it is not clear whether you are quoting from some agreed standard, quoting from
some other authority, or constructing a classification of your own
whatever the classification, it should be descriptive, and it is best not to be
too pedantic, because practice can vary from region to region, from
OK, he's no technocrat, but try googling "tony blair kazakhstan"
and in case anybody's wondering what Nazarbayev got for his five million
pounds,
for a partial explanation, check out
https://www.rt.com/uk/340035-blair-strike-kazakhstan-massacre/
it is not known if Blair profferred any
. . . and do Russians still do mathematics?
I guess not, since there is no Cyrillic counterpart to the AMS extensions
also, chemists sometimes like to put a superscript over a subscript
will that still have to be done using rich text?
or maybe we need another extension . . . ?
/phil
there is another issue with these symbols -- they appear among the
mathematical symbols but, in the reference given, they are used as delimiters
I know of no other application for these symbols other than as delimiters --
are they used as mathematical operators?
and how, in general, would
From: David Starner prosfil...@gmail.com
To: Andreas Stötzner a...@signographie.de
Cc: “unicode“ Discussion unicode@unicode.org
Sent: Sunday, 26 May 2013, 22:15
Subject: Re: Suggestion for new dingbats/symbols
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Andreas Stötzner a...@signographie.de
wrote:
From: Michel Suignard mic...@suignard.com
To: philip chastney philip_chast...@yahoo.com
Cc: unicode List unicode@unicode.org
Sent: Monday, 17 December 2012, 23:37
Subject: RE: wrongly identified geometric shape
I spent some times analyzing your documents and I can see you are trying
On 2012/Dec/08 02:34, Michel Suignard wrote:
From:philip chastney
anybody converting a document currently using Wingding fonts to one using
Unicode values and Unicode fonts instead, using the transliteration proposed
in N 4384, will find their squares somewhat diminished in size (in this
From:William_J_G Overington
wjgo_10...@btinternet.com
To: unicode@unicode.org
Cc: wjgo_10...@btinternet.com
Sent: Friday, 9 November 2012, 11:29
Subject: Re: Missing geometric shapes
Should the original NO RATING be split into two different items, such as
From: Asmus Freytag asm...@ix.netcom.com
To: Unicode Mailing List unicode@unicode.org
Sent: Monday, 7 May 2012, 1:36
Subject: Variant glyphs for mathematical symbols
First question:
When the integral symbols were encoded in Unicode there was
discussion of
From: Asmus Freytag asm...@ix.netcom.com
To: Unicode Mailing List unicode@unicode.org
Sent: Monday, 7 May 2012, 1:36
Subject: Variant glyphs for mathematical symbols
Second question:
When the mathematical relations were encoded there were
variants that were
Dear Sir or Madam:
http://ccatunisie.com/bhrxdfhj.php?fyhCID=48
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:19:47
_
There, said she, just by the side of the little fir-tree. (c) Llerifer
wildwiresin
A little work on the size tables given on page 3 of ISO/IEC
JTC1/SC2/WG2 N 4115, Proposal to add Wingdings and Webdings
Symbols, shows that the two tables used in N4115 (for diamonds
and squares) are near enough identical to each other, and to the
range of sizes illustrated in Table 2.5 in UTR 25
From: Michael Everson ever...@evertype.com
To: unicode Unicode Discussion unicode@unicode.org
Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2012, 18:46
Subject: Re: Upside Down Fu character
On 3 Jan 2012, at 18:28, Rick McGowan wrote:
I would say to use higher level mark-up or
Corrected Version::
- Forwarded Message -
From: philip chastney philip_chast...@yahoo.com
To: Michael Everson ever...@evertype.com; unicode Unicode Discussion
unicode@unicode.org
Sent: Wednesday, 4 January 2012, 9:57
Subject: Re: Upside Down Fu character
the SIL PUA
(http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsiid=PUA_home) is
slowly being absorbed into TUS
one character yet to be added is the U+F1BC MODIFIER LETTER SMALL H WITH STROKE
the chart for Latin Extended-D
(http://www.unicode.org/Public/6.1.0/charts/blocks/UA720.pdf) has
FWIW, if I were you, I'd forget all about CLDR
for one thing, there is no evidence that the originators of EPA ever
considered title-casing, and I think it would be wrong of us to
retro-fit mechanisms which were not part of the original
as Doug Ewell remarked in another thread, character names
16 matches
Mail list logo
