On Tuesday, September 30, 2003, at 05:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every list-serve I have ever been on has had a set of rules, or
netiquette such as no flaming or personal attacks. To be honest,
this is the only list I have ever been on that has or allows so many
such attacks. All of the
On Tuesday, September 30, 2003, at 12:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BLAH BLAH BLAHH
Then why have a list if you plan to sensor free speech?
If people missuse or offend then let them answer themselves to the
offended
party. Let the politicians so called community groups look here for
a report
From: Brian Siano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [UC] [ADMIN] decorum (and more noise)
I'm against it. I'd prefer to know which people are assholes and which
aren't, and telling them to keep it under wraps makes it more difficult.
I agree - I don't have a problem with the noise
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [UC] [ADMIN] decorum (and more noise)
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 17:52:41 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do people feel about establishing a rule, no ethnic, racial,
religious, gender or sexual orientation slurs, even if the intent is
irony or parody? And/or, maybe something
Begin forwarded message:
From: Elliot Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Oct 1, 2003 09:01:55 US/Eastern
To: Richard Hotchkiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [UC] [ADMIN] decorum (and more noise)
While I wouldn't recommend that Jeff, or anybody, volunteer to
moderate the list, I think
I quite agree with Ross Bender.
As a person of color, I did not find his post to be an ethnic slur. Rather
he was upfront and honest about what most people think about crime in the
city in general and UC in particular.
I have seen quite a few other coded posts here that have offended my
]
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 09:01:55 -0400
To: Richard Hotchkiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [UC] [ADMIN] decorum (and more noise)
While I wouldn't recommend that Jeff, or anybody, volunteer to moderate
the list, I think that a list owner/sponsor ought to reserve the right
to warn individual
AM
Subject: Re: [UC] [ADMIN] decorum
On Tuesday, September 30, 2003, at 12:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BLAH BLAH BLAHH
Then why have a list if you plan to sensor free speech?
If people missuse or offend then let them answer themselves to the
offended
party. Let the politicians so
-2424
fax 215-405-3178
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Gerardo Razumney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:52 PM
To: University City List
Subject: Re: [UC] [ADMIN] decorum (and more noise)
A (low noise) vote for keeping the list open
On Wednesday, October 1, 2003, at 07:50 AM, Alex de Soto wrote:
Its my understanding that if a list (or Web site or online forum) is
moderated, the moderator assumes legal responsibility and liability for
content. Isn't that so?
As Scottish Law puts it not proven.
Sometimes yes and sometimes no.
Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
In a recent post to the list, Ross Bender waxed (hopefully) ironic:
http://www.mail-archive.com/univcity%40list.purple.com/msg04698.html
Folks, please, use the list to share information with your neighbors,
but please don't use it as a cabaret stage. The culture list is
11 matches
Mail list logo
