Why are these called "emojis" for mouse buttons rather than just
"characters" for them?
On Tue, 31 Dec, 2019, 18:45 Philippe Verdy via Unicode,
wrote:
> A lot of application need to document their keymap and want to display
> keys.
>
> For now there are emojis for mouses (several variants: 1, 2
i, 27 Dec, 2019, 07:19 Ken Whistler, wrote:
> Shriramana,
>
> On 12/20/2019 6:29 PM, Shriramana Sharma via Unicode wrote:
> > I was looking at the pipeline for something else, and for the first
> > time I see a character category: “not accepted by the UTC but in ISO
> > bal
So I was wondering whether TeX only does this to the ~ input character or
the actual NBSP Unicode character too?
On 12/19/19, James Kass via Unicode wrote:
>
> There's a bug report for the LibreOffice application here...
> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652
> ...which shows an interesting history of the situation.
LOL two years ago almost to the date Shriramana Sha
things first before they can follow. I figured
that if this is discussed and decided here, everyone can fix it at the
same time.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा 𑀰𑁆𑀭𑀻𑀭𑀫𑀡𑀰𑀭𑁆𑀫𑀸
On 12/21/19, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 17:25:17 +0530
> Shriramana Sharma via Unicode wrote:
>
>> I don't expect NBSP to ever disappear, because spaces disappear only
>> at linebreaks, and NBSP simply doesn't stand at linebrea
On 12/21/19, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> 1)
>
> With the existing single NBSP character, provide a software option to
> either make it flexible or inflexible, but this preference should be
> stored as part of the document and not the application settings, else
> shared documents
the existing 2028 and 2029 Line and Paragraph
Separators with the annotation: “may be used to represent this
semantic unambiguously”.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा 𑀰𑁆𑀭𑀻𑀭𑀫𑀡𑀰𑀭𑁆𑀫𑀸
been the
practice to my knowledge to get a character approved by the UTC first.
Anyone throw some light on these particular cases?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा 𑀰𑁆𑀭𑀻𑀭𑀫𑀡𑀰𑀭𑁆𑀫𑀸
On 12/17/19, Asmus Freytag via Unicode wrote:
> On 12/17/2019 2:41 AM, Shriramana Sharma via Unicode wrote:
>>
>> On Tue 17 Dec, 2019, 16:09 QSJN 4 UKR via Unicode,
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> «The no-break space is not the same character as the figure space.
On Tue 17 Dec, 2019, 16:09 QSJN 4 UKR via Unicode,
wrote:
> Agree.
> By the way, it is common practice to use multiple nbsp in a row to
> create a larger span. In my opinion, it is wrong to replace fixed
> width spaces with non-breaking spaces.
> Quote from Microsoft Typography Character design s
0 SP being in line breaking, NBSP should be treated equal to
U+0020 for the purpose of stretching for justified alignment.
Only then can text such as the above be naturally easily formatted.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा 𑀰𑁆𑀭𑀻𑀭𑀫𑀡𑀰𑀭𑁆𑀫𑀸
(from my POV as an Indian) to mainstream
digital devices.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा 𑀰𑁆𑀭𑀻𑀭𑀫𑀡𑀰𑀭𑁆𑀫𑀸
I don't know many modern fonts that display 007C as a broken glyph. In fact
I haven't seen a broken line pipe glyph since the MS-DOS days. Nowadays we
have 00A6 for that.
candrabindu can be used, since there is already
evidence for mixed usage of the scripts and nukta characters have been
encoded for Tamil usage in the Grantha block for this same reason
despite Grantha users objecting to it as unattested! 😉
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श
that
separate characters would help preserving sanity in implementing text
shaping engines or such.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा 𑀰𑁆𑀭𑀻𑀭𑀫𑀡𑀰𑀭𑁆𑀫𑀸
canvas Latin font vendors to include the
Devanagari characters 0964/0965 on a small technicality of character
property.
