Dele Olawole dba African Oracle oracle at africaservice dot com wrote:
Doug do you have problem with African Oracle? It is the way this email
address is set up. It is being used for hundreds of mailing list and
it is owned by Dele Olawole so no masquarading, moonlighting,
disgusing or
There were a lot of costs and lost productivity that resulted
from local users using custom 8-bit encodings. We used to do it because
there was no alternative. Now there is an alternative, however, and
Unicode is definitely the better choice for the local users, because
they will be able to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: African Oracle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: Just if and where is the then?
Dele Olawole dba African Oracle oracle at africaservice dot com wrote:
Doug do you have problem with African Oracle? It is the way this email
address is set
On 05/05/2004 11:56, John Hudson wrote:
R.C. Bakhuizen van den Brink [Rein] wrote:
How well does low-budget Eudora support Unicode?
Eudora does not currently support Unicode, but the very excellent and
*free* Mozilla Thunderbird e-mail program does. See:
Peter Kirk wrote:
Eudora does not currently support Unicode, but the very excellent and
*free* Mozilla Thunderbird e-mail program does. See:
http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/
But does it display the Oracle's Yoruba correctly? Mozilla 1.6 doesn't.
Or maybe it's the default plain text
African Oracle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the time we get to know one another very well, people will notice some
humour in my style of writing. Like I pulled Peter's leg, I was pulling
yours with that question. Smiling with you.
Would you mind cutting it out? I get enough mail on this
From: African Oracle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If a can have U+0061 and have a composite that is U+00e2...U+...
If e can have U+0065 and have a composite that is U+00ea...U+...
Then why is e with accented grave or acute and dot below cannot be assigned
a single unicode value instead of the
, 2004 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: Just if and where is the then?
From: African Oracle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If a can have U+0061 and have a composite that is U+00e2...U+...
If e can have U+0065 and have a composite that is U+00ea...U+...
Then why is e with accented grave or acute and dot below cannot
Dele and Philippe,
The solution is *not* to develop a new African 8-bit encoding that
encodes E and e as precomposed characters, and then try to use that
as a justification for getting them encoded as precomposed characters in
Unicode, but without any canonical equivalence.
The solution is to
Peter Constable petercon at microsoft dot com wrote:
So how come the majority of Polish people living abroad - let's say
40 millions against 40 million living in Poland - is not able of
using their native characters - also called 'ogonki' - in their
e-mails?
I'm not aware of any reason why
From: Doug Ewell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The solution is *not* to develop a new African 8-bit encoding that
encodes E and e as precomposed characters, and then try to use that
as a justification for getting them encoded as precomposed characters in
Unicode, but without any canonical equivalence.
Only if their e-mail systems don't support Unicode and they are forced
to write in ISO 8859-1 or Windows CP1252, which don't support any
precomposed letters with ogonek or combining ogonek.
Well, if there e-mail systems don't support Unicode, it's not because
there isn't anything available
Philippe Verdy scripsit:
Did I develop and promote such encoding? I will not because I don't
need it.
It's up to African communities or governments or local instituions
and educational organizations to decide if they wish such encoding,
if this development is justified by a reasonable
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Philippe Verdy
It's up to African communities or governments or local instituions and
educational organizations to decide if they wish such encoding, if
this
development is justified by a reasonable reduction of costs with an
: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: Just if and where is the then?
From: Doug Ewell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The solution is *not* to develop a new African 8-bit encoding that
encodes E and e as precomposed characters, and then try to use that
as a justification for getting them encoded
- Original Message -
From: Philippe Verdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Doug Ewell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Unicode List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: Just if and where is the then?
From: Doug Ewell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The solution is *not* to develop a new African 8-bit
It's up to African communities or governments or local instituions and
educational organizations to decide if they wish such encoding, if this
development is justified by a reasonable reduction of costs with an
increased
compatibility with low-cost softwares and systems, and simplified
Do low-end hardware and systems exist outside the
M$ Windows community?
How well does Mac/Apple software [I'm not talking about the 'X'
op.sys] support Unicode?
How well does low-budget Eudora support Unicode?
