> * Does the existence of the legacy Adobe encoding Adobe-Japan1-6 shift the
> balance? It has a SQUARE TB at CID+8306.
The code point suggests that it was already there as early as
Adobe-Japan1-1 in 1993. The fact makes it seem certainly weird why it
hasn't been included like its fellows nearby.
Hi there,
I cannot help but notice the new home.unicode.org site embraces a new
logo, blue base color with a humanist type, rather than the
traditional one, red and geometric. Does anybody know if it means that
Unicode wants to renew its logo or that they serve for different
purposes? Which should
is ☕️ :
> Thanks, it definitely looks like there are some mismatches in terminology
> there. Can you please file this with the reporting form on the unicode site?
>
> {phone}
>
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2018, 05:00 Yifán Wáng via Unicode
> wrote:
>>
>> When I'm looking
When I'm looking at
https://unicode.org/Public/emoji/11.0/emoji-sequences.txt
It goes on line 16 that:
--
# type_field: any of {Emoji_Combining_Sequence, Emoji_Flag_Sequence,
Emoji_Modifier_Sequence}
# The type_field is a convenience for parsing the emoji sequence
files, and is not i
2018-03-12 16:39 GMT+09:00 Alastair Houghton via Unicode :
> On 11 Mar 2018, at 21:14, Marcel Schneider via Unicode
> wrote:
>>
>> Indeed, to be fair. And for implementers, documenting themselves in English
>> may scarcely ever have much of a problem, no matter whatʼs the locale.
>
> Agreed. Imp
5 matches
Mail list logo