Is there a particular reason it's *really* necessary to include Latn
in the script extension property of 0964/0965?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमण
On Thu 10 Jan, 2019, 20:49 Arthur Reutenauer via Unicode <
unicode@unicode.org wrote:
>
> On this topic, I was just pointed to
>
> https://twitter.com/kentcdodds/status/1083073242330361856
>
> “You 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 it's 𝒸𝓊𝓉ℯ to 𝘄𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲 your tweets and usernames
> 𝖙𝖍𝖎𝖘 𝖜𝖆𝖞. But
> have you 𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙙 t
Hello. This may be slightly OT for this list but I'm asking it here as it
concerns computer usage with multiple scripts and i18n:
1) Are shortcuts like Ctrl+C changed as per locale? I mean Ctrl+T for
"tout" io Ctrl+A for "all"?
2) How about when the shortcuts are the Alt+ combinations referring t
them always as the actual emoji characters but
sometimes as :coloned-tags: (or what do you call it) but I presume the
GitHub system will convert it to the actual characters before
displaying…
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा 𑀰𑁆𑀭𑀻𑀭𑀫𑀡𑀰𑀭𑁆𑀫𑀸
This is a unique problem because this is probably the only case where the
same script produces conjuncts for one language and not for another. I had
asked for a separate Tamil Brahmi virama to be encoded which would obviate
this problem but that was shot down. Maybe that case should be reopened?
O
On 14-Feb-2018 22:45, "Alastair Houghton"
wrote:
I’d hope that Mark Davis has “UNICODE” on his car. However, I’m not sure
how relevant it really is to this mailing list.
You're right. My apologies. It *is* somewhat OT to the actual purpose of
this list. But I figured if anyone knew the answer
Sorry but "UNICODE" does fit within those rules doesn't it?
On 14-Feb-2018 21:54, "Stephane Bortzmeyer" wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 09:44:06PM +0530,
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode wrote
a message of 6 lines which said:
> Given that in the US vanity vehicle
Given that in the US vanity vehicle registrations with arbitrary
alphanumeric sequences upto 7 characters are permitted (I am correct I
hope?), I wonder who (here?) owns the UNICODE registration?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा 𑀰𑁆𑀭𑀻𑀭𑀫𑀡𑀰𑀭𑁆𑀫𑀸
just feel like hitting "ESC" too!
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा 𑀰𑁆𑀭𑀻𑀭𑀫𑀡𑀰𑀭𑁆𑀫𑀸
To illustrate…
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा 𑀰𑁆𑀭𑀻𑀭𑀫𑀡𑀰𑀭𑁆𑀫𑀸
m the back of the trumpet!
LOL.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा 𑀰𑁆𑀭𑀻𑀭𑀫𑀡𑀰𑀭𑁆𑀫𑀸
But your outgoing "From" address doesn't seem to have an accent!?
On 26-Jan-2018 13:58, "Andre Schappo via Unicode"
wrote:
>
> Talking of typing names correctly. Few people bother to type the acute
> accent in André.
>
> This academic year, for the first time ever, I gave the following
> challen
On 24-Jan-2018 00:25, "Doug Ewell via Unicode" wrote:
I think it's so cute that some of us think we can advise Nazarbayev on
whether to use straight or curly apostrophes or accents or x's or
whatever. Like he would listen to a bunch of Western technocrats.
Sir why this assumption that everyone
On 23-Jan-2018 10:03, "James Kass via Unicode" wrote:
(bottle, east, skier, crucial, cherry)
s'i's'a, s'yg'ys, s'an'g'ys'y, s'es'u's'i, s'i'i'e
sxixsxa, sxygxys, sxanxgxysxy, sxesxuxsxi, sxixixe
s̈ïs̈a, s̈yg̈ys, s̈an̈g̈ys̈y, s̈es̈üs̈i, s̈ïïe
śíśa, śyǵys, śańǵyśy, śeśúśi, śííe
Announcing:
Much ado about apostrophes
A Play
By
William Codesphere
Coming soon to a theatre near you...
😀
>
> > On 19 January 2018 at 09:16, Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
> > wrote:
> >> Wow. Somebody really needs to convey this to the Kazhaks. Else a
> >> short-sighted decision would ruin their chances at native IDNs. Any
> Kazhaks
> >> on this list?
&
Wow. Somebody really needs to convey this to the Kazhaks. Else a
short-sighted decision would ruin their chances at native IDNs. Any Kazhaks
on this list?
