On Wednesday, January 23, 2002, at 09:05 AM, Thomas Chan wrote:
> In other words,
> yao1 'small'TC U+4E48 or U+5E7A -> SC U+4E48
> me (as in shen2me 'what') TC U+9EBC or U+9EBD -> SC U+4E48
> mo2 (as in yao1mo2 'insignificant') TC U+9EBC or U+9EBD -> SC U+9
Hi Eric,
Domain names are a work in progress. Currently they are restricted to a subset of
ASCII. There is a working group within the IETF working on a solution to this which
happens to use Unicode.
As for the rest of a URL, browsers and webservers have long supported non-ASCII URLs
(via %-en
Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language
lists only (filʹ här mänʹ ik).
Best regards,
James Kass.
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Everson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Very-OT] Re: ü
> At
Before investing into an upgrade, I would like to know if someone knows
if Fontlab 4.0 supports supplementary characters (not BMP) in OpenType
fonts.
Other small questions, since I do not know the Mac world, would such a
font also work on Macs (which platformid, same cmap ?)
Patrick
John,
> This is the kind of mess that has discouraged anybody from doing a
> systematic survey of simplifications for the Unihan database.
>
> > The other example (U+8721 kTraditionalVariant U+8721 U+881F) is a
> > mistake--the TraditionalVariant should only be U+881F.
> >
>
> Actually, no. B
A 00:35 2002-01-23 +, Michael Everson a écrit :
>At 18:30 -0500 2002-01-22, Patrick Andries wrote:
>>
>>Obviously (I advocate in French changing the spelling of common foreign
>>words so that there would be more consistency).
>
>Le ouiquende?
That would be pronounced "wikãd"... To respect th
At 12:23 1/23/2002, Patrick Andries wrote:
>Before investing into an upgrade, I would like to know if someone knows if
>Fontlab 4.0 supports supplementary characters (not BMP) in OpenType fonts.
I asked Yuri Yarmola, the FL developer, about this during FL4 beta testing,
and he said it was not
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, John H. Jenkins wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 23, 2002, at 09:05 AM, Thomas Chan wrote:
> > In other words,
> > yao1 'small'TC U+4E48 or U+5E7A -> SC U+4E48
> > me (as in shen2me 'what') TC U+9EBC or U+9EBD -> SC U+4E48
> > mo2 (as in
James Kass wrote:
>Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language
>lists only (filʹ här mänʹ ik).
>
>Best regards,
>
>James Kass.
>
Well, well, I dare say, these rebel dialects will never cease to amaze me.
BTW, are those two a's really identical? My colonial dictionary
(Webster'
On Wednesday, January 23, 2002, at 12:23 PM, Patrick Andries wrote:
> Other small questions, since I do not know the Mac world, would such a
> font also work on Macs (which platformid, same cmap ?)
>
Mac OS X 10.1 and later support non-BMP characters. I believe we support
all of the formats for
> >>Obviously (I advocate in French changing the spelling of common foreign
> >>words so that there would be more consistency).
> >
> >Le ouiquende?
>
> That would be pronounced "wikãd"... To respect the English pronunciation
> you would have to write it "ouiquennde", which would still be a very
Yuri Yarmola wrote to say that he is working on a solution to encoding
supplementary characters in FontLab fonts, but that the initial solution
will not involve the necessary total rewrite of FontLab's internal Unicode
indexing. However, it will be possible to generate 4-byte cmap tables.
John
Yves Arrouye wrote:
>
>France's Académie française is good at that: they recently invented cédérom
>(CD-ROM; gets used because it's quite okay), and mèl (mail, for e-mail;
>nobody uses it except to make fun of it).
>
Mél (which I oppose) was never proposed as a word but as an
abbreviation f
> http://www.culture.fr/culture/dglf/dispositif-enrichissement.htm
> http://www.culture.fr/culture/dglf/dispositif-enrichissement.htm
Thanks for the pointer. Though I can't fine the exact sentence re: the
substantive use I found mél referred to as a symbol for "messagerie
électronique." I like co
Dinesh Agarwal wrote,
> ... Where can I download a Unicode Open Type Font
> that supports Hindi?
>
http://home.att.net/~jameskass/CODE2000.ZIP
OpenType tables for Bengali, Gurmukhi, and Tamil seem to
be complete. Devanagari OpenType is mostly completed but
still needs mark positioning added
In a message dated 2002-01-23 13:32:39 Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language
>> lists only (fil' här män' ik).
>
> BTW, are those two a's really identical?
They are in my dialect, a mixture of Southern California and Great La
To some extent, my problem has been finally solved, though in a bizarre
manner.
On a computer running Microsoft Windows 98 Second Edition 4.10. A and
using Internet Explorer Version 5.50.4522.1800 without support for any extra
language added (i.e., with the standard settings that these thi
John Hudson wrote (way back on 2001-04-15):
>
> Although there has not been any official announcement from Microsoft, and
> no release date, my understanding is that 'generic' shaping is being added
> to Uniscribe. This includes support for diacritic composition using
> OpenType mark
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Rick McGowan wrote:
> You must be talking about the small number of glyphs that don't exist in
> the Mathematical Variants table.
Yes.
> There are several known missing glyphs that should have been noted in the
> cover file for the entire release. The known no
David Hopwood wrote:
> We can *guess* what the column two glyphs look like from the descriptions,
> I suppose, but isn't it kind of important to have images of them?
Heh... Well, yeah, theoretically. We just don't have any glyphs for some
of the things in column 2. The items in column 1 will e
20 matches
Mail list logo