: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Andries
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 2:38 PM
To: Markus Scherer; unicode
Subject: Re: UNICODE & OTHER STANDARDS
- Message d'origine -
De: "Markus Scherer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It looks to me like
From: "Patrick Andries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> De: "Markus Scherer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > It looks to me like Christopher is not after an analysis of what
standards
> could somehow be squeezed
> > to use Unicode charsets, but rather a list of standards that _specify_
> (actively, not potentially
- Message d'origine -
De: "Markus Scherer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It looks to me like Christopher is not after an analysis of what standards
could somehow be squeezed
> to use Unicode charsets, but rather a list of standards that _specify_
(actively, not potentially)
> Unicode/10646.
>
>
It looks to me like Christopher is not after an analysis of what standards could somehow be squeezed
to use Unicode charsets, but rather a list of standards that _specify_ (actively, not potentially)
Unicode/10646.
The obvious ones are of course
HTML (at least since 4.01: http://www.w3.org/TR/ht
Philippe Verdy writes:
>From: "Christopher John Fynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Anyone have a list of other standards, protocols, RFC's etc which
>> specify Unicode (in any of it's encoding formats) as the base,
>> default or preferred character set to be used?
>
> For RFCs it's not difficult to get
From: "Christopher John Fynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Anyone have a list of other standards, protocols, RFC's etc which specify
> Unicode (in any of it's encoding formats) as the base, default or
preferred
> character set to be used?
For RFCs it's not difficult to get this list using the RFCeditor.o
Anyone have a list of other standards, protocols, RFC's etc which specify
Unicode (in any of it's encoding formats) as the base, default or preferred
character set to be used?
- Chris
--
Christopher J. Fynn
7 matches
Mail list logo