On 19-Jan-2018 00:23, "Asmus Freytag via Unicode"
wrote:
> Top level IDN domain names can not contain 02BC, nor 0027 or 2019.
>
> (RFC 6912 g
ctical for all those other than astronomy buffs but the
physical shapes of the major planets are known to all high school
students…
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा 𑀰𑁆𑀭𑀻𑀭𑀫𑀡𑀰𑀭𑁆𑀫𑀸
Rejecting the digraph method (which is probably the simplest) doesn't have
much meaning because they have different sounds in different languages all
the time like ch in English and German.
Anyhow, it certainly can be difficult convincing non technical political
people.
Modifier letters are more
-space-justification-in-word-2016/4fa1ad30-004c-454f-9775-a3beaa91c88b?auth=1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41652
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा 𑀰𑁆𑀭𑀻𑀭𑀫𑀡𑀰𑀭𑁆𑀫𑀸
grok all the intricacies. So my question:
isn't \b the Unicode-recommended way of identifying full Unicode-aware
word boundaries in regexes? If not, what is?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा 𑀰𑁆𑀭𑀻𑀭𑀫𑀡𑀰𑀭𑁆𑀫𑀸
ot deny that the encoding "just
works".
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
IIUC the limitation seems to be only that functions such as "charAt" do not
recognize that surrogates aren't valid characters:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/charAt
via https://stackoverflow.com/a/8716157/1503120.
This is a problem of many
So how do you think it matters if the characters are in the BMP or SMP?
🌓🌎🌞 <-- lunar eclipse
🌎🌓🌞 <-- solar eclipse
🌎🌞🌗 <-- apocalypse
https://twitter.com/AstroKatie/status/518697246305439745
☺
Not new (2014) but I hadn't seen this till today and felt it a propos re
the recent pair of eclipses.
Shriramana Sharma.
Thanks for your reply, but how can characters be used portably if they
are not part of the published standard yet? Or is it that hereafter
both Unicode Standard + Unicode Emoji Standard will be parallelly
portable or something like that?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
/emoji_dingbats.html – hence asking here. I hope
I didn't miss something.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
for animal in animalKingdom:
createEmojiProposal(animal)
☺
Emoji are a veritable Pandora box.
ls me "Look up!" And sure enough:
261D;WHITE UP POINTING INDEX;So;0;ON;N;
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
uot;akshara" in your
question to avoid confusions by people replying having a different
idea of the meaning of that term.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
This seems quite reasonable.
On 25 Feb 2017 04:06, "Richard Wordingham"
wrote:
> The usual form of this sandhi in modern Sanskrit is described as the a-
> dropping and being replaced by avagraha. If word boundaries are
> represented by SPACE, am I correct in believing that the change in
> codep
That's your definition of non-free then... If I were a font developer and
of mind to release my font for use without charge, I wouldn't want anyone
else to make money out of selling it when I myself - who put the effort
into preparing it - don't make money from selling it. So it protects the
moral
Interested to know why you think OFL is non-free...
On 9 Oct 2016 05:18, "Luke Dashjr" wrote:
> On Saturday, October 08, 2016 5:57:41 PM James Kass wrote:
> > Google and Monotype unveil The Noto Project's unified font for all
> > languages:
> > https://techcrunch.com/2016/10/06/google-and-monoty
Hello.
Kindly advise on what is the most comprehensive and up to date Unicode
character picker for Android available.
Am not able to find a good one.
Thanks..
Isn't there some Japanese orthography feature that already does
something like this?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
I had hoped it would be obvious my reply was not intended to the "best
practices" part of the OP, but to the "potential problems" part of
it... In any case, I have nothing further to say on this topic.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
On 10/5/15, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> On 5 Oct 2015, at 8:14, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681250
>
> And?
Well the OP did say:
I'm researching potential problems and best practices for password
policies that allow non-Latin-1 Un
I recently came across this bug report where a filesystem encrypted
with a Cyrillic script password could not be decrypted at boot time:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681250
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
e word "blind" only stands in the place
of your "unconcerned" and not "unconcerned to individual feelings"...
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
seldom outright malicious of intent,
I feel...
