AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [UC] HD : an Ad Hoc,
Non Binding, lots of time and reasons to change your...
Just a couple of comments:
-- Old City certainly
is an example of (1) high densities of population and activities; (2)mixtures
of primary uses
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- An important fact we all need to keep in mind is that only 18% of
the properties in the proposed Spruce Hill Historic District are owned
by single families. All other properties are owned/controlled by
developers and landlords. That's less than one out of five. We ca
In a message dated 4/6/2004 12:38:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just a couple of comments... (no need to quote them, you can go back and read them).
Just as I've said since day one. The proponents aren't interested in preservation. All this pretentious talk about our pr
Just a couple of comments:
-- Old City certainly is an example of (1) high densities of population and activities; (2)mixtures of primary uses; (3) small-scale, pedestrian-friendly blocks and
streetscapes; and (4) the retention of old buildings mixed in with new. With Historic Designation, it now
aren
From: L a s e r B e a m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: L a s e r B e a m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [UC] HD : an Ad Hoc, Non Binding, lots of time and reasons to
change your mind, POLL - Just Do It!
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 13:10:46 -0400
KAREN
Thanks you 2 for some thoughtful conversation. It sure
beats the personal attacks
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: L a s e r B e a m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Apr 5, 2004 10:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [UC] HD : an Ad Hoc, Non Binding, lots of time and reasons to chang
KAREN ALLEN wrote:
I support the historic district designation, although I do not live in
Spruce Hill. I think that some valid concerns have been raised regarding
how the Historic Commission functions, but these issues can and should
be addressed separately and apart from the concept of a his
