Peter Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 08/08/2003 08:54, Philippe Verdy wrote:
>
> > ... Could there be another codepoint assigned that has
> >
> >these properties:
> >
> >20CF;ZERO WIDTH SYMBOL;Sk;0;ON; 0020N;
> > [...]
> But I'm not sure that ZERO WIDTH SYMBOL is the best name, unl
"Michael \(michka\) Kaplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: "Peter Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On 24/07/2003 04:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > How to map the code values of the key boards with the code
> > > values for the alphabet given with different Code pages of any
> > > scrip
Michael Everson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Your message has encountered delivery problems
> >to the following recipient(s):
> >
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Delivery failed
> > 554 delivery error: dd This user doesn't have a yahoo.co.in account
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [-5] - mta104.mail.in.yahoo.co
Michael Everson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 20:17 +0100 2003-07-15, Thomas M. Widmann wrote:
> >
> > But if that criterion is applied, surely Georgian Xucuri/Khutsuri
> > should be separated from Georgian Mxedruli/Mkhedruli: Although
> > there roughly is a
John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like someone whose native script is Hebrew to comment on mutual
> intelligibility, which was the main criterion for separating
> Glagolitic from Cyrillic.
But if that criterion is applied, surely Georgian Xucuri/Khutsuri
should be separated from Georgi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > >Yes, I think you're right that an annotation is best -- but only
> > >if EMPTY SET is indeed the right character. I'm increasingly of
> > >the opinion that a different character might be needed.
> >
> > I would disagree.
>
> As would I.
Oh dear, if you both disag
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> John Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/02/2003 10:32:51 AM:
>
> > I would replace the normal termination of the main vertical stem
> > of each letter, and attach the retroflex hook as a straight
> > continuation of this stem (the i with retroflex hook would end up
"Doug Ewell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, so my "mini-essay" against deprecating the Plan 14 language tags
> didn't turn out quite so "mini" after all.
It was very interesting.
> [...]
> Other scripts besides Han can benefit from plain-text language tagging
> as well. A common Latin-script
8 matches
Mail list logo
