Apparently even Councilman Jim Kenney, an ardent defender of the historic preservation concept, now recognizes that the process as currently practiced by the Historical Commission is severely flawed. He opposes Jannie Blackwell's Bill 040003 but tried to introduce one of his own, the intent of
I
recently saw anextremely realisticslate roof alternative. It
did not appear tobemade ofasphalt but insteadof a rubber-like material.
Even on close examination, it looked exactly like slate. I believe that it
is installed in individual pieces, like slate. I read somewhere that it is
about
There is _no reason whatsoever_ to even _bother_ with debating fine
points of the
Bible on this matter.
Or this matter for that matter.
What is matter? Never mind.
What is mind? Never matter.
Who is gay? Who is married?
You know what I say?
None of your fucking business.
Thanks,
John
On 19 Feb, 2004, at 18:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/19/2004 12:46:01 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Re: Slate Roof. Unfortunately, replacing a slate roof has, in my
opinion,
become prohibitively expensive.
Replacing ANY roof is very pricey - slate
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Brian Siano wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry, Dan, but scripture is not clear on this subject. Just as
the Bible has been manipulated to justify slavery, colonization of
less developed peoples, and opression of women, scripture is still
being
Quoting Samuel Nicolary [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
To say that the bible is not the basis of our legal system is a bit naive.
I think it played a big role in the lives and morality of all the
lawmakers that have contributed to it. I don't think I need to elaborate
on that one.
It is not as clear
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Samuel Nicolary [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
To say that the bible is not the basis of our legal system is a bit naive.
I think it played a big role in the lives and morality of all the
lawmakers that have contributed to it. I don't think I need to elaborate
on that
Wow. Thanks for that enlightenment. I always knew there was something
fishy about pointing to bibical text as proof God hates queers, but I've
never seen it presented that way. That was great. Since there seem to be
so many people who seek to use it as tool to hate, exclude, and inhibit,
why
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Brian Siano wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Samuel Nicolary [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
To say that the bible is not the basis of our legal system is a bit naive.
I think it played a big role in the lives and morality of all the
lawmakers that have
Samuel - your point is a good one. And I add that perhaps in taking this a
step at a time we may eventually as a society move closer toward affecting
these kinds of social contracts regardless of the nature of the
relationship between individuals. But there is one major point feel you
have
Just wanted to add that I was spellingbiblical incorectly in the past
messages. I am hereby correcting the spelling in the subject line.
M. M. Harvey
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Samuel - your point is a good one. And I add that perhaps in taking this a
step at a time we may eventually as a society move closer toward affecting
these kinds of social contracts regardless of the nature of the
relationship between
Samuel Nicolary wrote:
I guess my point is that because laws are not required to be in accordance
with the bible does not mean we should forget that most lawmakers
throughout history have been christian or at least have pretended to be
and that christianity has a huge impact on legislature both
...We can instantiate any amount
of laws on the subject but that isn't going to make society and its
various organizations accept it - that is not the role of government
anyway, right?
It is true that enacting a law cannot make people be more accepting of
the issue, and that government cannot
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Brian Siano wrote:
Samuel Nicolary wrote:
I guess my point is that because laws are not required to be in accordance
with the bible does not mean we should forget that most lawmakers
throughout history have been christian or at least have pretended to be
and that
Why even argue this? The Moron (yeah, the _moron_ born again freak that is
leading our country) Bush, is about to amend the constitution against gay
marriage.
How can you all debate this and support this guy? (I'm saying _you all_,
not just the quoted individuals in this thread)
--On Friday, February 20, 2004 2:10 PM -0500 Samuel Nicolary
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Andrew Diller wrote:
Why even argue this? The Moron (yeah, the _moron_ born again freak that
is leading our country) Bush, is about to amend the constitution
against gay marriage.
I
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Andrew Diller wrote:
Why even argue this? The Moron (yeah, the _moron_ born again freak that is
leading our country) Bush, is about to amend the constitution against gay
marriage.