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
point in that if whatever
is part of Unicode is going to become part of ISO 10646, except for
that if by closing its doors to proposal authors, the ISO is going to
communicate only with the UTC, then the UTC would have to take upon
itself the onus of forwarding all proposals to the ISO saying --
Nice -- I was searching for "DASHED BOX" since that's what TUS 7.0 ch
24.1 refers to it as and there are too many "SQUARE" characters...
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
I hope the subject line makes it clear. What character is to be used
when a dashed box such as that shown for special-rendering characters
in the code chart is required to be actually shown in text?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
ather than having to download 92 MB please? (In Asia the
broadband speeds aren't all that fast...)
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
Hi Martin. If you haven't noticed it before, opening Unicode charts in
PDF readers has something like "SECURED" on the top i.o.w. the charts
are sorta DRM-protected. So you can't copy-paste the characters. Heck
you can't even copy-paste the character *names*!
--
Shrir
lems" you foresee?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
The Grantha link is broken. The site no longer exists. I have
contacted the original author. Will post here once he replies.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman
h you probably know but just putting into
writing) is: The consonant letters all denote the same inherent vowel
preceded by one (or, rarely, more) consonant sounds. The independent
vowel letters OTOH all denote different vowel sounds without (for the
most part) any consonant sounds.
HTH,
Shriramana S
Given that Unicode encodes scripts and not languages, how appropriate is it
to call the BMP and the SMP as the multi*lingual* planes?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman
the common man's imagination (and basic
knowledge) like Pluto, and I have not heard any of the other dwarf planets
(Ceres, Haumea, Makemake and Eris) having any symbols...
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
___
Unicode mailing list
Unic
:
[image: Inline image 1]
Has there been any proposal to encode this? (I'm guessing Michael might be
interested...)
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
<<200px-Pluto's_astrological_symbol.svg.png>>___
Unicode mailing list
Un
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> lol. How about you post on github at least?
>
Thanks for the encouragement. I didn't think it would be *that* important
to do that. Please visit now:
https://github.com/jamadagni/cpview
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श
ing bland like
"Codepoint Viewer" would do I suppose...
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> lol. How about you post on github at least?
>
OK good idea. Any objections to re-using the name UniView? I suppose Ishida
is on either of these lists. I would like to hear from him especially.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரம
Not sure if anyone actually tried this app, but just wanted to notify that
I found a small bug. To correct it, insert "4 < " after "elif " on line 15.
Shriramana.
___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
I use Py3, so maybe a few tweaks would be needed to get it working
with Py2. Since it's GPL, please feel free to make derivatives.
I hope the name "UniView" is not copyrighted or anything. Certainly
don't intend to infringe...
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
s
difficult at first. If you delay the adoption of the standard, it only
gets all the harder as time passes, since in the interim even more
people continue to assume the old behaviour...
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
___
Unicode m
ls should not distinguish between the two.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Stephan Stiller
wrote:
> I have been told that Devanagari contains letters (or a letter) that were
> invented merely to complete the rectangular C-V table; not sure to what
> extent they (or it) were used subsequently.
In which reference is this mentioned?
>
14 (4th edition) (WG2 N4459)
> http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2013/13151-n4459.pdf
Dear Ken,
Would I be correct in understanding that these two docs respectively
conform to the characters in stage 7 and stages 4/5/6 as seen in
http://www.unicode.org/alloc/Pipeline.html?
--
Shriramana S
the process is a bit... um 'involved' to
understand for those not directly involved in it (except via
submitting proposals and participating in UTC meetings) like me...
I presume it would be something done six months once and would not be
too much extra work?
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
Congratulations Behdad and especially for integrating Graphite into HB...
:-)
Sent from my Android phone
On Jul 30, 2013 1:56 AM, "Roozbeh Pournader" wrote:
> Some of you probably have heard the news already, but in case you haven't,
> Behdad won the prestigious O'Reilly Open Source Award, annou
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 2:24 AM, James Cloos wrote:
>
> Further testing showed that pango and harfbuzz get it right when using
> the font Pothana2000, and fail with every other font I have to test.
Is it because Pothana doesn't have the dotted circle glyph?
