From: Christopher John Fynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone have a list of other standards, protocols, RFC's etc which specify
Unicode (in any of it's encoding formats) as the base, default or
preferred
character set to be used?
For RFCs it's not difficult to get this list using the RFCeditor.org
Philippe Verdy writes:
From: Christopher John Fynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone have a list of other standards, protocols, RFC's etc which
specify Unicode (in any of it's encoding formats) as the base,
default or preferred character set to be used?
For RFCs it's not difficult to get this list
It looks to me like Christopher is not after an analysis of what standards could somehow be squeezed
to use Unicode charsets, but rather a list of standards that _specify_ (actively, not potentially)
Unicode/10646.
The obvious ones are of course
HTML (at least since 4.01:
- Message d'origine -
De: Markus Scherer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It looks to me like Christopher is not after an analysis of what standards
could somehow be squeezed
to use Unicode charsets, but rather a list of standards that _specify_
(actively, not potentially)
Unicode/10646.
The
From: Patrick Andries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
De: Markus Scherer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It looks to me like Christopher is not after an analysis of what
standards
could somehow be squeezed
to use Unicode charsets, but rather a list of standards that _specify_
(actively, not potentially)
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Andries
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 2:38 PM
To: Markus Scherer; unicode
Subject: Re: UNICODE OTHER STANDARDS
- Message d'origine -
De: Markus Scherer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It looks to me like Christopher is not after
6 matches
Mail list logo
