Hi, Sorry for delayed reply. The reason I posted here was that I wasn't sure how it was intended to become. Do you have an idea whether I can trust actual type_field value of each row over the description in the current txt file?
Thanks, Wang Yifan 2018-06-09 20:10 GMT+09:00 Mark Davis ☕️ <m...@macchiato.com>: > Thanks, it definitely looks like there are some mismatches in terminology > there. Can you please file this with the reporting form on the unicode site? > > {phone} > > On Sat, Jun 9, 2018, 05:00 Yifán Wáng via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> > wrote: >> >> When I'm looking at >> https://unicode.org/Public/emoji/11.0/emoji-sequences.txt >> >> It goes on line 16 that: >> ---------- >> # type_field: any of {Emoji_Combining_Sequence, Emoji_Flag_Sequence, >> Emoji_Modifier_Sequence} >> # The type_field is a convenience for parsing the emoji sequence >> files, and is not intended to be maintained as a property. >> ---------- >> >> This field, however, actually contains "Emoji_Keycap_Sequence" and >> "Emoji_Tag_Sequence", instead of "Emoji_Combining_Sequence" (it was >> already so in 5.0). >> >> And I go back to >> http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr51/ >> >> Under the section 1.4.6: >> ---------- >> ED-21. emoji keycap sequence set — The specific set of emoji sequences >> listed in the emoji-sequences.txt file [emoji-data] under the category >> Emoji_Keycap_Sequence. >> ED-22. emoji modifier sequence set — The specific set of emoji >> sequences listed in the emoji-sequences.txt file [emoji-data] under >> the category Emoji_Modifier_Sequence. >> ED-23. RGI emoji flag sequence set — The specific set of emoji >> sequences listed in the emoji-sequences.txt file [emoji-data] under >> the category Emoji_Flag_Sequence. >> ED-24. RGI emoji tag sequence set — The specific set of emoji >> sequences listed in the emoji-sequences.txt file [emoji-data] under >> the category Emoji_Tag_Sequence. >> ---------- >> >> I'm not sure if the "category" means "type_field" or headings in the >> txt file, as the headings do not contain underscores. If it means >> "type_field", then the description of type_field above is wrong. >> >> Also the section 1.4.5: >> ---------- >> ED-14c. emoji keycap sequence — A sequence of the following form: >> >> emoji_keycap_sequence := [0-9#*] \x{FE0F 20E3} >> >> - These characters are in the emoji-sequences.txt file listed under >> the category Emoji_Keycap_Sequence >> ---------- >> While in the previous version (rev. 12): >> ---------- >> ED-14c. emoji keycap sequence — An emoji combining sequence of the >> following form: >> >> emoji_keycap_sequence := [0-9#*] \x{FE0F 20E3} >> >> - These characters are in the emoji-sequences.txt file listed under >> the category Emoji_Combining_Keycap_Sequence >> ---------- >> >> It seems there was some kind of confusion on terms, but anyway, isn't >> the last line of ED-14c redundant with the current revision? (Or >> "Emoji_Combining_Sequence" is intended?) >> >> Thank you. >> >> Wang Yifan >> >