Most of this list is comprised of serial liars. By repeating their lies they
hope to convince people that what they say is true.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/10/07 12:03:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
speaking of apples and oranges, did the article say anything
about how t
Ray,
Just tell Melani the pointit's probably moot and not that important if
you keep harassing her instead.
Dan Myers
On 7/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In a message dated 7/11/07 12:03:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Melani Lamond wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writ
ginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 8:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: univcity@list.purple.com
Subject: Re: [UC] BID and the Public Record
Guy,
Please don't allow this type of stuff to be in
In a message dated 7/11/07 12:03:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Melani Lamond wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >>> HAHA thanks melani! now we see what our neighborhood's
> >>> proposed bid looks like, compared to mt. airy's bid. you
> >>> couldn't have made my point any more nicely!
> >
This whole thing sounded a little weird, so I didn't bother to respond
-- you said that Penn's for-profits are being assessed by the NID, but
that Mt. Aiery's university's for-profits aren't, and this some how
makes UCD's NID bad, ... I don't get that, and I doubt I'm going to. I
certainly get that
Melani Lamond wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
HAHA thanks melani! now we see what our neighborhood's
proposed bid looks like, compared to mt. airy's bid. you
couldn't have made my point any more nicely!
And your point was? When caught providing false information, resort
to fake laughter
Was there any citable empirical evidence in that post or was it all opinion?
On 7/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In a message dated 7/10/2007 1:44:19 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm still on the fence on this (as many of us might be)
The fence
Well said!
On 7/10/07 11:14 PM, "John Ellingsworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the response to Lomb21 highlights one of the reasons why:
>
> a) people lurk on this list and don't post;
> b) posters prefer to keep their names away from the dialogue;
> c) sometimes knowing your neighbor
--- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: univcity@list.purple.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 4:46 AM
Subject: Re: [UC] BID and the Public Record
Mr West
I apologize for not signing my last post to you. My name is Guy Laren. I
think that I di
Mr West
I apologize for not signing my last post to you. My name is Guy Laren. I
think that I did not intend to fool anyone and that not-signing was simply an
oversight. I've made the mistake before and I'll try not to make it again.
However, I was disappointed that the primary focus of
I think the response to Lomb21 highlights one of the reasons why:
a) people lurk on this list and don't post;
b) posters prefer to keep their names away from the dialogue;
c) sometimes knowing your neighbor isn't really all that great
All too often, one risks ridicule by the self-righteous and t
Lomb21,
Do you have an ordinary name? If so, could you please include it in
your neighborhood posts from now on?
You keep talking about "the NID/BID" in a way that leads me to suspect
you are another one of these notoriously isolated, parochial University
City persons who don't acknowledge th
Tony,
I respect most of the posts that you contribute to this Listserv. However,
I must say that when I read your comments regarding the NID/BID that you
sound to me like the Husband in the marriage therapy session who's answer to
each
of his wife's issues is "But I bought you a diamond r
heir
communities. There is no mold they must be forced into, for statutory or
economic reasons.
-- Tony West
KAREN ALLEN wrote:
From: Anthony West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [UC] BID and the Public Record
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 02:14:14 -0400
Well ... I have to say it happe
In a message dated 7/10/07 5:07:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> HAHA thanks melani! now we see what our neighborhood's
> proposed bid looks like, compared to mt. airy's bid. you
> couldn't have made my point any more nicely!
>
>
>
And your point was? When caught providing false information
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/
In a message dated 7/10/07 12:03:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
/
/speaking of apples and oranges, did the article say anything
about how the mt. airy bid was the brainchild of a large
nearby university? or about how the mt. airy bid boundaries
included *a large near
In a message dated 7/10/07 12:03:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> speaking of apples and oranges, did the article say anything
> about how the mt. airy bid was the brainchild of a large
> nearby university? or about how the mt. airy bid boundaries
> included a large nearby university which would
re getting
the benefits aren't paying a dime.
Dan Myers
From: Anthony West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [UC] BID and the Public Record
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 02:14:14 -0400
Well ... I have to say it happens all the time, that people receive
government benefits without payi
Doc Baldy wrote:
What I found remarkable was this:
"the Mt. Airy BID won its election without a single dissenting vote"
I can't imagine anything ever happening in our hood with complete
consensus...
Al Krigman wrote:
So, by all indications, this is a true "business improvement district"
In a message dated 7/10/2007 1:44:19 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm still on the fence on this (as many of us might be)
The fence has fallen down.
The NID as advanced by UCD, Wendell's claim in his UCReview "interview"
notwithstanding, is a dead issue. There
Well ... I have to say it happens all the time, that people receive
government benefits without paying equally into the system. Just about
every tax you can name exempts some classes of citizen from paying it.
They still get the benefits, if benefits there are.
This is true on a larger scale o
I'm still on the fence on this (as many of us might be)
And even though the BID (or NID or DID) has limited benefits. Perhaps when
assessed, the benefits would increase? And whose to say if imposing the
"descending mantle" might make people want 5 unit dwellings to improve the
area? Wouldn't that
Yes, Al.
> 1) Some interesting things not quoted above -- mostly in terms of
participation and involvement of the stakeholders, who seem to comprise
a true "Business
> Improvement District" since the affected blocks of Germantown Ave is
an unambiguous business strip where stakeholders engaged
From the article:
"every one of the 200 property owners who are affected by it was
mailed a ballot."
Thus I think your number 4 was correct. There were apparently 200
business locations.
What I found remarkable was this:
"the Mt. Airy BID won its election without a single dissenting vote"
In a message dated 7/5/2007 2:57:22 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
story about the Mt Airy BID
Tony's report, says -- in part:
Compared to other BIDs, it is small. It consists of both sides of Germantown
Avenue from the 6300 block to the 7600 block. Its budget is $
Want to catch an impartial story about the Mt Airy BID. Read Tony West's
fearless reporting. Anyone that would oppose a BID would be a crazy community
wrecker.
I read it in the paper:
http://www.phillyrecord.com/
First the Daily News excellent report and now West is comparing a BID to the
26 matches
Mail list logo