I'm just one of these medieval people who cannot enjoy the
blessings of Unicode
Dele Olawole, who sometimes goes by African Oracle oracle at
africaservice dot com, wrote:
Did I develop and promote such encoding? I will not because I don't
need it. - Doug
These were Philippe's words, not mine.
I had said that a new African 8-bit encoding with precomposed E and
friends
: African Oracle [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Philippe Verdy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: Just if and where is the then?
Dele and Philippe,
The solution is *not* to develop a new African 8-bit encoding that
encodes E and e as precomposed characters, and then try to use
On May 5, 2004, at 6:32 AM, John Cowan wrote:
Low (indeed, zero) cost software is now available that runs well on
low-end hardware and fully supports the Unicode Standard, with no need
for font hacks or further 8-bit encodings.
There is, moreover, a non-zero cost to revising a program or OS to use
On May 5, 2004, at 12:59 AM, R.C. Bakhuizen van den Brink [Rein] wrote:
How well does Mac/Apple software [I'm not talking about the 'X'
op.sys] support Unicode?
Not as well as we would like, although the potential is there through
ATSUI and MLTE. I should point out, however, that the probability
From: Jon Hanna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Knowing that Unicode-ISO/IEC 10646 is a now de facto standard (after being a
de
jure one in ISO) will clearly guide those charset developments complying
with
Unicode rules and policies, so that such adoption will not create a
nightmare
to
handle,
Dele, who moonlights as African Oracle oracle at africaservice dot
com, wrote:
Laughter: Yes, Doug I could see what you have done, but it does not
appear right or look right. It is just like putting the nose where the
eyes are supposed to be a bit out of phase; especially with the dot
below
Quoting Philippe Verdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For me ISO-8859-1/2 will continue to be used for very long
periods.
Just updating every PNG file in the world will obviously take a long time. Since
that format references ISO 8859-1 it's going to mean that ISO 8859-1 will be
around for a long time,
Laughter: Yes, Doug I could see what you have done, but it does not
appear right or look right. It is just like putting the nose where the
eyes are supposed to be a bit out of phase; especially with the dot
below and even worst when one is considering O with dot below...
It looks fine,
John Jenkins scripsit:
There is, moreover, a non-zero cost to revising a program or OS to use
a new 8-bit encoding. Realistically, people running machines or using
software too old to use Unicode aren't likely to get much advantage at
this point by the creation of a new 8-bit standard.
: Just if and where is the then?
Dele, who moonlights as African Oracle oracle at africaservice dot
com, wrote:
Laughter: Yes, Doug I could see what you have done, but it does not
appear right or look right. It is just like putting the nose where the
eyes are supposed to be a bit out
From: Doug Ewell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guarantee you that creating a new 8-bit encoding specific to the
language(s) you are dealing with, and getting fonts developed for that
encoding, and trying to exchange data in this new encoding with others,
will cause more problems for the university than
Verdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Doug Ewell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Unicode List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: Just if and where is the then?
From: Doug Ewell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guarantee you that creating a new 8-bit encoding specific to the
language(s) you
OK, John
how well Unicode compatible are these operating systems?
Eudora may be obsolete, but have you got any idea how big the installed
base of Eudora is?
groetjes, Rein
On Wed, 5 May 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
R.C. Bakhuizen van den Brink [Rein] scripsit:
Do low-end hardware and
On Wednesday, May 05, 2004 5:29 PM, John Jenkins va escriure:
I should point out, however, that the probability of
getting the pre-X versions of the Mac OS to support new 8-bit
character sets is exactly 0.
Would the various Indian scripts not yet covered by ILK, count as new
character sets?
At 20:15 +0200 2004-05-05, R.C. Bakhuizen van den Brink [Rein] wrote:
Eudora may be obsolete, but have you got any idea how big the installed
base of Eudora is?
I use it too. I keep asking them to Unicodify Eudora. I guess that's
all we can do.
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * *
On May 5, 2004, at 12:09 PM, Antoine Leca wrote:
On Wednesday, May 05, 2004 5:29 PM, John Jenkins va escriure:
I should point out, however, that the probability of
getting the pre-X versions of the Mac OS to support new 8-bit
character sets is exactly 0.
Would the various Indian scripts not yet
R.C. Bakhuizen van den Brink [Rein] wrote:
How well does low-budget Eudora support Unicode?