I didn't realize that the president branch of our government could ammend
the constitution
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Brian Siano wrote:
Samuel Nicolary wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Brian Siano wrote:
Samuel Nicolary wrote:
I guess my point is that because laws are not required to be in accordance
with the bible does not mean we should forget that most lawmakers
My sedimants, exactly, Sam. How can anyone determine we are voting for
Bush because we are discussing the gay marriage issue???
I hate to say it, but I don't see one bastard worth voting for in this
upcoming election that would make my day. Not one.
But you I can tell you now, and you can
I'm starting to miss the mean dog not on a leash discussions.
Jonathan A. Cass
Silverman, Bernheim Vogel
Two Penn Center Plaza, Suite 910
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Tel: 215-636-4435
Fax: 215-636-3999
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This electronic message contains information from the law firm of
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Andrew Diller wrote:
--On Friday, February 20, 2004 2:10 PM -0500 Samuel Nicolary
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Andrew Diller wrote:
Why even argue this? The Moron (yeah, the _moron_ born again freak that
is leading our country) Bush, is
**FREE** PENN ALEXANDER COMMUNITY SCHOOL
4209 Spruce Street
(Please enter at 43rd and Locust Streets)
February 24, 2004 - March 30, 2004
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
See Below for Details about these exciting upcoming
events at the Penn Alexander Community School:
Puppet Show and Puppet Making Workshop
Thought people may get a kick out of this. Kinda fits in with the topic of
conversation...
http://www.sfgate.com/columnists/fiore/
-Paul
_
Paul Grossman
IT Support Specialist
School of Medicine Information Services
University of Pennsylvania
423 Guardian Drive/
The mercury hearing in Philadelphia will be on Wednesday, February 25th. Apologies
for any confusion.
In a message dated 2/19/2004 1:34:00 PM Eastern Standard Time, BGAndersen writes:
Subj: Opportunity for Philadelphia-area members
Date: 2/19/2004 1:05:11 PM Eastern Standard Time
Hi,
I was asked to share this with the listserves that I post to.
BGA
In a message dated 2/20/2004 2:09:14 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Environment2004
http://bm23.com/x/trackclick.php?i=1906741k=OWfIm=16223url=http://environment2004.org
E'04 Bulletin - February
Me too
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Cass [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Feb 20, 2004 2:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [UC] gay marriage
I'm starting to miss the mean dog not on a leash discussions.
Jonathan A. Cass
Silverman, Bernheim Vogel
Two Penn Center Plaza, Suite 910
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The mercury hearing in Philadelphia will be on Wednesday, February 25th. Apologies for any confusion.
The following article is especially illuminating re the EPA under the
Bush regime:
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040308s=kennedy
The Junk Science of George
This
is a tradional pancake supper with excellent food. Come enjoy a break from
the tedium of winter!
Vanessa Albert Lowry Greenberg Traurig, LLP Two
Commerce Square 2001 Market Street
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 215-988-7811 fax:215-988-7801/rightfax 215-717-5233
-Original
I'm not sure of which forum you're speaking of ... but I see nothing wrong with sending out this kind of information.
In a message dated 2/20/04 8:13:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is one thing to send around information about a specific meeting or a
topic of specific relevance to the
Samuel Nicolary wrote:
To say that the bible is not the basis of our legal system is a bit naive.
I think it played a big role in the lives and morality of all the
lawmakers that have contributed to it. I don't think I need to elaborate
on that one.
I guess my point is that because laws
I wonder why the media hasn't been making a big deal about the fact
that John Kerry is a member of that secret society that controls the
world -- the Yale Skull and Bones?
Yes, he was elected a member in 1966, two years before George Bush.
T.T.F.N.
William H. Magill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
The real power in that group is controlled by aliens.
The humans are only being let in to give the society
an identifiable human personna. They are being
controlled by the Vulcans and subterrainian martians.
I have a lot of information about this but
you have to tell me the secret password
33 matches
Mail list logo
