David Hopwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> d is just a glyph variant of t. Encotï¸e it as "t ". ;-)
d is just t plus U+3099 (ã). Isn't that right, ããããã ãããã?
-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Lukas Pietsch wrote:
> > Would you by chance mean 'threads' ?
>
> > There is a difference, you know ;-)
>
> Quite right. And, in order to prove Stefan's point: how about starting a
> new thread/threat now about why we Germans are so prone to confuse these
> le
On 02/27/2002 06:26:02 AM Alain LaBonté wrote:
> So the discussion started with stability of "country" codes... If a
code
>represents a political territory, it can NOT be stable by nature, whether
>it is alphabetic or numeric. The only stability you can expect has to do
>with the non-reassign
A 08:48 2002-02-27 -0800, Doug Ewell a écrit :
>The relevance of all of this to Unicode (besides the link to
>internationalization) is that, unlike ISO 3166, Unicode has a policy that
>forbids changing the name or position of a character once it has been
>assigned.
[Alain] And of course there is
Alain LaBonté a écrit:
>So the discussion started with stability of "country" codes... If a
code
> represents a political territory, it can NOT be stable by nature,
whether
> it is alphabetic or numeric. The only stability you can expect has to do
> with the non-reassignment of a code within
A 10:48 2002-02-27 +0100, Marco Cimarosti a écrit :
>What beats me, is how this discussion mutated to Canadian ethnology!
[Alain] Since I started this sub-threa[d|t], it was to say that initial
Canada, in the case Québec would become a country (something which is not
impossible), would no long
>From: "Lukas Pietsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Unicode List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Recent Threats
>Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 11:48:31 +0100
>
>
>
> > Would you by chance mean 'threads' ?
>
> > There is a
> Would you by chance mean 'threads' ?
> There is a difference, you know ;-)
Quite right. And, in order to prove Stefan's point: how about starting a
new thread/threat now about why we Germans are so prone to confuse these
letters, and what consequences that ought to have for a possible
unific
Stefan Probst wrote:
> can somebody pls. explain to me dummy, what the long threats about
> R(o|u)mania, Canada, California, Yankees, and Initials in various
> countries..
> have to do with Unicode?
ISO 3166 (3-letter identifiers for countries) is one of the standards
related to the so
Would you by chance mean 'threads' ?
There is a difference, you know ;-)
A./
At 04:49 PM 2/26/02 +0700, Stefan Probst wrote:
>Good Evening,
>
>can somebody pls. explain to me dummy, what the long threats about
>R(o|u)mania, Canada, California, Yankees, and Initials in various
>countries..
Good Evening,
can somebody pls. explain to me dummy, what the long threats about
R(o|u)mania, Canada, California, Yankees, and Initials in various
countries..
have to do with Unicode?
Maybe I don't understand the deeper implications not yet? ;)
Cheers,
Stefan
11 matches
Mail list logo