Eudora does not currently support Unicode, but the very excellent and *free* Mozilla
Thunderbird e-mail program does. See: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/
John Hudson
--
Tiro Typeworks
At 11:59 PM 5/4/2004, R.C. Bakhuizen van den Brink [Rein] wrote:
How well does low-budget Eudora support Unicode?
Mixed.
It allows messages to be sent for viewing in a browser window; that enables
both Unicode support and additional HTML support not found in the Eudora
viewer. I use that feature
R.C. Bakhuizen van den Brink [Rein] wrote:
how well Unicode compatible are these operating systems?
Eudora may be obsolete, but have you got any idea how big the installed
base of Eudora is?
So bug Qualcomm to add Unicode support to Eudora. The idea that an international standard
should be
Afrian Oracle wrote...
The Yoruba Digital Consortium
www.africaservice.com/yorubadigital might push the idea of e, o with dot
below and grave or acute accent to make it easier for font and keyboard
developers to implement.
What do you think?
My opinion: it isn't easier, just different. The
Besides it requires a special instruction to have E in a font table as
suggested by the guys at Fontlabs which I am yet to experiment. But since
Peter is here, he can shed more light on how this can be implemented.
Dele, you will want to learn about the OpenType technology. I recommend that
thanks Peter. More to read!
Regards
Dele
- Original Message -
From: Peter Constable [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Unicode Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 10:54 PM
Subject: RE: Just if and where is the then?
Besides it requires a special instruction to have E
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf
Of Philippe Verdy
I guarantee you that creating a new 8-bit encoding specific to the
language(s) you are dealing with, and getting fonts developed for
that
encoding, and trying to exchange data in this new encoding with
others,
[Original Message]
From: African Oracle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 5/4/2004 7:04:48 PM
Subject: Just if and where is the then?
If a can have U+0061 and have a composite that is U+00e2...U+...
If e can have U+0065 and have a composite that is U+00ea...U+...
Then why
encodings?
No new composite values will be added. - Peter Constable
The above sounds dictatorial in nature.
Dele
- Original Message -
From: Peter Constable [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 10:27 PM
Subject: RE: Just if and where is the then?
If a can
The existing composites were included only out of necessity so that
new
Unicode implementations could interoperate with existing
implementations
using legacy industry-standard encodings. - Peter Constable
Are we saying we have exhausted such necessity?
Yes, because by definition legacy
From: African Oracle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The existing composites were included only out of necessity so that new
Unicode implementations could interoperate with existing implementations
using legacy industry-standard encodings. - Peter Constable
Are we saying we have exhausted such necessity?
Thanks to have taken the time to explain.
Regards
Dele
- Original Message -
From: Peter Constable [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 12:50 AM
Subject: RE: Just if and where is the then?
The existing composites were included only out of necessity
Dele,
No new composite values will be added. - Peter Constable
The above sounds dictatorial in nature.
Peter has already explained that this is just the nature
of the current policy regarding such additions. The reason
for the policy others in this thread have attempted to
explain. The short
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 2:38 AM
Subject: Re: Just if and where is the then?
Dele,
No new composite values will be added. - Peter Constable
The above sounds dictatorial in nature.
Peter has already explained that this is just the nature
of the current policy regarding
African Oracle scripsit:
Are we saying we have exhausted such necessity?
Yes.
And what are these legacy-standard encodings?
Those devised by ISO, various national governments, IBM, Microsoft, and Apple,
roughly speaking.
No new composite values will be added. - Peter Constable
The above
So why can we have zillions of CJK code points and make a fuss about
a few single code points that must be composed by an ever growing
intelligent display software that is also supposed to run on all
platforms?
So why are we unifying all middle east past and present
scripts?
Why are the few
P.S.
I forgot mr. M.E. who is aiming at the top right now just before
mr. P.K.
--
So why can we have zillions of CJK code points and make a fuss about
a few single code points that must be composed by an ever growing
intelligent display software that is also supposed to run on all
Better technical response than the one got from the guy at Microsoft.
Thanks
Dele
- Original Message -
From: Ernest Cline [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: African Oracle [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 10:27 PM
Subject: RE: Just if and where
52 matches
Mail list logo