--
Shriramana Sharm
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:16 PM, David Starner wrote:
> I'm pretty sure it's overprinting, but I'm not sure of what.
Looks like 25CA LOZENGE ◊ to me.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
they only facilitate one-to-one mapping.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
Would the encoding of a subjoined consonant series have been considered
bright then? Curious.
When we don't have a problem with subjoined forms of Kannada, Telugu and
Grantha being represented using a virama despite also being taught that
they are "vattu"-s (equivalent to coeng) what exacerbating
(http://svayambhava.org/) fonts that have the extended
Devanagari ligatures required for Sanskrit.
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Michael S. Kaplan
wrote:
> Qty
Uh? I even checked if that is a contraction like QED, but didn't seem
to find any explanation on the net!
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Christopher Fynn wrote:
> In Unicode v1 Tibetan was encoded on the Indic model - but in practice
> there were problems found with this and Tibetan was removed and later
> re-encoded.
I'd like to know what exact "problems". Often I hear "there are
problems" in rela
VA avoiding those extra characters too.
Or have it as you wish and encode 0F6A and 0FBA-0FBC to avoid such
specialized character stuff, but still for the rest of the consonants
including the prevalent -tags forms of YA RA VA, the justification
provided for a full series of atomic subjoining chara
not sure of whether such apps do exist.
(Given that the OS of most of these devices is locked out-of-the-box, one
is limited by the supplied fonts too.)
--
Shriramana Sharma
t, you "agree" to use that
codepoint to represent that written form.
--
Shriramana Sharma
t to Unicode!
But I fail to see the logical connection between Unicode as a
technical standard and Tolkien! I hadn't heard about this website, but
if they purport to write on science, but make such illogical
deductions, I am not sure I'll be reading it much in future.
--
Shriramana Sharma
xt logical stop beyond , even
if FF (or ) is considered too big? (I mean, I'm not sure
how that extra 64Ki chars [10 minus F] could be important...)
Thanks.
--
Shriramana Sharma
Looking at the two sets of Brahmi numbers would also be instructive...
Sent from my Android phone
On Jul 12, 2012 6:21 AM, "Richard Wordingham" <
richard.wording...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> What is a number having a numeric type of "digit" meant to convey?
>
> The old Unicode 2.0 definition definit
for Sinhala speakers. Michael feels it
would have been better if they had been named after the *Indian* Indic
scripts.
--
Shriramana Sharma
ala
people on this list and might be interested.
--
Shriramana Sharma
are used, either way,
annotations or informative aliases would be needed.
BTW there is no point in spending much more time writing on this,
since it is a done thing.
--
Shriramana Sharma
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Richard Wordingham
wrote:
> On the contrary, doubling for (historical) retroflexion is a fairly
> clear convention.
Where, please? I have never heard of it. (But of course my knowledge
is limited.)
--
Shriramana Sharma
rt always needed to get the significance of character
names (except those that are in English). I myself don't understand
all those Cyrillic and rare Latin character names like EZH BUZH etc!
:-)
--
Shriramana Sharma
such "Bengali" script characters as are used in Assamese
orthography.
--
Shriramana Sharma
Umm, is perhaps a khanda ta (somewhat recently encoded) involved?
Sent from my Android phone
On Jul 5, 2012 11:53 PM, "Andreas Prilop" wrote:
> To obtain the Bengali conjunct (ligature) "tka",
> I write
> ta virama ka
> U+09A4 U+09CD U+0995
>
> This worked fine in Windows XP bu
CK MARK;So;0;ON;N;
274C;CROSS MARK;So;0;ON;N;
3003;DITTO MARK;Po;0;ON;N;
3012;POSTAL MARK;So;0;ON;N;
3013;GETA MARK;So;0;ON;N;
303C;MASU MARK;Lo;0;L;N;
1F48B;KISS MARK;So;0;ON;N;
The last one is particularly interesting! ;-)
--
Shriramana Sharma
at 1:30 PM, Michael Everson wrote:
>
> I don't know. Someone will be along looking for a title-cased form.
Hmm, grep "SMALL CAP" UnicodeData.txt does seem to produce many
results... (Wasn't there this website which helped you get Unicode
hacked small caps and script forms of Latin text?)
--
Shriramana Sharma
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
