RE: transliterations (was compelling Unicode demo)

2001-11-16 Thread Hietaniemi Jarkko (NRC/Boston)
> > Perhaps some kind of universal soundex is needed... > tex IPA/ASCII? http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Evan_Kirshenbaum/IPA/ Well, probably no. IPA is for people who can precisely transcribe what they hear, the idea of soundex is almost the other way round...

transliterations (was compelling Unicode demo)

2001-11-16 Thread Tex Texin
Lars, It's a good point. Especially since the mapping from one script to another might follow a specific algorithm that a computer can follow, but the user will type in their estimate of the pronounciation which will depend strongly on their dialect and their ear for the sounds used in the search

Re: Compelling Unicode demo

2001-11-16 Thread Lars Marius Garshol
* John Hudson | | Does anyone know how/if Opera 6 handles complex script processing? What it does is basically to hand off the text to the OS, and let it do the processing and display. This works well, except for some issues with text selection, and, of course, bidi. | which could be interpret

RE: Compelling Unicode demo

2001-11-16 Thread John Hudson
At 03:51 11/16/2001, Alan Wood wrote: >There is a beta version of Opera 6 available (http://www.opera.com/), the >first version with Unicode support. It has some problems with the names in >Japanese on Tex's page at: Does anyone know how/if Opera 6 handles complex script processing? The websit

RE: Compelling Unicode demo

2001-11-16 Thread Lars Kristan
I was about to complain about the transliteration 'Mikhail Gorbachev', but then I saw that this was discussed before (I am new to the list) and that it is how English does the transliteration of ë. Still... What I put here is U+00EB (Latin small letter E with diaresis) which looks like U+0451 (Cy

RE: Compelling Unicode demo

2001-11-16 Thread Jonathan Rosenne
Netscape 6.1 does the Hebrew correctly, but I think the Arabic is bad. Jony > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tex Texin > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:51 AM > To: Unicoders > Subject: Re: Compelling Unicode demo > > > The pag

Re: Compelling Unicode demo

2001-11-16 Thread Tex Texin
I would like some Arabic examples for the web page, if someone cares to submit one. There are some new entries this morning. Jonathan Rosenne wrote: > > Netscape 6.1 does the Hebrew correctly, but I think the Arabic is bad. > > Jony > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Compelling Unicode demo

2001-11-16 Thread Alan Wood
There is a beta version of Opera 6 available (http://www.opera.com/), the first version with Unicode support. It has some problems with the names in Japanese on Tex's page at: > http://www.geocities.com/i18nguy/unicode-example.html > Alan Wood Documentation Writer / Web Master Context Limited (

Re: Compelling Unicode demo

2001-11-16 Thread Lars Marius Garshol
* Tex Texin | | I find IE 5.5 displays it well. I use Netscape 4.7 which has trouble | with Hebrew among other things. If you use another browser, I would | be interested in reports on which ones work well. (Don't bother to | tell me which ones don't work.) * Mike Lischke | | Indeed, this looks

Re: romajiToKana function

2001-11-16 Thread Thierry Sourbier
> I have before referred to a "romajiToKana" function, not knowing whether > or not it existed. it seems it does exist. A couple of Perl and C implementation exist. As I never used them I cannot provide futher comment, but you'll find them at: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/culture/japan/info/ htt

RE: Compelling Unicode demo

2001-11-16 Thread Mike Lischke
> I find IE 5.5 displays it well. I use Netscape 4.7 which has > trouble with Hebrew among other things. If you use another > browser, I would be interested in reports on which ones work > well. (Don't bother to tell me which ones don't work.) Indeed, this looks pretty cool. IE 6.0 also displa

Lost messages? (was RE: No proposal of hyphen addition)

2001-11-16 Thread Marco Cimarosti
Michael Everson wrote: > Lloyd, you talked about a "character" [...] I never received the message Michael is replying to, so I guess that this and other messages were lost (probably because of the problem with the Finnish servers). In fact, in the last few days the traffic on the Unicode List wa

Re: Compelling Unicode demo

2001-11-16 Thread Tex Texin
The page has been updated again. It is getting to be pretty cool, thanks to new submissions for Inuktitut, Eritrean, Ethiopean, and others. It also has a link for ICU's online transliteration page. If you have trouble displaying it, there is a link to the Unicode site's helper page. I have to fix