Melani Lamond wrote:
Doesn't this also mean that we also have to remember that non-joiners are not
the superior group of citizens either; they don't have the greater right to
berate joiners and the groups they join?
like I said, we're all stakeholders. which means non-joiners
are not a super
In a message dated 10/5/07 5:38:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> ...the other day al posted something about individual
> responsibilities vs group participation. the idea that one
> need not join a group in order to be considered an equal
> urban dweller.
>
> yes, I think this is where people g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/4/2007 8:41:14 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it is a little presumptuous of Sharif Ali to appoint himself
and his friends the Stakeholders. Seems to me that when folks who
had spent some 15 years drafting
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN wrote:
link: http://tinyurl.com/293ecp
UC community stakeholders plan to host public forums on
UCD
By Nicole Contosta UC Review
The University City Community Stakeholders will be
distributing petitions at this week's first Thursday
meeting, October 6 at the Walnut West B
At the risk of evoking Chris Hibbard's venom, I put the poster for the Oct
22 West Philadelphia Mayoral Candidates Forum online so a copy would be
readily available to everybody. Of course, I committed what the anointed will
probably consider the sin of uploading it to my own company website.
In a message dated 10/4/2007 8:41:14 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it is a little presumptuous of Sharif Ali to appoint himself and his
friends the Stakeholders. Seems to me that when folks who had spent some 15
years drafting, researching, and presenting t
