on Tyneside as well. There
was lightning as well….
Or the two may be completely unlinked..
Andy
On 20/07/2016, 13:42, "uknof on behalf of Adrian Farrel"
wrote:
Any news on today's BT outage?
My ISP is heartily blami
ir assessments
("the DoS ate my homework"...), but sadly such things are not
inconceivable these days.
Keith
--
Christian de Larrinaga FBCS, CITP,
-
@ FirstHand
-
+44 7989 386778
c...@firsthand.net<mailto:c...@firsthand.net>
-
y if you are doing soft-reconfiguration inbound
(“Keep all” in Juniper dialect). Can turn that off if you support route
refresh.
Andy
Hope you can all make it.
Best wishes,
Andy
Hi,
Charl wrote:
> If for example I was being charged £50K a year for a service from
> AN Other provider for 1Gig (example, sub 40kms) and I had the option
> to get a service from them that was unlit and unmanaged, what would
> I expect to pay?
The competitiveness of the route (amount of demand a
rger scale BT wholesale (nationwide) outage as hit some of our
customer-base also, unsure of details at present but BT have opened an
incident "IMT38929/14"
Regards,
--
Andy
e: andy@thebrowns.email
e: andy @ thebmwz3.co.uk
e: andy @ broadcast-tech.co.uk
w: http://www.thebmwz3.co.uk
w:
make the same comment about frustrated users because of NAT44, which
is now the only way forward for all of the subscribers to service providers
which don’t have a v6 plan by now.
“
Andy
recreational contraryism. :-)
Andy
On 4 Sep 2014, at 23:03, Neil J. McRae wrote:
> sorry Andy but that's complete rubbish!
>
> NAT44 has been a requirement since the very notion of IPV6.
That’s both correct and nothing to do with what I said, I was talking about the
relative frustrations of having a broken con
On 4 Sep 2014, at 15:17, Neil J. McRae wrote:
> Also I see IPV6 frustrating users where its been rolled out before it was
> ready which is something that's very bad.
One could make the same comment about frustrated users because of NAT44, which
is now the only way forward for all of the subs
creation/updating, updating of central IPAM, chooseing the next free RDs and
> RTs etc.
.. In which case you should definitely take a gander at the suite of tools for
this purpose at http://www.6connect.com
Andy x
ion is quite
interconnection focussed because it was especially written for
peer2.org<http://peer2.org> last week in the US, but you will get the idea.
So, why do you ask ?
Andy
oftware versions are a known good set
because its very very beta at this stage. It has a render url api that will
let you integrate the data into your applications. You are going to need to
secure it so that customers can't render each others' data.
I love graphs.
Andy
ng content out of
racks in region and populating/feeding the data cache on smaller links from
your office for example. IOW, run the fatter pipes the shortest distance.
Andy
--
Regards, Andy Davidson
CTO || Allegro Networks UK
www.allegro.net || Connectivity You Control
election criteria I look forward to your membership
application. :-)
Best wishes,
Andy
r all of our
networks become.
Andy
ere is an API (our own
portal uses the API to quote and provision services). Other questions may be
answered on video captured at our demo/launch: http://youtu.be/jmUN4RPGJ6g
Best wishes,
Andy
,
Andy Davidson
ooking for, but certainly worth a thought
if performance is your goal.
Cheers
Andy
support.
andy
routing via your non-customer peers and transit partners does
not mean you can't apply Strict uRPF facing your customers (in fact you
should do so.)
Andy
sn't been touched
for 2 years. The hardware was EOL'd in 2010.
If you still have 7304 at the edge, you are stuck with the ASTRANS/23456
hack, my sympathy :-), and probably a burning desire to upgrade.
Andy
achability issues related to
IPv6 solves the problem for ever.
Users don't need to know what IPv6 is, if we do our job properly. The
challenge (largely solved) is for all this to 'just work', as you comment. CGN
and v4 life extension makes that harder, end-to-end and dual stack makes that
easier.
Andy Davidson
errors
on the customer side.
It works really well for us and we collect the data historically so that
we can trend future results from the same customer.
Andy
*From:*uknof-boun...@lists.uknof.org.uk
[mailto:uknof-boun...@lists.uknof.org.uk] *On Behalf Of *Ben Ward
*Sent:* 05 December 2011 11:05
hosted
probes. Cool. :-)
There is a webcast from the current RIPE meeting about the project later today
at 3pm UK (4pm RIPE meeting local time) - see
http://ripe61.ripe.net/programme/remote-participation/
Andy
tend, please drop me a mail off-list,
and I will reply with full information about the location. Please send
this before 3pm tomorrow (Wednesday).
We'd like to recognise and thank Adrian Kennard for sponsoring this event.
--
Regards, Andy Davidson
NetSumo Limited
T: +44 (0) 20 7993 1700
E: a
55 matches
Mail list logo
